At 05:17 AM 6/22/2001 -0700, Benjamin Stuhl wrote:
> > In summary:
> >
> > 1. I don't like ~ for concat
> >
> > 2. But if it does become concat, then we still
> > shouldn't
> > change ~'s current unary meaning
> >
> >
> > Thanks for listening.
> >
> > -Nate
>
>I agree completely. However, this is no longer really a
>topic for -internals, it's really a purely language thing.
More importantly, it never really was a topic for -internals. Punctiation's
a strictly cosmetic issue. :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulator) Nathan Wiger
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... James Mastros
- Re: stealing something from plan9 os Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Simon Cozens
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Bart Lateur
- RE: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... David Grove
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Russ Allbery
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Benjamin Stuhl
- Dan Sugalski
