Hi there,
I'm rather new with Parrot, and I wanted to play with it a little. I'm
playing with parrot 0.0.7, I did *not* fetch the last CVS version.
I have a problem when I'm trying to read a file.
I looked at parrot_assembly.pod and saw:
open px, sy
Open the file Y on filehan
Hi, it's me again with my questions on pasm...
I just downloaded the latest version of Parrot (it's currently 17:00 GMT).
$ ./parrot -v
[...]
This is parrot version 0.0.7-devel built for i386-linux
[...]
$ cat test.pasm
new P0, .PerlArray
set P0[10], "foo"
set I0, P0.length
print I0
print "\n"
$
One should begin with slight updates.. :)
So this patch is just about pod in core.ops (unbalanced =over / =back, and a
missing blank line).
Btw, how do you prefer me to send patch (as if I were able to send more
patches... anyway...): plain text inside the mail or attached (such as this
one)?
Well, I don't know if this is interesting, but here's a patch that implement:
op rand(out NUM)
op rand(out NUM, in INT)
and does what you can guess. There's also a test file (I don't know wether
the tests should go in an existant test file).
But, there is a tiny, little problem: I don't c
y well...
+
+
+TODO
+
+* more error checking
+* better rand()/chr() methods
+* more tests (with Perl and Test::Harness)
+* debugging options
+* use an array of arrays instead of an array of strings
+* implement Befunge 98
+
+
+AUTHOR
+--
+Jerome Quelin, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+
+ACK
Not very useful, but will reflect the truth.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
345c345
< # Make sure index zero is indeed 7
---
> # Make sure index zero is indeed -15
434c434
<# Make sure index zero is indeed 7
---
># Make sure index zero is indeed -15
522c522
<# Make sur
Sorry guys, I was putting the blame on you when trying to load a file not
properly newline-terminated, but it was *all my fault*.
Here's the patch.
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -urbN parrot.orig/languages/Befunge-93/README parrot/languages/Befunge-93/README
--- parrot.orig/languages/Befung
On Jeudi 22 Août 2002 04:59, 'John Porter' wrote :
> And no one
> has suggested that HLL compiler writers shoudl emit befunge.
> Yet. :-)
Since we're talking about this, I have a suggestion... :o)
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dimanche 25 Août 2002 00:51, Tom Hughes wrote :
> > Some typos corrected in the pdds.
> Applied in part. I didn't apply all the changes to make the vtable method
> descriptions describe what the method will do rather than what it does as
> there doesn't seem to be any point to it.
Well, I corr
Hi there,
As a recent parroter, what striked me most while reading perl6-internals, is
that it's very perl-centric. Ok, I agree that:
* only Perl (and Larry) has planned its roadmap to include Parrot as its
final virtual machine.
* the name "perl6-internals" is really too restrictive (but th
On Jeudi 5 Septembre 2002 17:08, Dan Sugalski wrote :
> At 3:04 PM + 9/5/02, Leon Brocard (via RT) wrote:
> >I realise that proper Unicode support is coming, but it may be a while
> >to get here. We currently have ord() and it makes sense to have a
> >chr() as well, so that's what my patch pro
On Dimanche 8 Septembre 2002 11:28, Jerome Quelin wrote :
> In fact, I tried to change S0, and whatever S0 value is (I tried with
> several values: "<", ">", "A", "0", " "), I always get a 60 as its ordinal
> value...
I forgot t
On Dimanche 8 Septembre 2002 11:50, Peter Gibbs wrote :
> This looks like a COW bug. Try the attached patch (untested).
In fact, here's the minimal test case:
$ cat p.pasm <"
print I10
print "<\n"
end
EOF
$ perl ../../assemble.pl p.pasm >P.pbc
$ ../../parrot P.pbc
>v<
>97<
Attached is a patch for the Befunge interpreter:
- support of the chr instruction instead of Clinton's hack
- a Changes file
Oh, btw, I'm now using cvs diff in order to create my patches (thanks Leon) -
it rocks! I hope they are still valid patches.
Jérôme
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: parro
On Lundi 9 Septembre 2002 21:44, Jerome Quelin wrote :
> Attached is a patch for the Befunge interpreter:
> - support of the chr instruction instead of Clinton's hack
> - a Changes file
Uh, cvs diff does not handle new files (and cvs add needs write access to the
repository).
On Dimanche 22 Septembre 2002 12:08, Nicholas Clark wrote :
> (except by golfers and obfuscators. And several that I met at YAPC::EU are
> excited by the golfing and obfuscating possibilities of perl6. Be afraid)
As a golfer, I'm a bit disappointed by perl6's golfing possibilities. For
several r
On Lundi 23 Septembre 2002 10:33, Josef Hook wrote :
> I would really apreciate if someone would like to work on multiarrays.
Okay, I volunteer for this, 'cause it's one of the things I really really
need for my Befunge-98 interpreter. And everyone knows (or should know) that
supporting Befunge
Hi there,
I just discovered that:
a) my befunge interpreter is broken (would you stop beaking it please? :o))
b) push and pop operations are now supported by lists
c) there's a pmc for handling list of integers: intlist
I'll get back to point a) later when I'll have investigated it.
Point c)
On Saturday 12 October 2002 17:56, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible with
> > Parrot)?
> Please have a look at list - not a PMC currently but can/does simulate
> intlist now for testing. just compile/link list instead of intlist.
> list_pop(..
On Saturday 12 October 2002 18:26, Brent Dax wrote:
> # So, what else can I do? Catching exceptions (is that possible
> # with Parrot)?
> Not just yet. The ideas for exceptions are still bouncing around in the
> caverns of Dan's brain. :^)
So, what am I suppose to do? Is there a way to get the
>From my point of view - it isn't.
As I said in an earlier post, my Befunge interpreter is broken. It was doing
well not so long ago. Anyway, since I wanted to add intlists and push/pop, I
made some modifications. But I can't test them, since Parrot seems to be
badly broken...
At first, I tho
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:11, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > eq S0, "<", FLOW_GO_WEST
> [ branch not taken ]
> > And while I'm talking about strange things... Due to the fact that Parrot
> > does not branch to the correct l
On Sunday 13 October 2002 12:16, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > FYI, I just rsync'ed this afternoon (12/10/2002 14:52 GMT) my Parrot, and
> > did the traditionnal: perl Configure.pl ; make; make test
> > and
I was surfing on parrotcode.org and saw it's not really up-to-date...
At least, it still show version 0.0.7 as the current one.
Maybe there are also others things to change?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Would it be possible to rename the $PARROT/languages/Befunge-93
directory into $PARROT/languages/befunge ?
Indeed, as soon as parrot will support objects, I'll implement the
befunge 98 specs, and the same interpreter will be able to interpret 93
ou 98 befunge code...
I'm sorry, 'cause I
Hi,
I'd like to use multi-arrays, but I can't understand how they're
working. I looked at $PARROT/t/pmc/multiarray.t, but it's a bit
obscure.
Could you help me to understand them please? Or are they deprecated?
Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays? What are the
limitations of m
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 17:18, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > Should I use something else to have arrays of arrays?
> multiarrays are mainly intended for huge packed multi dim arrays.
Then what should I use for a 2D array?
> > ... What are the
> > limitations of multiarrays? I've read in classe
On Vendredi 29 Novembre 2002 19:02, you wrote:
> > Speaking of limitations, what can hold a multiarray? Only integers,
> > only strings, only pmc, a mix of everything?
> Everything a list can hold (i.e. all above, but no mix), though it
> would need a new class, which takes an list_type initializer
Hi,
When I want to save all the integer registers, I'm using pushi,
restoring them later with popi.
When I'm doing a pushi, the old values of the registers are still
present, but I'm wondering wether I can rely on this behavior, or if
it's accidental and may be removed with another implementati
On Mardi 3 Décembre 2002 23:24, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> The perl foundation was able to provide some grants towards work on
> this project and perl6. However, fund raising wasn't sufficient to
> keep grants going full time.
About two months ago, I asked the perl foundation about the grants, and
K
Hey,
Is it me or cvs.perl.org isn't in the dns anymore?
$ cvs diff | tee lol.patch
Unknown host cvs.perl.org.
No comment,
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Is it me or cvs.perl.org isn't in the dns anymore?
Never mind, my ISP dns should've been down for a moment. Everything is
ok by now...
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > - currently I'm just printing on stdout the resulting parrot code,
> > I lack an eval instruction in Parrot. Dan, Leo? :-)
> Here is the solution of our perl6 bootstrapping problem, I'll make an
> I ops ...
Nice to see how dummy languages make the whole stuff advance...
Hi there,
How can one retrieve the keys of a PerlHash in Parrot assembly? Is there
a way to traverse a hash?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> and who's got
> questions on how this works? (I can put together examples, but this
> is pretty long as it is, and I think it's reasonably
> self-explanatory. Besides, assembly language isn't generally the best
> way to demonstrate anything... :)
Well, as far as I'm concerned
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rafael Garcia-Suarez earned at least one giggle when he
> suggested that we just needed "v~" "^~" and we had our
> own flavour of Befunge.
I promise: Lyon.pm does _not_ earn anything from Chris Pressey [0] in
order to support Befunge! :-)
Jerome
[0] Chris Pressey is
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> 1)
> The call function to the compiler/assembler is kept as a NCI. Better
> would be a subclass of NCI (Compiler.pmc or so), which provides
> invoke_keyed(key, next)
Hmm, I don't know what a NCI is. Where (which files) can I find
information about them?
Jerome
--
[EMAI
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jerome Quelin (via RT) wrote:
> > - currently I'm just printing on stdout the resulting parrot code,
> > I lack an eval instruction in Parrot. Dan, Leo? :-)
> $ diff -ub ~/src/parrot/languages/ook/ook.pasm ook.pasm
> --- /home/lt/src/parrot/l
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> If you follow the calling conventions, then yes you'll be able to
> call python/ruby/perl/befunge routines from Lua code, and vice versa.
No, you won't be able to call befunge routines from Lua, because:
- befunge does not know how to define subroutines (at least befunge-93
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> *) Property: A named thing attached to an object. Properties are
> global to the object and public--i.e. there's no implicit hiding,
> namespaces, or whatnot. There can be only one foo property on an
> object, for example
[...]
> The interpreter must handle class hierarchy stu
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 8:39 PM +0100 2/3/03, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >> *) Property: A named thing attached to an object. Properties are
> >> global to the object and public--i.e. there's no implicit hiding,
> >> namespaces, or wh
Leon Brocard wrote:
> It's been a while since 0.0.9 (errr, 20th Dec). A lot has changed
> since then. Maybe it's time for a 0.1.0 release. What are we waiting
> for?
Dan said: "either exceptions or objects". Once we have one, we'll go to
0.1.0, and when the second will be implemented (order does
Steve Fink wrote:
> I'm assuming this will be 0.0.10
codename?
> I could be persuaded to call it 0.1.0
codename?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 07/02/24 12:00 +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> >parrotbug seems to be broken on win32.
> Actually, I think it's broken on all platforms.
as parrotbug (the program) father, i'd like to add that i don't have
time to work on it. (and it seems to show up)
anyone wanting to work on it or even adopt i
me Quelini
> +E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not that i'm actively maintaining them actively (busy elsewhere), but
it's "Jerome Quelin", not "Jerome Quelini". email is fine.
i guess you also forgot to patch MANIFEST with all those newly created
files, uh? :-)
jérôme
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 07/03/18 18:06 +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:51:32PM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > parrotbug also has the save option, and it saves a lot of
> > configuration information. I'm asking if the "send" feature can be
> > removed, which is the bit which seems to be broke
On 07/08/12 22:11 -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> docs/submissions.pod states:
> "DO NOT paste the content of the new file or files into the body of the
> message."
>
> I.e., send the content as an email attachment.
>
> But whenever I have used the 'parrotbug' utility, I have never seen a way
> to
On 07/08/22 11:16 +0200, Ron Blaschke wrote:
> Jerry mentioned yesterday that there shouldn't be any failures for a
> release, which makes sense as it would only upset users. Maybe there
> should be a ticket for the failures then? Or an environment variable
> like PARROT_PORTER which makes all te
Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> We setup a development list for ponie.
> email
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to subscribe.
May I ask why ponie doesn't use the p6i ml since as I see it, it's
another project for parrot and thus will use $PARROT/languages/ponie
(or perl5 or whatever)?
Jérôme
--
[EMAIL PROT
Hi there,
Since objects are closing in, I begin to work on the new version of
Befunge, that will be written in imcc.
Anyway, whatever the reason, I'm playing with imcc and have some
questions about it:
- will objects introduce a speed overhead? I'm asking this question
because the Lahey spac
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - will objects introduce a speed overhead?
> For sure, but not a big one. You can AFAIK obtain an integer index
> for an attribute or method so its basically an array lookup.
Nice. So maybe I'll go fo
Melvin Smith wrote:
> I just checked in an intial IMCC faq (parrot/imcc/docs/imcfaq.pod)
Great job. Attached you'll find some corrections for typos.
> The FAQ is small, but it at least answers all of the above.
As I see it, the faq will grow fast... Maybe we'll have to split it in
different pa
Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Melvin Smith wrote:
> > I just checked in an intial IMCC faq (parrot/imcc/docs/imcfaq.pod)
> Great job. Attached you'll find some corrections for typos.
And of course I forgot the patch file. Here it is.
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > * How does one retrieve arguments given on the command-line?
> > * How does one call a function? With arguments? With a variable
> > number of arguments? Get the return value(s) of a sub?
> > * How does
Hello,
While looking at Chromatic's anim_parrot_logo.imc (in examples/sdl), I
was wondering why the includes weren't at the same place. Indeed, the
source reads:
.sub _main
_init()
_MAIN()
end
.end
.include "library/sdl_types.imc"
.pcc_sub _init prototyped
.include "libr
chromatic wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 09:57, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > here is an easy to use (with PIR code) wrapper of the SDL library.
> > It tries to hide all internals of the wrapper and makes the most
> > important SDL functions directly available in PIR code.
> Overall this looks good.
[sni
Hi there,
Following Dan's warnocked demand, here's a first version of parrotbug:
- it is very rough
- it currently goes in parrot root dir
- there is no embedded (pod) doc
- it borrows heavily from perlbug
- currently bug reports are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- it only accepts -ok / -nok fla
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Since we need a new system to handle ok/nok/full bug reports, how
> 'bout we add in:
>
>parrotstatus-ok
>parrotstatus-nok
>parrotbug
> all @parrotcode.org. The first for automated OK reports, the second
> for automated nok reports, and the third for actual bug repo
otbug" => prompts for questions and send
TODO:
- clean up / factorise code in send_msg
- allow for user to review what will be sent
- tests with various flavours of perl (and especially perl 5.005)
- tests with various OS
- change the flags set (and maybe use Getopt::Long)
Leopold Toetsch
Robert Spier wrote:
> > The mails are indeed sent to parrotbug, parrotstatus-ok and
> > parrotstatus-nok (at parrotcode.org) for resp. bug reports, ok
> > reports or nok reports. And since I don't think those addresses are
> > set up...
> Not yet. I'm nudging Ask regularly about this.
But what sh
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
> Parrotbug reaches 0.0.1
> Jerome Quelin responded to Dan's otherwise ignored request for a
> parrot equivalent of perlbug when he offered an implementation of
> parrotbug for everyone's perusal, but didn't go so far to add it to
> t
Here after is a patch that changes a "use warnings" into $^W = 1 in
order to be able to check perl 5.005
We then get:
$ perl ./tools/dev/parrotbench.pl -c ../parrot_bench.conf -b vpm\$
Numbers are relative to the first one. (lower is better)
p p-j p-C p5.5p5.8py
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> That'd be about three to four for the CPU you've got, and when you
> throw in swapping I can see the compile time for that module hitting
> 15-20 minutes.
At least. FYI, I ran into the same problem some months ago. I had 128 Mb
on my P4 1.3GHz Linux box. The total compile ti
Will Coleda wrote:
> Update to this patch -
> Jerome has identified an issue with the language testing patch -
[...]
> The following bits of the Parrot::Test patch need to be reversed,
> which then keeps the perl6 test suite happy, and should remove the
> last /showstopper/ to applying the patch.
Nicholas Clark (via RT) wrote:
> parrotbug can only send mail.
> This isn't that useful on systems where mail is accepted by sendmail,
> but will never get delivered.
> perlbug is able to save the bug report to a file, which can then be
> copied over to a system that can send mail.
>
> Would it be
Allison Randal wrote:
> Okay, languages/perl6 is failing all its tests.
[...]
> Will or Jerome, could you take a minute to explain the direction
> you're taking Parrot::Test? I'll patch P6C::TestCompiler to match the
> new setup, but I want to do an "architecture sanity check" first.
I'm sorry, I'
Dan Sugalski wrote:
[...]
> CTIME Creation time
Will unixen use this for change time? (also spelled ctime too)
> OWNER_READTrue if owner can read
> OWNER_WRITE True if owner can write
> OWNER_EXECUTE True if owner can run
> OWNER_DELETE True if owner can delete
> GROUP_CD True
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 8:08 PM +0200 4/28/04, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >> CTIME Creation time
> >Will unixen use this for change time? (also spelled ctime too)
>
> Nope, for that they use mtime. We can expand the names to skip th
On Monday 17 May 2004 15:14, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> So the new parrotbug works? :-)
Not yet, but I finally found some tuits to work on it! :-)
And sorry for the noise, I forgot to put the --test flag.
> > LANGUAGE=en_US:en
>?
> Isn't that an oxymoron?
Uh? There are other
On Saturday 17 April 2004 22:44, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Nicholas Clark
> # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=28915 >
>
> parrotbug can only send mail.
ok, it can now!
Either use --save as a command-line flag, or you will be prompted for an
action if you do
Ticket 28915 is resolved, but I don't have rt rights to change its
status: can somebody close it please?
Thx,
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 17 May 2004 18:50, you wrote:
> Ticket 28915 is resolved, but I don't have rt rights to change its
> status: can somebody close it please?
Oh, and ticket 29653 (fake one) too.
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since I got some time to work on it... version 0.5.0 of parrotbug is
out!
Changes: one can re-edit the report before sending it.
HTH,
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 17 May 2004 19:26, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> Since I got some time to work on it... version 0.5.0 of parrotbug is
> out!
And version 0.6.0 takes flag --quiet (or -q) into account.
(I *know* I'm bumping version numbers too fast :-) )
If somebody sees some bugs in parrotbug, or
On Monday 17 May 2004 19:55, ibotty wrote:
> J> Either use --save as a command-line flag, or you will be prompted
> for an
> > action if you don't supply one of --send, --save, --dump.
> > I you chose to save to a file, either provide a filename with
> > --output (or -o or --output-file), or you wi
On Friday 25 June 2004 03:47, André Pang wrote:
> It only seems fair to be using the same library as Python, if you want
> a decent bignum speed comparison.
We don't mind being unfair, as long as parrot's winning :-)
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 12 July 2004 22:40, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> osname= darwin
> osvers= 7.0
> arch= darwin-thread-multi-2level
> cc= cc
> ---
> Flags:
[...]
> ---
> Summary of my parrot 0.1.0 configuration:
[...]
> ---
> Environment:
[...]
Eh! It looks like parrotbug is working!
*And* that someone i
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 14:38, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> For our purposes I think the typing should go:
> platform int->float->bignum
No int64?
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 20:29, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> I don't know what kind of layout/data would be useful
> to people so let me know if you want something else.
> I will update every Tuesday morning.
And here's a script that use your sqlite database to generate rrd file
and graph results.
Y
Hi,
I tried the pir-mode provided in the editor/ subdir. And when opening a
.imc file (I've associated .pir with pir-mode + font-lock-mode), I
cannot type spaces or carriage returns:
(24) (warning/warning) Error caught in `font-lock-pre-idle-hook':
(invalid-regexp Invalid syntax designator)
And
On 04/10/01 23:22 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And the minibuffer tells me:
> > Symbol's function definition is void: line-beginning-position
> > I'm using xemacs 21.4.14
>
> How about defining
On 04/10/03 00:33 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> > Now it works, I can use spaces and returns. But while fontifying, I get:
> >
> > (5) (warning/warning) Error caught in `font-lock-pre-idle-hook':
> > (invalid-regexp Invalid syntax designator)
>
> How about this fix:
>
> Index: pir-mode.el
On 04/10/03 12:09 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> > Works like a charm. Thanx a lot.
> > Does it still works with emacs?
> Yes, as far as I can tell.
>
> > If yes, then do you have commit rights?
> I don't have commit rights.
>
> There are further changes I would like to make to pir-mode.el,
On 04/10/03 15:10 +0100, John Paul Wallington wrote:
> > > There are further changes I would like to make to pir-mode.el, mostly
> > > simple bug-fixes and clean-ups.
> > Then, send the whole patch and I'll apply it for you.
> Here you go:
[snip]
> ;;; pir-mode.el ends here
Applied with due credi
On 04/10/05 10:30 -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 21:39:59 +0100, Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > switch to emacs. :)
> > Or patch pir-mode.el, your choice.
> That should be something like:
[snip]
> no?
John Paul Wall
On 04/10/23 08:25 -0700, Stepan Roh wrote:
> While playing with Parrot I found a few bugs and problems in Befunge
> interpreter. Although it is not important part of Parrot
What? Not important? I was one of the first small languages implemented!
And saying that befunge is not important is like sa
On 04/11/01 11:17 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> But either at startup or dynamically, individual loggers can be
> enabled to start (or stop) outputing messages that exceed a given
> threshhold (debug, info, warn, error, fatal).
One thing that I really miss in this kind of logging framework is t
On 04/11/02 22:10 -0500, Matt Diephouse wrote:
> We have collected benchmark data for regular and
> optimized builds with and without JIT from June 1st through October.
What about comparing against perl*, python and ruby?
Nice work,
Jerome
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 04/11/03 11:19 -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
> What gets more fun is raising something (usually e) to a matrix power.
> Then you have to do things with the Jordan Connical form and
> decompose your matrix into eigenvalues and stuff. On the plus side,
> this also allows you to define the sin and co
On 04/11/22 07:14 -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match.
> They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with
> a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change.
Well, since we're nitpicking conventions an
On 07/10/01 15:58 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> - Pick a directory and grep (or ack) for 'find_type'. It was a common idiom
> in the old object system that doesn't work any more. Change:
>
> $IX = find_type "ClassName"
> $PX = new $IX
>
> to:
>
> $PX = new "ClassName"
what about:
find_type $
On 07/10/02 12:58 +0200, Jerome Quelin wrote:
> > $IX = find_type "ClassName"
> > $PX = new $IX
> >
> > to:
> >
> > $PX = new "ClassName"
here's a patch for examples/streams.
if you ack it, i'll apply it (i should still have the c
On 07/10/02 19:05 -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Jerome Quelin wrote:
>> other question: which directory has the higher priority for you?
>
> They all need to be fixed before we roll the branch back into the trunk, so
> they're all equally important.
committed some fin
93 matches
Mail list logo
