On 04/11/22 07:14 -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match.
> They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with
> a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change.

Well, since we're nitpicking conventions and consistency, what about:
        PGE::compile
and     PGE::match      (instead of Match)

Jerome
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to