On 04/11/22 07:14 -0700, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > Looks great to me -- I'll switch things around to (pardon the pun) match. > They'll become "P6GE::compile" (compiler sub) and "P6GE::Match", with > a note that P6GE::compile is still subject to change.
Well, since we're nitpicking conventions and consistency, what about: PGE::compile and PGE::match (instead of Match) Jerome -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]