At 04:43 PM 8/16/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>DS> * There was some discussion about garbage collection, but it's not really
>DS> gone anywhere, besides to the bookstore. The current reference-count GC
>DS> scheme will probably go, thoug
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> * There was some discussion about garbage collection, but it's not really
DS> gone anywhere, besides to the bookstore. The current reference-count GC
DS> scheme will probably go, though.
Err, when did this decision come about. I saw so
Well, here's something I think I need to delegate. :)
The perl6-internals list hasn't seen nearly the traffic that perl6-language
has, has yet to spawn off any sub-lists, and has produced only a few RFCs.
This is, in general, a good thing, as it's somewhat premature to be getting
too deep into
