On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > 3. Are there any other configuration steps which are no longer needed?
>
> Well, I proposed eliminating the attributes and warnings tests, but I was
> overruled on that. Other than those, nothing
On Mon Jul 14 17:14:09 2008, doughera wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > 2. Apart from deleting the step, then running 'make' and 'make test',
> > is there any other way to demonstrate that these types are not used?
>
> Yes. Look at the Config variables that are set
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Mon Jul 14 10:55:35 2008, doughera wrote:
> > Some of the new tests for auto::pack fail for me:
> >
> > t/steps/auto_pack-01.t4 1024334 12.12% 14-17
> >
> >
>
> 1. This is a test that I wrote, so I would be interested in at
On Mon Jul 14 10:55:35 2008, doughera wrote:
> Some of the new tests for auto::pack fail for me:
>
> $ perl t/harness -v t/steps/auto_pack-01.t > out 2>&1
> t/steps/auto_pack-01# Failed test (t/steps/auto_pack-01.t at
> line 101)
> # Failed test (t/steps/auto_pack-01.t at line 102)
>
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #56928]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56928 >
Some of the new tests for auto::pack fail for me:
$ perl t/harness -v t/steps/auto_pa
