I believe I've fixed the problem in r27999.
On 01/04/2008, Mark Glines via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Mar 29 15:54:09 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I ran a fulltest with this patch applied, and everything's fine on x86
> > (where it matters).
>
> Hi,
>
> The root.in portion of this patch breaks non-i386, JIT capable
> platfo
On Sat Mar 29 15:54:09 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I ran a fulltest with this patch applied, and everything's fine on x86
> (where it matters).
Hi,
The root.in portion of this patch breaks non-i386, JIT capable
platforms. Problem is, the patch created an exec_dep.c for i386, but
added a Mak
On Friday 09 November 2007 00:24:43 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I'll have a go at testing against the exec runcore and see what turns
> up. This is likely something we should be testing more often right?
Definitely.
I ran a fulltest with this patch applied, and everything's fine on x86 (where
it ma
On 16/03/2008, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua, Paul:
>
> Can you give us an update on the status of patch still?
As far as I remember, it still needs to be tested on the various runcores.
Paul
Joshua, Paul:
Can you give us an update on the status of patch still?
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 09/11/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runco
On 09/11/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
> outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runcore and see what turns
up. This is likely something
Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
Also, I'm not sure the exec runcore even works. I haven't heard of it
working in quite some time.
On Nov 8, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Paul Cochrane (via RT) wr
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #47289]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47289 >
Hi,
the attached patch moves the executable code out of
src/jit/i386/exec_dep.h into /
10 matches
Mail list logo
