On Nov 9, 2007, at 2:24 AM, Paul Cochrane wrote:
On 09/11/2007, Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you test the exec runcore? I don't think any of that code is used
outside of the exec runcore so you aren't actually testing that code.
I'll have a go at testing against the exec runcore and see what turns
up. This is likely something we should be testing more often right?
Paul
Most of the runcores are greatly undertested. The switched runcore for
instance is small in executable size, and faster than the standard
runcore(great for embedded systems on both parts), but there isn't even
a smoke target for it. If you look at the smoke report page, how many
smokes do you see using the jit runcore on any platform? Further
still, how many language smokes using jit?
