Dan Sugalski wrote:
> And, unless Larry objects, I feel that all vtable methods should have
> the option of going with a 'scalar native' form if the operation if it's
> determined at runtime that two scalars are the same type, though this is
> optional and bay be skipped for cost reasons. (Doing
--| UML is extremely useful as a design language. I wonder, though, how
--| a distributed collaborative effort can utilize it.
i think that what has to happen is that some one (larry, Dan, anyone?) comes
up with a top level object decompostion and then those boxes get farmed out
to people to fil
> >
> >Try Martin Fowler's UML Distilled, very good and short!
>
> Is it available electronically, or do I need to trot over to Quantum Books
> and drop some cash on it? (Man, they love me there...) If it's paper, got
> an ISBN?
>
uhm unfortunately it'll cost you its about $30USD (i fortunately
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote:
> > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural.
> >
> >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP.
>
> Fair enough, and I was.
>
> I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview?
