Re: [perl #52454] [PATCH] t/compilers/imcc/syn/regresssions_2 divide by zero

On Thursday 03 April 2008 11:22:16 Andy Dougherty wrote: > First, deep inside IMCC_subst_constants() in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c, > when the divide by zero fails, it returns a NULL value, but forgets to > also set the undocumented "return" value for 'ok'. The appended patch > sets it to 0, figu

Re: [svn:parrot] r26751 - in trunk/docs: . pdds pdds/draft pmc

From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:28:37 -0700 On Friday 04 April 2008 17:18:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > * docs/pmc/subs.pod: >+ Ditto. This could use a good deal more updating -- some of the > examples use very old calling convent

[perl #52482] languages/lua/src/yapp/Lua/parser.pm failing t/codingstd/copyright.t t/codingstd/svn_id.t

# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #52482] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52482 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18.3 arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi cc= cc --- Fl

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26760 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 19:27:26 2008 New Revision: 26760 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod Log: Make it pass the linelength codingstd test. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod == ---

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26759 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 19:24:04 2008 New Revision: 26759 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod Log: Correct POD formatting error. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod == --- trunk/docs/pdd

[perl #52054] [CAGE]: Make all PDDs conform to coding standards

The PDDs in docs/pdds/ are now in substantial compliance with the coding standard, those in docs/pdds/draft/ much less so. I'll leave this ticket open, but it's the sort of thing that only needs some cage cleaning attention every month or so.

[perl #52472] [BUG] tools/build/list_unjitted.pl outdated

On Fri Apr 04 17:24:59 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If we had anyone who wanted to hack on the JIT (see the Parrot GSoC > potential > projects list), it would be useful. > > How about moving it to tools/dev/ instead for now? > Okay. Done in r26756. No other changes made yet. kid51

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26755 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 17:41:29 2008 New Revision: 26755 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd18_security.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd20_lexical_vars.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd21_namespaces.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd24_events.pod Log: Bring file closer to conformance with coding standards for

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26754 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 17:34:08 2008 New Revision: 26754 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod Log: Bring file closer to conformance with coding standards for PDDs (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod ===

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26753 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 17:31:37 2008 New Revision: 26753 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod Log: Bring file closer to conformance with coding standards for PDDs (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod ===

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26752 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 17:29:30 2008 New Revision: 26752 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod Log: Bring file closer to conformance with coding standards for PDDs (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod ===

Re: [svn:parrot] r26751 - in trunk/docs: . pdds pdds/draft pmc

On Friday 04 April 2008 17:18:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Log: > * docs/pmc/subs.pod: >+ Ditto. This could use a good deal more updating -- some of the > examples use very old calling conventions -- but I'm not sure how > to do this without changing PASM to PIR. It wouldn't hurt

Re: [perl #52472] [BUG] tools/build/list_unjitted.pl outdated

On Friday 04 April 2008 17:03:02 James Keenan via RT wrote: > On Fri Apr 04 06:22:01 2008, coke wrote: > > This file could use some care (or be deleted): > > - It hasn't tracked movement of source directories > > - has some colorful exceptions messages which need to be standardized > > - the comp

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26751 - in trunk/docs: . pdds pdds/draft pmc

Author: rgrjr Date: Fri Apr 4 17:18:59 2008 New Revision: 26751 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd06_pasm.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Modified: trunk/docs/compiler_faq.pod trunk/docs/pmc/subs.pod Log: * docs/compiler_faq.po

[perl #52054] [CAGE]: Make all PDDs conform to coding standards

On Thu Apr 03 12:17:32 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I began working on this today and noticed that many PDDs lack a SYNOPSIS > section -- and they do quite well without it. > > I recommend relaxing the requirements in docs/pdds/pdd00_pdd.pod and > t/codingstd/pdd_format.t that each doc have SY

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26750 - in trunk: docs/pdds t/codingstd

Author: jkeenan Date: Fri Apr 4 17:14:17 2008 New Revision: 26750 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd00_pdd.pod trunk/docs/pdds/pdd_template.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Modified: trunk/t/codingstd/pdd_format.t Log: (1) Per posting in http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Displa

[perl #52472] [BUG] tools/build/list_unjitted.pl outdated

On Fri Apr 04 06:22:01 2008, coke wrote: > This file could use some care (or be deleted): > > - It hasn't tracked movement of source directories > - has some colorful exceptions messages which need to be standardized > - the comparison algorithm to find out if something is jitted could be > switch

[perl #51464] [TODO] [PDD] add date stamps to PDD's

On Fri Apr 04 04:30:17 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One (possibly solvable) problem is that subversion tags don't > substitute properly in the HTML generated versions on the website > . > What code do we use to generate those pages?

Re: [perl #52462] [PATCH] [UGLY] FixedIntegerArray->new_from_string() needs cleanup

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:50:27 -0500 "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:06:39AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > > On Thursday 03 April 2008 15:47:12 Mark Glines wrote: > > > > > When doing a test for --gc=libc, I noticed test 10 of > > > t/op/calling.t was hanging

Re: tutorial, blog, hackathon

> The dorms sound workable. Is it the same dorms as last time YAPC::NA was in > Chicago? Those are under construction, so we've been moved to the other set of dorms across the road from the 2k6 dorms. They are a little older, but have been recently updated and are supposedly decent dorms (and no

Re: [perl #51944] Cygwin Readme [PATCH]

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 3:18 PM, John Trammell via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2008/3/20, via RT Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda > > > # Please include the string: [p

Re: [perl #51944] Cygwin Readme [PATCH]

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/3/20, via RT Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > # New Ticket Created by Will Coleda > > # Please include the string: [perl #51944] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > > # h

Re: [svn:parrot] r26747 - in trunk/languages/lua: config/makefiles src/lib

On Friday 04 April 2008 11:26:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Added: >trunk/languages/lua/src/lib/random.pir (contents, props changed) > Modified: >trunk/languages/lua/config/makefiles/root.in > > Log: > [Lua] > - add random library > Added: trunk/languages/lua/src/lib/random.pir > ==

Re: [perl #52462] [PATCH] [UGLY] FixedIntegerArray->new_from_string() needs cleanup

On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:06:39AM -0700, chromatic wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2008 15:47:12 Mark Glines wrote: > > > When doing a test for --gc=libc, I noticed test 10 of t/op/calling.t > > was hanging. The test creates a FixedIntegerArray from the string "0, > > 0x20, 0x20, 0". The new_from

Re: [perl #52462] [PATCH] [UGLY] FixedIntegerArray->new_from_string() needs cleanup

On Thursday 03 April 2008 15:47:12 Mark Glines wrote: > When doing a test for --gc=libc, I noticed test 10 of t/op/calling.t > was hanging. The test creates a FixedIntegerArray from the string "0, > 0x20, 0x20, 0". The new_from_string() constructor relies on STRING* > buffers containing a traili

[perl #52472] [BUG] tools/build/list_unjitted.pl outdated

# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #52472] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52472 > This file could use some care (or be deleted): - It hasn't tracked movement of source di

Re: [perl #52436] Flush examples/pasm/queens.pasm?

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, via RT Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers > # Please include the string: [perl #52436] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52436 > > > >

Re: [Fwd: [svn:parrot-pdd] r26719 - trunk/docs/pdds]

All PDD commits have been going to the main list for some time now. I believe the rationale is that changes to our design documents are typically big enough to warrant notifying everyone on the main list, not just those subscribed to the commits list. Regards. On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Jam

Re: [perl #51464] [TODO] [PDD] add date stamps to PDD's

On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:21:56 -0700 "Mark Glines via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:18:47 -0700 "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Datestamps in the filename (e.g., MMDD)? Or somewhere inside the file? Datestamps in the file, something like in the Pe

[perl #52462] [PATCH] [UGLY] FixedIntegerArray->new_from_string() needs cleanup

# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines # Please include the string: [perl #52462] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52462 > When doing a test for --gc=libc, I noticed test 10 of t/op/calling.t was hanging. The te

[Fwd: [svn:parrot-pdd] r26719 - trunk/docs/pdds]

A bunch of my SVN commits from yesterday suddenly showed up on the main list this morning -- and not from any (conscious) action on my part. Why are these showing up here and *not* in perl.cvs.parrot? (See: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cvs.parrot/) Wouldn't it be better to have all co

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26721 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Thu Apr 3 12:02:38 2008 New Revision: 26721 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod Log: Make PPD conform to coding standard for PDDs (https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod ===

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26723 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Thu Apr 3 12:12:57 2008 New Revision: 26723 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd13_bytecode.pod Log: Make PPD conform to coding standard for PDDs (https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd13_bytecode.pod =

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26739 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: kjs Date: Fri Apr 4 02:16:08 2008 New Revision: 26739 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd29_compiler_tools.pod Log: [pdd29] fix a small layout thing; add a bit to synopsis for actions; add some HLLCompiler API methods. Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd29_compiler_tools.pod ===

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26722 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Thu Apr 3 12:08:05 2008 New Revision: 26722 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod Log: Make PPD conform to coding standard for PDDs (https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod =

[perl #48549] [RFC][PIR] Let .namespace (no args) have empty brackets

My yacc is a little fuzzy (I made a funny!), but I think this simple little patch here should do the trick. I included two patch files, depending on how much you want to change. imccnamespacefix.patch: This fixes the brackets issue for the IMCC bison file. I don't have bison on my system, so I cou

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26720 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Thu Apr 3 11:55:49 2008 New Revision: 26720 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod Log: Make PPD conform to coding standard for PDDs (https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd03_calling_conventions.pod ===

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26719 - trunk/docs/pdds

Author: jkeenan Date: Thu Apr 3 11:51:58 2008 New Revision: 26719 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd00_pdd.pod Log: Make PPD conform to coding standard for PDDs (https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52054). Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd00_pdd.pod ===

[perl #52436] Flush examples/pasm/queens.pasm?

# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers # Please include the string: [perl #52436] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52436 > While looking at removing the C and C ops, I found this old queens.pasm example which u

[svn:parrot-pdd] r26738 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Author: kjs Date: Fri Apr 4 01:50:45 2008 New Revision: 26738 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd29_compiler_tools.pod Log: [pdd29] add more stuff to pdd29 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd29_compiler_tools.pod ==

Re: [svn:parrot-pdd] r26707 - trunk/docs/pdds/draft

Hi Geoffrey, thanks for your reply and your thoughts. Please keep in mind it was not a proposal to remove this long-invocation syntax, it just came to mind when I realized that it's not used that much. On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04