On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, via RT Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers > # Please include the string: [perl #52436] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52436 > > > > While looking at removing the C<saveall> and C<restoreall> ops, I > found this old queens.pasm example which uses stack calling. Because it > is just the output of the Jako compiler (from mid-2004), it has no > comments and is difficult to follow, which is poor for an example. > Furthermore, the current Jako compiler emits PIR that is somewhat more > readable (but still uncommented), and runs almost 5x faster. > > So queens.pasm is now a good example of how *not* to write PASM, and > I think it should be deleted. Any objections?
No. (also please remove references to it from MANIFEST, t/examples/pasm.t, and examples/pir/queens_r.pir) -- Will "Coke" Coleda
