On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 9:33:55 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Okay, here are some tasks for the interested. They're all related (I
> expect you'll see the pattern), but independent anyway.
[...]
> 5) .NET (same as #4, a link to a good reference is fine)
Couldn't find any specifi
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, 5:42:28 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 08:59:40PM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote:
>> And the aioread/aiowrite/listio, etc. are a POSIX standard now, so they
>> should be reasonably available on most UNIXen.
> Are the aio* calls available
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, 6:16:41 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Monday, November 18, 2002, at 08:34 PM, Martin D Kealey wrote:
>> On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 08:28, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
>>> - floating point becomes allowed in explicit radix (and 0b,0c,0x)
>>
>> How can one h
On Monday, November 25, 2002, 7:59:01 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>> you'll have to write the code so that compiler knows how to handle
>> it. While not overly hard, I think its a little much for something
>> that should be provided in the core. I think the design team should
>> at
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, 1:26:41 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 12/10/2002 4:54 AM, Me wrote:
>> How would one most nicely code what I'll call
>> a lazy pipeline, such that the first result
>> from the final element of the pipeline can
>> appear as soon as the first result has
On Friday, January 10, 2003, 9:05:42 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Universe 2 (pro-unicode): "If we had a Unicode 'squiggly arrow' operator,
> then however it looks on everybody's display, it ought to at least look like
> some kind of squiggly arrow."
U+21DC "Leftwards Squiggle Arr
On Friday, January 17, 2003, 6:35:47 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 06:21:43PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr. Nobody) writes:
>> > I have to wonder how many people actually like this syntax, and how many only
>> > say they do because it's D
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, 7:44:42 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 13:13, Garrett Goebel wrote:
> Let me switch that one around for you:
> class MyContainer {
> method index($object) { ... } # index by any scalar object
> method ind
On Thursday, July 24, 2003, 5:45:33 PM, you (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 08:49 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
> No, I think Java interfaces are a kluge to get around copying a broken
> type system and the lack of multiple inheritance.
There are other alternatives..
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 10:08:31 AM, you
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Austin Hastings wrote:
>> How about just having C< system() > return a clever object with .output and
>> .err methods?
> interesting...
> Michele
Prior art of this on Windows...
http:/
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Dougherty) wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Jason Diamond wrote:
>
> > Then we could have a "driver" for each platform that consisted of
> > nothing
> > but #include's of other .c files. Making a directory for each
> > platform might
> > be
Firstly, 8am code this morning builds on Win32 without problem, other than
configure.pl not knowing that link is the linker (which appears to be down
to ActiveState not knowing).
Thanks to Hong Zhang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) for pointing out the
GetSystemTimeAsFileTime API. Also adjusts zero time
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent Dax) wrote:
> Richard J Cox:
> # Firstly, 8am code this morning builds on Win32 without
> # problem, other than
> # configure.pl not knowing that link is the linker (which
> # appears to be down
> # to ActiveState
Currently for a Win32 build WINVER is not being set, this leads to it
being set in Windef.h (included by Windows.h) to 0x0500, or "build for
Windows 2000".
This is OK, until (for whatever) reason a Win2k only API is called, at
which point the built exe will not run on earlier versions of Windo
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Dougherty) wrote:
> Could someone on Win32 also compare this to the perl5 version in
> ext/Time/HiRes.xs? There's no reason to have the perl community running
> two different versions. In particular, the perl5 version
Sorry... don't have
Sets defines to ensure that post Win95 functions are not defined in
windows.h.
Richard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
win32_h_WINVER.diff
Description: Binary data
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(James Mastros) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:38:58PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Currently, I don't want to promise back before Win98, though if Win95
> > is no different from a programming standpoint (I have no idea if it
> > is) the
Current get fails to build on Win32[1]
There are a host of problems (not the least being the object files not
going where the linker is expecting them), then aside the first is the
lack of a gettimeofday function. This is used in time_n.
Here's my Win32 version:
void gettimeofday(struct timev
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jarkko
Hietaniemi) wrote:
> My preference still is rely on *NOTHING* except an ANSI C compiler,
> and a way to execute the executable.
Which is fine, but how do you pass the source files to the compiler? What
other options does it need. What ab
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent Dax) wrote:
> krish:
> # I am a beginner in Perl and have a very trivial query. I have
> # some .expect
[...]
>
> This is the wrong group for this sort of question. perl6-internals is
s/internals/language/
but the rest does apply (it's
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Jonathan Scott Duff) wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 11:57:25AM +0100, Bart Lateur wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:43:07 -0500, Damian Conway wrote:
> >
> > >What we're cleaning up is the ickiness of having things declared
> > outside
> > >t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Simon Cozens) wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 04:52:53PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> > Perhaps we shouldn't be using ; for this.
>
> Given hyperoperators, I wonder if we can actually drop map.
Something like
@res = ^{ DoSomething($a) }, @sou
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Simon Cozens) wrote:
> It's a pretty simple concept. We need to assign one PMC to another.
> We'll have to do it all the time:
>
> $a = $b;
>
> $a and $b are both PMCs, and we need to set the value of one to the
> value of the other, so le
23 matches
Mail list logo
