Re: cvs commit: parrot core.ops

What is this supposed to do? It breaks the tcc build, and generally looks ungood to me. --Josh At 18:03 on 04/01/2002 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > cvsuser 02/04/01 10:03:29 > > Modified:.core.ops > Log: > Minor optimization > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.1

Added macros for interpreter->flags

--- Forwarded Message Date:02 Apr 2002 06:24:19 + From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: parrot/io io.c io_win32.c cvsuser 02/04/01 22:24:19 Modified:.core.ops embed.c interpreter.c runops_cores.c include/parrot

Re: PDD formatting issues

At 1:19 on 04/02/2002 EST, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I ran across the following errors while running pod2html over the PDDs: The errors from "podchecker" were better about line numbers, but still, this was helpful. > [parrot@damogran pdd]$ pod2html pdd00_pdd.pod >pdd00_pdd.html > [parr

[Applied] round up of warning fixes

Thanks, applied! --Josh At 9:49 on 04/03/2002 +0100, Jonathan Stowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the residue of the warning fixes I have made and which haven't > been applied before I start a new working copy :) > > Index: chartype.c > =

[Applied] Yet another MANIFEST patch

Applied this one. No time to look at the others tonight, but i'll pick them up if nobody else does. --Josh At 19:03 on 04/06/2002 EST, Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- MANIFEST.old Sat Apr 6 13:35:21 2002 > +++ MANIFEST Sat Apr 6 13:37:17 2002 > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@

Re: [Applied] String comment fixes

This one too. --Josh At 19:10 on 04/11/2002 EDT, Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This patch tidies up a few of the comments in string.c, and fixes one > actual documentation bug -- namely, string_chopn removes the last > n _characters_, not the last n _bytes_. > > Simon > >

Re: [Applied] Fix up comments in pmc.c

Cool, applied. At 18:21 on 04/11/2002 EDT, Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We no longer pass a PMC pointer into pmc_new, but the comment hasn't been > changed to reflect that. Patch below corrects, and also adds an > appropriate comment for pmc_new_sized. > > Simon > > --- p

[Applied] pasm.el

Marco- i went ahead and added your pasm.el file under parrot/editor/. I'm not familiar enough with the ops to commit your other patch- i'll leave that for someone else. --Josh At 20:21 on 04/14/2002 +0200, Marco Baringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ok, please pardon the inconvience but e

Re: [Applied] Remove redundant declarations

Applied, thanks. Had to change the chartype.h part a bit, as it didn't want to apply on its own. I am not sure why. Anyway, it's in. Is there a reason not to include -Wredundant_decls in our default warnings flags? --Josh At 22:54 on 04/16/2002 EDT, Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [APPLIED] Re: First patch to memory allocation routines

At 15:58 on 05/01/2002 PDT, Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've applied this patch, along with fixing the original resources.c's > indentation (re-indenting patches are annoying, but this patch touched > enough of resources.c files that it seemed like a golden opportunity.) Here are so

Re: new FAQs

At 19:05 on 05/23/2007 PDT, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It sounds like you are saying that languages are free to implement > > their own semantics using their own code, and that they can choose not > > to interoperate with predefined Parrot types or types from other > > languages when

Re: new FAQs

At 20:07 on 05/23/2007 PDT, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:37:06PM -0400, Josh Wilmes wrote: > > > At 19:05 on 05/23/2007 PDT, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - better compiler tools than lex and yacc. >

<    1   2   3