Parrot/OpFunc.pm).
Enjoy,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Be
Thanks. Applied.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> This enables typecasting between I and N registers, fixes up the
> error messages, and makes "var num" not require an assignment.
>
> I note that some pseudo-ops don't work, and "mod" doesn't work
> as a pseudo op with a constant; nor
a 'scripts'
subdirectory?
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Researc
n't any objections...
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Be
Here's the failure stuff from the build process:
gcc -o parrot -L/usr/local/lib test_main.o blib/lib/libparrot.a -lnsl
-ldl -lm -lpthread -lcrypt -lutil
blib/lib/libparrot.a(jit_cpu.o)(.text+0x2ce0): In function
`Parrot_jit_restart_op':
: undefined reference to `Parrot_end_jit'
collect2: ld retu
of
implementation is causing the compile failure. And,
the existence of the prototype in two places seems
like a bad idea...
Which file do you think has the implementation of
this function?
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 11:48, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PRO
H ((PREV_OP == dec_i) || (PREV_OP == inc_i) || (PREV_OP ==
sub_i_i_i))
Parrot_end {
jit_emit_end(NATIVECODE);
}
$
But its definitely not ending up in jit_cpu.c here...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 12:51, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Leo --
Daniel and I are on the trail...
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 17:47, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>
> > Leo --
> >
> > My jit_cpu.c doesn't have a Parrot_jit_end() in it:
> >
> > $ grep end_jit jit_cpu.c
>
> Wasn't her
OK.
Daniel and I drilled into it and we discovered that a
small change to two regexps in jit2h.pl solved the
problem.
I have checked in the change.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 18:02, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> Leo --
>
> Daniel and I are on the trail...
>
> On Wed
All --
I just checked in some changes to Jako that bring rudimentary
module support. Its rudimentary because for now, modules are
not referenced from separate files, but simply form handy
named groups of symbols within the single source file being
compiled.
Of course, this really becomes useful o
All --
I just checked in changes that add real (for some values of "real")
modules to Jako. The lexer now handles #line directives, and
intercepts 'use ', bringing in the lines from the
appropriate file to be lexed.
The Jako Standard Library (languages/jako/*.jako, including sys,
string and Curse
All --
I just checked in a small patch that allows Jako to start
grokking PMCs. For example:
use sys;
var pmc foo;
foo = new PerlUndef;
foo = "Hello, world!\n";
sys::print(foo);
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTE
Melvin --
Thanks!
Its of only limited utility until I get the key stuff
working, but I was tired of having a null PMC story
for Jako.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 18:01, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 05:44 PM 7/8/2003 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> >I just checked in a sm
IIRC, that has been the policy during previous freezes.
However, I can stop tinkering if its getting in anyone's
way or on anyone's nerves...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 18:01, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 11:50 PM 7/8/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >Gr
Leo --
No problem. I saw the smiley, but SCNR was new to me.
"we cool"
:)
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 02:08, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>
> > IIRC, that has been the policy during previous freezes.
> >
> > However, I ca
All --
I just did a CVS update, and I had to make the following changes
to get it to compile (I also had to delete and update
languages/imcc/parser.[hc], which I think was expected).
I didn't check it in because I'm not sure if the stuff I commented
out is really supposed to go (although recent p
All --
I noticed that there are many files with copyrights of
"when this is determined...", while some files have a
copyright of Yet Another Society. Seems like they should
all be Yet Another, or none should be...
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
> Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All --
>
> > I just did a CVS update, and I had to make the following changes
> > to get it to compile
>
> Why did it not compile? What error message?
>
> > ... (I also had to delete and update
>
At line 679 of languages/imcc/pbc.c, we have:
case 'I':
if (r->name[0] == '0' && r->name[1] == 'x')
r->color = strtoul(r->name+2, 0, 16);
else if (r->name[0] == '0' && r->name[1] == 'b')
r->color = strtoul(r->name+2, 0, 2);
All --
I changed the Jako makefile to use imcc instead of assemble.pl,
but I noticed that the mandelzoom example no longer cleared
the screen between screen updates. So, I manually assembed its
languages/jako/examples/mandelzoom.pasm with assemble.pl with
the idea of comparing the results of dissa
wrote:
> s/Yet Another Society/The Perl Foundation/g
>
>
> Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> > All --
> >
> > I noticed that there are many files with copyrights of
> > "when this is determined...", while some files have a
> > copyright of Yet Another So
Simon --
It used to be that the 'mod' op was the mathematically "correct"
(in the Knuth sense) op, and the 'cmod' op was 'mod' per the C
implementation used to compile Parrot (which are two very different
things, it turns out). I wrote the Knuth-mod op originally, and
proposed having both versions
Benjamin --
The trick is to find the cheapest possible way to get conditional
processing to occur if and only if there are events in the event
queue.
I'll only be considering the fast core here for simplicity. But,
if you look at include/parrot/interp_guts.h, the only thing of
interest there is t
Juergen --
Juergen Boemmels wrote:
Write
PutS
Why are there two diffrent calls to write data to an io, with only a
slightly different prototype. This is code-duplication in every
layer. I can't think of any use case where PutS won't be implemented
as Write(..., data, strlen(data)). These
I think Parrot is already about subversion.
All your interpreter are belong to us.
Ron Blaschke wrote:
Just curious. Are there any plans moving parrot to subversion?
Ron
Leo --
I had posted a program a while ago that generates large
fake programs for testing such things. Did that not help?
I think I still have it in my working directory if you'd
like to have a peek at it...
Regards,
-- Gregor
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 12:05 PM +0200 4/13/05, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
As
Sounds like a deep version of map...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 06:02, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 08 April 2004 23:49, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:28:49PM +0200, Jens Rieks wrote:
> > > Data::Replace replaces every occurrence of one PMC in a neste
So, we are moving in a more verbose direction, which is a bummer for
people who like to write one-liners and other tiny programs.
Assuming only Perl 6 is installed on your system, if your script
started with:
#!/usr/bin/perl
all the stuff about trying to figure out what version you are using
w
ture of Perl 6.
#!/usr/bin/perl6
... # Perl 6 stuff here
use 5; # or, whatever
# Perl 5 stuff here
no 5; # or, whatever
# More Perl 6 stuff here
use python; # you get the idea
...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 12:59, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Wed, 200
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 09:29, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> >
> >>So, we are moving in a more verbose direction, which is a bummer for
> >>people who like to write one-liners and other tiny programs.
> >
> >
> > per
achy keen. If you pass it to a Python
interpreter, you get what you deserve :) You have used "use syntax"
which falls under the category of "# or whatever" in my message.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 18:51, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
> Gregor N
So, where and when is the pie-throwing going to happen, precisely?
IIRC, its at OSCON, but last time i googled for it, I didn't see
mention of which OSCON session or BOF it would be at
Regards,
-- Gregor
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Since this is getting worked on now, I figured I'd post the benchmark U
Leo --
I had tinkered around with this stuff back in 2003, and ended up writing
Python::Bytecode::SAX to help me visualize bytecode. IIRC, I ran into
the same issue of only disassembling one code block. I'd be interested
to know if P::B::S treats your example python bytecode any better than
P::B. I
Dan --
Thanks for mentioning Jako. It usually gets no respect. :)
But, I think Jako is "working" for some definition of "working". But, it
is clearly not an idiomatic compiler in that its using old conventions
(not surprising, given its history).
Did I miss the creation of the compiler-writer list?
Hmmm...
Wouldn't a C compiler want to return a sub that invoked the main()
(if there was one)? And, if there wasn't one, wouldn't the C compiler
want to return a sub that raised an exception?
Regards,
-- Gregor
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 11:03 PM -0700 8/21/04, Steve Fink wrote:
I am experimenting with
Dan --
I think it would be interesting to find out how, say, gcc
behaves on the pathological code structures you've run into.
Could your compiler spit out a structurally (although not
semantically! :) equivalent piece of C code that could be
used with a C compiler to see how we do vs. C compilers i
;
print ".end\n";
print "\n";
exit 0;
- snip
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 6:50 AM -0700 8/30/04, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
Dan --
I figured. We could probably write a code-generator that used a PRNG
to generate massive amounts of
++ -c gen.cpp
and
imcc -o x.x gen.imc
on my system, the g++ compiler does eventually finish, but the imcc
compiler is eventually killed.
Maybe this could be used to drive out the underlying problems that
are keeping parrot from compiling Dan's really large subs?
Regards,
-- Gregor
Gregor N.
I just got my setup working here in my new home town of Seattle, WA
and I noticed we are about to release a new Parrot. I wanted to make
sure Jako was working right, but there has aparently been some
changes to imcc that make its output unacceptable now.
In an attempt to get up to speed on what is
Andy --
I didn't see anything wrong in the code, but I added some parens.
Let me know if you still have trouble...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 08:51, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Solaris 8, with Sun's supplied perl5.00503 and with Sun's cc, I get the
> following error when trying t
I threw to the list in case someone
has the tuits to fix the examples.
I really don't think we should ship with broken examples. They
should be fixed or removed if it isn't worth it...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 21:04, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Sep-18, Gregor N. Purdy wr
All --
I don't understand how .globalconst fits in with the IMCC policy
of everything being in a .sub.
The Jako compiler emits stuff like this right now (in my sandbox).
It used to emit the constants as .const right where the were found
lexically, but I've introduced code motion to collect all in
003-09-20 at 12:59, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All --
>
> > It used to emit the constants as .const right where the were found
> > lexically, but I've introduced code motion to collect all inline
> > code in
Luke --
Need it *actually* stick them in the array? Or, could it
just provide an array-like interface to the underlying
registers? Thats cheaper, especially if not all args are
going to get accessed.
Explaining how such a thing works to an optimizer that
wants to know when registers are being acc
All --
I've got some diffs in my sandbox that I thought I had submitted
at one point, but I can't find any evidence of them being submitted,
so I'll open discussion here.
The first change is that the prototype for string_to_cstring()
becomes:
char *
string_to_cstring(struct Parrot_Interp * i
Nick --
Looks like I'm the guilty party. I do tend to do this
every now and again, even though I don't consider myself
thoughtless or careless.
I think sometimes I get focused on my local changes and
as I'm testing and committing it just isn't natural to
consider that a change in something that *
Nicholas --
I'd be happy with that...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 09:12, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:48:55AM -0700, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> > The next change is a change to the IO layer. In include/parrot/io.h
> > we change struct _Parr
On a related note, I wonder how all this fits in with
methods and multimethods?
If we consider the current trig.ops as being equivalent
to, e.g. (expressed with approximate Perl 6 isms):
multi sub sin(Num $arg) : returns Num;
multi sub cos(Num $arg) : returns Num;
And, at some level I do
Andy --
Thanks. That was a strange one. No complaint by my Perl, even with
"use warnings 'all';", but its definitely a typo (and now fixed, too).
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 06:21, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>
&g
Dan --
Here's a first version that works with the regular core.
You have to explicitly define PARANOID, or the added code
won't get compiled.
I imagine this will have to be adapted to work with the other
core types, but I wanted to throw this out as a starting point.
I'll leave it up to you whet
Leo --
Thanks for taking the time to review and comment.
> > Here's a first version that works with the regular core.
>
> > You have to explicitly define PARANOID, or the added code
> > won't get compiled.
>
> It IMHO should be a separate run core, which can be switched to,
> whenever safe exec
I just put together an entry on predereferencing in the glossary,
with pointers to info on various events in its history.
I don't remember if it was a recent summary or what, but someone
pointed out there was no such entry. Sorry I can't find the
original email to notify you directly, but I hope y
The optimizer could hoist the construct out of the loop...
Assuming it can realize its possible to do that.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 01:14, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I realize my example is incorrect. =-)
>
> > Is there any reason no
I have a PCC sub:
.pcc_sub _char_is_white_space prototyped
.param int c # Character to test (as an integer representing its ASCII
code)
Is there any good reason why prototyped PCC subs
shouldn't be callable with IMC syntax that looks like
a macro call, without having to make a macro wrapper
manually? (I know its not the way it works now, but
you can almost simulate it with a PCC sub def and a
macro, and it seems to me it would be n
ocal str s
and then
c = ord(s)
or
ord(c, s)
in my .imc file, neither works. Do I need to do magic to
use any old op I want?
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 11:42, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any good
s a PMC not a string.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 12:15, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy writes:
> > Leo --
> >
> > The Jako compiler spits stuff out from Perl.
> >
> > I'm writing some new experimental stuff in PIR directly.
> >
> >
> the xml header is only for the top level thing in the serialized
> tree. if it is nonstandard you have to mark the serialized string so you
> can call the matching thaw methods. each object in the serialized tree
> will have to support that method or some code has to be supplied to
> handle all
Here's a suggestion for some upcoming release: Brass Parrot.
http://www.avonpage.com/brassparrot.html
http://usvi.diningguide.net/data/d100132.htm
Maybe a deep-winter release, so us folks in the Northern
hemisphere can think pleasant tropical thoughts about St. Croix...
Regards,
-- Gregor
-
I just committed a few new glossary entries for folks reading
the summaries: IMC, IMCC, Packfile, PBC, PIR.
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
Umm.. Do you mean:
package Foo::Bar;
sub new {
my $class = shift;
return bless { jo => 42 }, $class;
}
sub prnJoe {
my $self = shift;
print $self->{jo}, "\n";
}
package main;
$f = Foo::Bar->new();
$f->prnJoe();
--
Luke --
I guess it might be nice to just do that with a block...
my $n;
while { $n++; @accum } < $total {
...;
}
since we already have a nice do-this-then-do-this syntax.
Sure, it looks a little weird in a for loop:
for ($i = 0; $i < $X; { $i++; some_func() }) {
...;
}
but
This made me think of one of my Gregor's Word of the Week entries,
but when I went looking for it, I realized that it was in the list
of potential future entries, not on the live site.
So, I went ahead and used this occasion to select trichotillomania
for Word of the Week for 2004-01-03:
http://w
I saw the report that Jako wasn't working right with the latest
Parrot, so I went to investigate.
I was running the various languages/jako/examples and I ran
across this oddity (after doing a fresh 'make' of Parrot and
in the languages/jako directory):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jako]$ ./jako examples/fac
Jako is in a mostly working state. I just checked in a couple of minor
cleanups:
* Disable languages/jako/examples/sub.jako, since Parrot / IMCC
don't support .global int x
* Change languages/jako/examples/pmc.jako to preallocate a nice
PerlString PMC before attempting to set to a st
First, thanks Damian for doing this, and good show!
Smylers already pointed out a few errors in the document, but
here are a few others I noticed:
* In "Why, how now, ho! From whence ariseth this?"
We have this near the top:
type FormArgs ::= Str|Array|Pair;
and this be
In "From the crown of his head to the sole of his foot..." (clearly
a reference to a Gilligan's Island episode where Lovey said something
similar :), we have:
:header{ ..., odd => "Act, $act, Scene $scene...", ... }
and below, text indicating that it will
"prepend the act and scene infor
In the section "He doth fill fields..." we see an example of Fill
Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
spaces needed does not divide evenly into the number of interstices.
In the section "More particulars
In "Thou shalt have my best gown to make thee a pair...", we are
given a reason to use the option syntax vs. the pair constructing
fat comma C<< => >>: "...we're guaranteed that the key of the
resulting pair is a string, that the string [...] contains a valid
identifier, and that the compiler can c
In "And now at length they overflow their banks." its not clear
how an overflow field gets tied to its initial non-overflow field.
In the recipe example given, how does it know to go with the
$method field instead of the $prep_time field? Is it basing off
of matching the horizontal extent of the in
The Exegesis mentions the Perl6::Slurp module, but I don't see it
on CPAN. Is it just a race condition?
Regards,
-- Gregor
--
Gregor Purdy[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc. http://www.focusresearch.com/
lidity before the program starts"
But, since E7 doesn't come right out and say it, I'm asking for
clarification. Still could be that you are right and there is nothing
to see here, though...
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 07:46, Smylers wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy writes:
ctly*? Is it an error,
does it have some heuristics to guess? What are the edge cases?
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 07:39, Smylers wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy writes:
>
> > In "And now at length they overflow their banks." its not clear
> > how an overflow fie
onway wrote:
> Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>
> > In the section "He doth fill fields..." we see an example of Fill
> > Justification where two spaces fit between every word. This doesn't
> > give us an idea of how spaces are distributed if the number of
> > sp
nning parrot on 'foo.pasm' generated from 'foo.imc'
* Running parrot on 'foo.pbc' generated from 'foo.pasm'
since I'd think that the later cases would be mirroring what is going
on inside parrot in the earlier ones. Where am I going wrong?
Regards,
--
Larry --
So, will "mutatingness" be a context we'll be able to inquire on
in the implementation of a called routine? Or, could we provide
a specialized distinct implementation for mutating that would get
called if .=X() is used? If we are performing some operation on
large data, and we know the en
For me, (vim 6.2), that is
< < to get «
> > to get »
after doing
:set digraph
(list of available digraphs can be seen by :digraph)
But, I find the above a bit unnerving because I've deleted
the character, and then if I type a certain character next
I haven't.
Vim also allows
< < t
Oh, and the form doesn't require you to do the
:set digraph thing. Its always available.
Regards,
-- Gregor
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 06:16, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> For me, (vim 6.2), that is
>
> < < to get «
> > > to get »
>
> after doing
>
&g
I don't know about the continuation stuff, but you can't assume that
running imc --> pasm --> exec does the same thing as imc --> exec. I
ran into that before, and I don't think its going to get fixed until
the new imcc lands, at which point old-school pasm might even be
gone (although I don't know
All --
I have committed the revised op tracing patch I posted earlier.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy
milar to the
jar utility we have to call it packrat (rat for short), and use the
.rat extension? :-)
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purd
,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beck
compiler generates.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203
e
the assembler patch.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.
(0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox
West Chester, OH 45069 513-860-3579 fax
\_/
chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox
West Chester, OH 45069 513-860-3579 fax
\_/
/jako/
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203
program can be exhibited.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
808
here.
Maybe that's because its an EX-parrot!
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/compdiff/norwegia.jpg
http://www.pythonet.org/pet-shop.html
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4
___
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203
ere broken before
> the assembler patch.
I just committed these changes.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy
All --
I have renamed the Jako compiler from jako_compiler.pl to jakoc.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy
oy!
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203
le language support for them without
much fluff. You may like to play with it.
I'd still like to have a good macro assembler underlying things.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 9
s by the different object file formats. Maybe we don't
have to invent yet another one.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy
rying this out?
Dan? Does this fly in the face of your overall design, or is this
a good thing?
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
rl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Focus Research, Inc.http://www.focusresearch.com/
8080 Beckett Center Drive #203 513-860-3570 vox
West Ch
tial matching if you specified some
qualifiers, such as "add_i I4, I4, 3" mapping to "add_i_ic I4, I4, 3".
Anyway, enjoy.
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)
which adds a simple jsr/ret implementation)
Probably it would be best to wait. But my Impatience is showing...
Regards,
-- Gregor
_
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purd
>%d.\n", $line);
> +printf(STDERR "jako: Syntax error. Unrecognized condition in if on line %d.\n",
>$line);
>}
> }
>
>
--
_________
/ perl -e 'srand(-2091643526); print chr rand 90 for (0..4)' \
Gregor N. Purdy
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
