# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #59372]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59372 >
in r31436 the test t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.t fails on my
computer when called
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #59382]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59382 >
22:35 < moritz_> rakudo: my $a = { a => 42 }; say 1; $a = [ 0 ]; say 2
22:35 < p6eval> ra
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #59394]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59394 >
Hello.
There is implementation of Pair.pairs. +3 passed tests in "S29-hash/pairs.t"
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #59396]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59396 >
Hello.
There is implementation of Hash.reverse
--
Bacek
diff --git a/languages/pe
Vasily Chekalkin (via RT) wrote:
> There is implementation of Hash.reverse
Thanks, applied as r22430. (But put method in alphabetical order)
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://perlgeek.de/ | http://perl-6.de/ | http://sudokugarden.de/
2008/9/24 Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:09:37PM +0200, François Perrad wrote:
>> Currently, the bigger issue in Lua on Parrot is lexical or upvalue in
>> Lua jargon (the reason for Lua on Parrot is not really Lua).
>> The following Lua code doesn't give the ex
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:05:32AM -0700, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> in r31436 the test t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.t fails on my
> computer when called through make (ie 'make spectest_regression' or
> 'make t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.t', but succeeds if the
> corresponding .rakudo file is
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:18:21AM -0700, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There is implementation of Pair.pairs. +3 passed tests in "S29-hash/pairs.t"
>
> +$P0 = get_hll_namespace ['Perl6Pair']
> +'!EXPORT'('pairs', $P0)
It's probably wrong to export 'pairs' here -- the exported pai
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:31:08AM -0700, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
> # Please include the string: [perl #59396]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59396 >
>
>
> Hell
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> It feels a little weird to have 'reverse' as an exported symbol
> here. Based on S29, the exports on 'reverse' mean that we get:
>
> my $str = 'abc';
> say reverse $str; # cba
> say reverse $str, 5; # 2abc
5abc
> my %hash
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:25:06AM -0700, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
> On Sat Sep 27 05:47:14 2008, bacek wrote:
> > Small proxy class to support lvalue semantic of Str.substr. Holds
> > original string, start, len. In get_string method returns substring. In
> > infix:= construct new string and as
It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also
makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives,
to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish.
Just my 2 cents.
-Jason "s1n" Switzer
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:27 AM, M
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #59400]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59400 >
Hello.
Small proxy class to support lvalue semantic of Str.substr. Holds
original
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:25:06AM -0700, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
On Sat Sep 27 05:47:14 2008, bacek wrote:
Small proxy class to support lvalue semantic of Str.substr. Holds
original string, start, len. In get_string method returns substring. In
infix:= const
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #59398]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59398 >
Hello.
For consistency sake (and removing many dummy proxy methods)
--
Bacek.
com
# New Ticket Created by Stephen Weeks
# Please include the string: [perl #59410]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59410 >
This patch adds support for handling CONTROL_LOOP_NEXT exceptions in
pct-generated for
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:18:21AM -0700, Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
Hello.
There is implementation of Pair.pairs. +3 passed tests in "S29-hash/pairs.t"
+$P0 = get_hll_namespace ['Perl6Pair']
+'!EXPORT'('pairs', $P0)
It's probably wrong to export 'pairs'
On Thu Sep 25 14:18:40 2008, julianalbo wrote:
> > I suspect the problem is that the integer "greater than" operation
> > is performing a subtraction between the two (signed long) values
> > being compared, but the result of the subtraction is outside of
> > the range of signed longs.
>
> Correct.
Hello.
Simplified implementation of Pair.pairs. moritz++ for pointing on it.
--
Bacek
commit 71b6abede127eaa73c4ea32b00ee21150793a7f2
Author: Vasily Chekalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat Sep 27 23:04:17 2008 +1000
Implement Pair.pairs
diff --git a/languages/perl6/src/classes/Pair.pir b
19 matches
Mail list logo
