On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 12:08:21AM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> r30166:
> $ perl6 -e '99[1]'
> get_pmc_keyed() not implemented in class 'Integer'
> [...]
> $ perl6 -e '100[1]'
> get_pmc_keyed() not implemented in class 'Float'
> [...]
>
> So:
>
> * For some reason, a literal integer followe
On Mon Aug 11 16:21:07 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> src/main.o(.text+0x5c): In function `main':
> src/main.c:52: undefined reference to `Parrot_new'
> src/main.o(.text+0x6a):src/main.c:53: undefined reference to
> `imcc_initialize'
> src/main.o(.text+0x86):src/main.c:58: undefined reference to
On Wed Aug 13 10:41:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Does this patch help?
Almost, you just missed the executable itself (-o arg). This patch
works for me.
- Andrew
Index: solaris.pm
===
--- solaris.pm (revision 30211)
+++ so
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 02:32:29AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: AFAICT, according to the grammar it's valid standard Perl 6 syntax.
At least in pugs, 42[0] is legal, and produces the value 42, on
the theory that anything can be considered a list of 1 item, and
if you use something as a list,
What's the general feeling about this proposal?
Any thoughts of the architect?
kjs
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:47 PM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
> # Please include the string: [perl #57634]
> # in the subject line of all future corre
What's the general feeling about this proposal?
Any thoughts of the architect?
thanks,
kjs
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> From: "Andrew Whitworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:36:16 -0400
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Bob Rog
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Aug 11 16:21:07 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> src/main.o(.text+0x5c): In function `main':
>> src/main.c:52: undefined reference to `Parrot_new'
>> src/main.o(.text+0x6a):src/main.c:53: undefined reference
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
> On Mon Aug 11 16:21:07 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > src/main.o(.text+0x5c): In function `main':
> > src/main.c:52: undefined reference to `Parrot_new'
> > src/main.o(.text+0x6a):src/main.c:53: undefined reference to
> > `imcc_initialize'
>
I discovered a small p5ism in S02. Patch below. (My copy of S02 might be
a bit out of date, though. Sorry, I've been offline for a while).
--- Syntax.pod.old 2008-08-13 19:48:21.0 +0200
+++ Syntax.pod 2008-08-13 19:48:25.0 +0200
@@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@
qw /a b c/;
Carl MXXsak (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
> # Please include the string: [perl #57790]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57790 >
>
>
> r30166:
> $ perl6 -e '99[1]'
> get_pmc_key
Segfault moved. It's no longer occurring when run from inside
languages/tcl, but now at the top of the build dir, I get the following
backtrace when running
./parrot_debugger languages/tcl/tcl.pbc
and hitting "n" at the pdb prompt.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57930]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57930 >
not ok 1 - Line length ok
# Failed test 'Line length ok'
# at t/codingstd/linelength.
I've posted the task list for the MMD branch to the wiki:
http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?pdd27mmd_tasklist
There's really only one task: merge the two MMD implementations into
one. But, I've split it out into a series of smaller tasks so we can
share the work and track progress
Colleagues,
Since there have been no comments one way or another, I will apply this
patch in the next 24-36 hours unless some provides a good reason otherwise.
Thank you very much.
Thanks. Am close to submitting a patch. Anyone who wants to kibitz
should check out the 'opsrenum' branch from SVN.
15 matches
Mail list logo
