What's the general feeling about this proposal? Any thoughts of the architect?
thanks, kjs On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > From: "Andrew Whitworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:36:16 -0400 > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Bob Rogers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But there's a concat_p_p_p op, so "+" is ambiguous. In general, it > > seems best to use distinct tokens for distinct operations, rather than > > depending on register types, so that extending the set of register > types > > for a given op doesn't introduce ambiguities by the back door. > > I forgot about that opcode, so "+" is out. We don't have another use > for "..", do we have another one for "~"? > > bxor (binary XOR). ".." seems unproblematic. > > -- Bob >
