Moritz (>):
> Or maybe even enumerate the roadmap entries, and then use these to list
> interdepencies (for example numbers for entries and letters for footnotes).
Were we to do this consistently enough, there's always the added bonus
of writing a simple filter into dot, getting a dependency graph
Hi,
on behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce the release of
Parrot 0.6.4
"St. Vincent Amazon."
Parrot 0.6.4 is available via CPAN, or follow the download
instructions at http://parrotcode.org/source.html. For those who would
like to develop on
Parrot, or help develop Parrot itsel
Hi,
for Parrot 0.6.4 following Perl 5 modules were not indexed:
Parrot::Configure::Options::Test::Prepare
Parrot::Pmc2c::PMC::PrintTree
Parrot::Test::Util::Runloop
Parrot::SearchOps
It looks like co-maintainership needs to be given the release managers.
Regards,
Bernhard
Today bacek++ implement complex logarithms in rakudo, and one of the
tests failed because it assumed the result to be on a different complex
plane. (log(-1i) returned 0- 1.5708i, while 0 + 3/2*1i was expected).
Should we standardize on one complex plane (for example -pi <= $c.angle
< pi like Compl
The file .parrot_current_rev is missing in the Release, and also the
revision is nowhere
mentioned in any Release Note, not the ChangeLog and not in news.
This is annoying, because you don't know if a particular bugfix is
included or not.
Worse, the logic the set the current revision for svn updat
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56948]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56948 >
Forward to RT so a ticket is opened.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rein
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The file .parrot_current_rev is missing in the Release, and also the
> revision is nowhere
> mentioned in any Release Note, not the ChangeLog and not in news.
> This is annoying, because you don't know if a particular bugfix
Forwarding Jerry's followup to the ticket.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: .parrot_current_rev
To: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Reini Urban <[EM
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, via RT Will Coleda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM
> Subject: .parrot_current_rev
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Worse, the logic the set the current revisi
On Wed Oct 24 14:23:23 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/pmc/resizeablebooleanarray.t there is the todo item:
>
> TODO: {
> local $TODO = "this is broken";
>
> pasm_output_is( <<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "clone" );
>
> Which is to say, fix cloning in ResizableBooleanArrays or fix the test (or
> both?)
It
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #56944]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56944 >
Rakudo r29470:
$ ../../parrot perl6.pbc -e 'say (1+1).WHAT'
Num
$ ../../parrot perl6.pbc
This got warnocked for 0.6.4
rename the debugger, not the disassembler.
--
Reini Urban
Michael Peters wrote:
> Here's some more patches to improve things. It adds the following:
>
> + require TAP::Harness::Archive 0.10 so we can add extra_properties to our
> TAP
> archives.
> + Collect Architecture, Compiler, DEVEL, Optimize, Perl Version, Platform,
> SVN
> Revision an
It may also be relevant that on the Windows box where I
run the smoke tests, my ".svn" directories are actually
"_svn".
http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/asp-dot-net-hack.txt
---
tjh
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, via RT Will Coleda
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -- For
Reminder:
This got warnocked for 0.6.4
--
Reini Urban
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Reini Urban via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This got warnocked for 0.6.4
>
> rename the debugger, not the disassembler.
I don't like the name parrot_pdb. 'parrot Parrot DeBugger' ? Looks redundant.
I'll vote for parrot_debug
--
Salu2
Bernhard Schmalhofer a écrit :
Hi,
on behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce the release of
Parrot 0.6.4
"St. Vincent Amazon."
As usual, the Windows setup is available on
http://parrotwin32.sourceforge.net/
François.
Parrot 0.6.4 is available via CPAN, or follow the download
Will Coleda via RT schrieb:
On Tue May 13 05:21:32 2008, rurban wrote:
2008/5/13 Andrew Whitworth via RT :
is this ticket (#51944) resolved? I don't see any outstanding todo
items
here that need to be considered further, and the submitted patch
has
already been applied. Can we close this,
NotFound schrieb:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Reini Urban via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This got warnocked for 0.6.4
rename the debugger, not the disassembler.
I don't like the name parrot_pdb. 'parrot Parrot DeBugger' ? Looks redundant.
I'll vote for parrot_debug
Note that I list
I fixed the problem in r29488, but I don't have any windows
environment available to test.
--
Salu2
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #56958]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=56958 >
Tcl used to rely on this particular HLL mapping working, but it seems
to have vanished at
Author: bernhard
Date: Tue Jul 15 12:47:34 2008
New Revision: 29494
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[docs] Add escape sequence \" in double quoted strings.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod
===
Author: allison
Date: Tue Jul 15 12:54:30 2008
New Revision: 29495
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd] Clarification on literal strings from #parrotsketch meeting.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd19_pir.pod
=
>> I don't like the name parrot_pdb. 'parrot Parrot DeBugger' ? Looks
>> redundant.
After some discussion in #parrotsketch, the name parrot_debugger wins.
--
Salu2
> After some discussion in #parrotsketch, the name parrot_debugger wins.
Done in r29496, waiting for comments and fixes before closing the ticket.
--
Salu2
Hi,
I just saw that and such (too late) at #parrotsketch:
21:52 < NotFound> So unicode:"\xab" and utf8:unicode:"\xab" is also the same
result?
In my opinion and (AFAIK still in the implementation) is it that the encoding
bit of PIR is how the possibly escaped bytes are specifying the codepoi
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:23PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> 21:51 < pmichaud> so unicode:"«" and unicode:"\xab" would produce
> exactly
> the same result.
> 21:51 < pmichaud> even down to being the same .pbc output.
> 21:51 < allison> pmichaud: exactly
>
> The former is a valid char
> unicode:"\ab" is illegal
No way. "Unicode" "\ab" should represent U+00AB. I don't care what
the byte-level representation is. In UTF-8, that's 0xc2 0xab; in
UTF-16BE it's 0x00 00ab; in UTF-32LE it's 0xab 0x00 0x00 0x00.
> I think that there is still some confusion between the encoding of sou
Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 23:35 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:23PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > 21:51 < pmichaud> so unicode:"«" and unicode:"\xab" would produce
> > exactly the same result.
> > 21:51 < pmichaud> even down to being the same .pbc output.
> >
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMESHO, the encoding of the source code should have no bearing on the
> interpretation of string literal escape sequences within that source
> code. "\ab" should mean U+00AB no matter whether the surrounding
> source code
Uhm, by the fact that they didn't type "\ab65" ?
On 7/15/08, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. Juli 2008 23:35 schrieb Patrick R. Michaud:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:23PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> > 21:51 < pmichaud> so unicode:"«" and unicode:"\xab"
To open another can of worms, I think that we can live without
character set specification. We can stablish that the character set is
always unicode, and to deal only with encodings. Ascii is an encoding
that maps directly to codepoints and only allows 0-127 values.
iso-8859-1 is the same with 0-25
NotFound wrote:
> To open another can of worms, I think that we can live without
> character set specification. We can stablish that the character set is
> always unicode, and to deal only with encodings.
We had that discussion already, and the answer was "no" for several reasons:
* Strings might
> * Unicode isn't necessarily universal, or might stop to be so in future.
> If a character is not representable in Unicode, and you chose to use
> Unicode for everything, you're screwed
There are provision for private usage codepoints.
> * related to the previous point, some other character enco
NotFound wrote:
>> * Unicode isn't necessarily universal, or might stop to be so in future.
>> If a character is not representable in Unicode, and you chose to use
>> Unicode for everything, you're screwed
>
> There are provision for private usage codepoints.
If we use them in parrot, we can't us
Jon Lang wrote:
So you're suggesting that
A op* n
should map to
[op] A xx n
I don't think that that mapping works for Thomas' proposal of a
repetition count on post-increment operator. I.e.
$a ++* 3
is not the same as
[++] $a xx 3
(which I think is a syntax error)
and also not
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM
> Subject: .parrot_current_rev
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> The file .parrot_current_rev is missing in the Release, and also the
> revision is nowhere
> mentioned in any Rel
Dave Whipp wrote:
> Jon Lang wrote:
>
>> So you're suggesting that
>>
>> A op* n
>>
>> should map to
>>
>> [op] A xx n
>>
>
> I don't think that that mapping works for Thomas' proposal of a repetition
> count on post-increment operator. I.e.
>
> $a ++* 3
>
> is not the same as
>
> [++] $a xx 3
Applied in r29499. Marking ticket resolved.
Applied in r29499. Marking ticket resolved.
Since I have not heard back from the OP, have not been able to reproduce
the test failure and have not seen it failing on smoke test reports, I
am going to close this ticket.
Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
Hi,
for Parrot 0.6.4 following Perl 5 modules were not indexed:
Parrot::Configure::Options::Test::Prepare
Parrot::Pmc2c::PMC::PrintTree
Barney: I know that I wrote the two modules above (or, at least,
refactored them into their current form). What, if anything,
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 17:23:20 James E Keenan wrote:
> Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> > for Parrot 0.6.4 following Perl 5 modules were not indexed:
> >
> > Parrot::Configure::Options::Test::Prepare
> > Parrot::Pmc2c::PMC::PrintTree
>
> Barney: I know that I wrote the two modules above (or, at l
i seem to recall that we agreed instead to noindex the Parrot::
modules... Nobody is expected to use them outside parrot anyway.
On 7/15/08, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 17:23:20 James E Keenan wrote:
>
>> Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
>
>> > for Parrot 0.6.4 follow
Seems to be broken as of r29503.
nmake realclean (.parrot_current_rev is deleted)
svn update
perl Configure.pl
.parrot_current_rev contains "0"
Also, if I run Configure.pl again, the timestamp on the file does not
change.
--
tjh
On Jul 15, 2008, at 1:26 PM, NotFound wrote:
I fixed th
Kealey, Martin, wrote:
> Nice idea; introduces one particular ambiguity though: would
>
> $m ** $n
>
> then be
>
> pow($m, $n)
>
> or
>
> pow($n, $m)
>
> ?
Neither. As with the reducing meta-operator, you would need to have
the ability to define an operator that takes precedence over a meta'd
For r29488, what I observe (on Windows) is that
* Configure.pl generates .parrot_current_rev with the correct
revision number (but this is broken in r29503 -- see my earlier
message)
* Configure.pl does update .parrot_current_rev when the file
already exists, provided the revision numb
Starting in r29489, .parrot_current_rev contains "0" instead of the
revision number.
--
tjh
On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Tim Heckman wrote:
Seems to be broken as of r29503.
nmake realclean (.parrot_current_rev is deleted)
svn update
perl Configure.pl
.parrot_current_rev contains "0"
Can somebody give me a working link on how to installs pugs or parrot on
win xp?
I have downloaded from http://jnthn.net/perl6/ both
http://jnthn.net/perl6/pugs-win32.zip
http://jnthn.net/perl6/parrot-win32.zip
after extracting the pugs-win32..
I tried to double-click on pugs.exe but I got the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:32 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Worse, the logic the set the current revision for svn updates is
>> wrong.
> No, the logic was correct. As particle said on #parrot yesterday,
> ".parrot_current_rev should always reflect the last time you ran 'per
2008/7/15 Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Will Coleda via RT schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue May 13 05:21:32 2008, rurban wrote:
>>>
>>> 2008/5/13 Andrew Whitworth via RT >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
is this ticket (#51944) resolved? I don't see any outstanding todo
>>>
>>> items
here that
51 matches
Mail list logo
