John M. Dlugosz wrote:
> I'm taking a stab at turning the S\d\d documents into a formal standard.
That's certainly a nice idea, and much work. ++ for taking it.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue Mar 25 18:53:43 2008, coke wrote:
> On Mon Feb 04 21:01:55 2008, coke wrote:
> > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14094
> >
>
> No reply from the maintainer, so I opened a port abandoned ticket.
>
> https://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14803
I was just
On Wed Apr 09 06:41:15 2008, coke wrote:
> On Tue Mar 25 18:53:43 2008, coke wrote:
> > On Mon Feb 04 21:01:55 2008, coke wrote:
> > > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14094
> > >
> >
> > No reply from the maintainer, so I opened a port abandoned ticket.
> >
> > https://trac.m
On Wed Apr 09 06:43:09 2008, coke wrote:
> On Wed Apr 09 06:41:15 2008, coke wrote:
> > On Tue Mar 25 18:53:43 2008, coke wrote:
> > > On Mon Feb 04 21:01:55 2008, coke wrote:
> > > > http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14094
> > > >
> > >
> > > No reply from the maintainer, so I
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
It's also possible I'm just nuts, and slice context should be a purely
run-time activity.
Reading your explanation of array slice context I missed an
answer to the question how the shape of an array is split
into the contexts of functions called inside .[]. I guess
the
# New Ticket Created by Andreas Rottmann
# Please include the string: [perl #52664]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52664 >
The attached patch fixes quoting - only chars, numbers strings and
booleans are sel
# New Ticket Created by Andreas Rottmann
# Please include the string: [perl #52662]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=52662 >
The attached patch implements the BEGIN Scheme syntax.
Implement BEGIN
From: Andr
The quoting.patch contained a spurious change to t/harness; the new, attached
patch fixes this.
Implement quotating, and make () (without quote) a syntax error
From: Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
languages/eclectus/compiler.scm | 92 ---
lang
I've gone ahead and applied the "null $P0" patch above (thanks!) -- it's
not exactly correct but it's less wrong than other alternatives at the
moment.
I suspect the correct approach will be to eliminate the existing global
vars and turn them into attributes on the PAST::Compiler object. But
I'll
On Fri Apr 04 22:28:31 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2008 11:22:16 Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > First, deep inside IMCC_subst_constants() in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c,
> > when the divide by zero fails, it returns a NULL value, but forgets to
> > also set the undocumented "
On Sun Apr 06 13:13:20 2008, infinoid wrote:
>
> * Honestly, I'm not really sure print_c_source_top and
> print_c_source_bottom need to be public methods any more. In fact, they
> could be merged into print_c_source_file entirely.
True, but ...
> But separating the
> filehandling from the pri
Coke reports satisfaction. Resolving the ticket.
Coke voted for auto::macports, so that's what we're going with for now.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> On Fri Apr 04 22:28:31 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 April 2008 11:22:16 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> >
> > > parrot-andy/compilers/imcc/optimizer.c ---
> > > parrot-svn/compilers/imcc/optimizer.c 2008-03-31 15:14:39.0
> -
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>
> > On Fri Apr 04 22:28:31 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thursday 03 April 2008 11:22:16 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > >
>
> > > > parrot-andy/compilers/imcc/optimize
Patch was okayed by Coke and applied to trunk in r26888.
Parrot::Revision now only handles svn.
Patch committed to trunk in r26892.
I've been working hard on re-organizing the S\d\d docs and other lore into a
technical
specification with an outline suitable for the contents.
But lately I've done some "original work" on what strong typing means and the
detailed
semantics of having types.
So, please take a look at section 10
By eliminating use of the svn revision number anywhere past Configure.pl
(r26888), we eliminate the need for t/postconfigure/03 and 04. Hence,
the tests will no longer cause any hangs on Feather!
On Wed Mar 12 18:19:12 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Mar 12 12:09:05 2008, ambs wrote:
> > At the moment GMP is being detected.
> >
> > I just copied some code from the detection of readline. Probably we will
> > want a macports.pm module under auto to reuse these functions.
> >
> > amb
RT 52154 has been resolved, so I'm resolving this as well.
Applied to trunk in r52528; resolving ticket.
There was no patch pending for this ticket, so I changed its tag from
PATCH to TODO. Also marked its status as Stalled.
On Wed Apr 09 20:04:20 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 'make' failure at r26898; log attached.
>
Possibly related to r26896.
Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
purpose, like
BEGIN
END
INIT
CATCH
etc.
What do you call those? They are not even "special named blocks"
because that is not the block name (that already means something).
--John
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:31 AM, John M. Dlugosz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
> purpose, like
>
> BEGIN
> END
> INIT
> CATCH
> etc.
>
> What do you call those? They are not even "special named blocks" because
> that is no
JMD> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
JMD> purpose, like
JMD>
JMD> BEGIN
JMD> END
JMD> INIT
JMD> CATCH
JMD> etc.
JMD>
JMD> What do you call those?
Well, lessee. The Common Lisp spec calls them "situations" in the
definition of (eval-when)...
JMD> They
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JMD> Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
> JMD> purpose, like
> JMD>
> JMD> BEGIN
> JMD> END
> JMD> INIT
> JMD> CATCH
> JMD> etc.
> JMD>
> JMD> What do you call those?
>
> W
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Chas. Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like they already have a name in S04: Closure traits*.
>
> * http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S04.html#Closure_traits
I don't know, it seems like any value might happen to both be a
closure and have traits
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Chas. Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like they already have a name in S04: Closure traits*.
> >
> > * http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S04.html#Closure_traits
>
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
