# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #50894]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50894 >
Currently we can't run Parrot with certain IMCC optimizations (by setting
TEST_PROG_ARGS,
On Thursday 14 February 2008 18:16:03 Jerry Gay wrote:
> 'cotto' on #parrot came to me with a problem today. he is unable to
> call VTABLE_is_equal(...) inside a .pmc file. i'll use
> src/pmc/exporter.pmc as an example pmc file, because i know its
> internals. here's a patch:
>
> Index: src/pmc/ex
# New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
# Please include the string: [perl #50882]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50882 >
Fixed two compile-time warnings in spf_render.c.
1) redefinition of snprintf macr
S02 says "A bare closure also interpolates in double-quotish context."
I presume that there are no restrictions on the code inside that
closure, but all the examples I've seen have nothing but expressions
inside the closure (though some examples, admittedly, do invoke subs
and/or methods).
Forgot the patch in the last email.
--Andrew Whitworth
exceptions_c.patch
Description: Binary data
# New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
# Please include the string: [perl #50880]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50880 >
Fixed a warning in src/exceptions.c. the dumpcore() macro already
contains an exit
# New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
# Please include the string: [perl #50886]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50886 >
..forgot the patch, again. I'll get better at this, i swear.
--Andrew Whitworth
S02 provides this example for treating curlies literally in a quoted string:
qq:!c "Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies";
But can I escape them with a backslash? I was surprised that I couldn't
find anything in S02 which said either yes or no. Perhaps this falls
under the heading of "
# New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
# Please include the string: [perl #50884]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50884 >
I fixed a few compile-time warnings in src/spf_vtable.c,
src/threads.c, and src/st
I *should* be there, though IIRC, Allison will not.
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Andy Lester wrote:
I see that Allison's going to be at Frozen Perl. Will you be hackathonning?
Anyone else going to be there besides me?
I'm not sure I'll be sticking around for the hackathon, especially if I don't
hea
On Thu Feb 14 08:26:05 2008, pmichaud wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:29:25PM -0800, Will Coleda wrote:
> > compilers/nqp/t/01-literals.t, for example, has a shebang of:
> >
> > #!./parrot
> >
> > but contains a test file written in NQP, not PIR.
> >
> > Before we can re-enable the pir_code_
On Fri, Feb 8, 2008 at 3:21 PM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
> # Please include the string: [perl #50646]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50646 >
tuxdna wrote:
src/oo.c:Parrot_remove_parent()
Why should anyone remove a parent of any class? I believe it will break the
hierarchy.
The default class system only allows you to modify the inheritance
hierarchy of a class by cloning the class. That means that any new
instances get the change
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 10:17:28 2008
New Revision: 14509
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
Tightened up rules on grammar-munging subs, must use term: or prefix:
Sigs of () and ($x) are no longer enough.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #50908]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50908 >
According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like
as of gcc 4.2.3 (bu
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 09:45:52 2008
New Revision: 14508
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
Some clarifications requested by jonathan++
Changed role-private attributes to be declared with my $!foo
The "has" declarator now explicitly always participates in composition
Modifie
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 14:54:28 2008
New Revision: 14510
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Clarification of identifier extensions requested by thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
==
--- do
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:16:02PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> S02 says "A bare closure also interpolates in double-quotish context."
>
> I presume that there are no restrictions on the code inside that closure,
> but all the examples I've seen have nothing but expressions inside the
> closure (th
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:51:21PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> S02 provides this example for treating curlies literally in a quoted string:
>
> qq:!c "Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies";
>
> But can I escape them with a backslash? I was surprised that I couldn't
> find anything in S02 wh
> +Despite the appearance as a subscripting form, these names are resolved
> +not at run time but at compile time. The pseudo-subscripts need not
> +be simple scalars. These are extended with the same two-element list:
> +
> +infix:
> +infix:['??','!!']
Huh. I thought that multipl
Author: larry
Date: Fri Feb 15 15:59:31 2008
New Revision: 14511
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
Log:
Clarification of backslash rules for non-interpolating chars for thom++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:59:28PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: > +Despite the appearance as a subscripting form, these names are resolved
: > +not at run time but at compile time. The pseudo-subscripts need not
: > +be simple scalars. These are extended with the same two-element list:
: > +
22 matches
Mail list logo
