On Thu Feb 14 08:26:05 2008, pmichaud wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:29:25PM -0800, Will Coleda wrote: > > compilers/nqp/t/01-literals.t, for example, has a shebang of: > > > > #!./parrot > > > > but contains a test file written in NQP, not PIR. > > > > Before we can re-enable the pir_code_coda test, these files need to be > > updated to have a proper shebang. > > Do we yet know what "a proper shebang" is for these cases? > > I suspect the #!./parrot shebang in the NQP test is simply > cruft left over from a previous test file -- I wouldn't have > any problem with removing it or changing it to something else. > > Pm >
Seems like the best short term fix here is to use "#!./parrot nqp.pbc" - the shebang is ignored during the test at the moment, but this indicates that the source should be run as NQP and not PIR. (once it is respected by the test harness or the OS.)
