On Sat Mar 17 23:51:04 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Jan 03 07:51:56 2007, coke wrote:
>
> > It would be nice if configure.pl gracefully handled the error
> condition > of "no compiler found".
>
> Here's a patch for that!
Patch applied in r17614. Thanks!
Greetings,
On Thu Mar 15 06:32:28 2007, particle wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Nuno Carvalho via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > here are some examples running the changed lexer:
> >
> > $ cat 1.pir
> > .sub main :main
> > .macro SpinForever (Count)
> > .local $LOOP: dec
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #41883]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41883 >
In lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PMETHODs.pm, the file name reported by gcc is
changed to be the PMET
On Sun Mar 18 04:05:41 2007, ptc wrote:
> On Sat Mar 17 23:51:04 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed Jan 03 07:51:56 2007, coke wrote:
> >
> > > It would be nice if configure.pl gracefully handled the error
> > condition > of "no compiler found".
> >
> > Here's a patch for that!
>
> Patch
I've now got access to a FreeBSD (6.1 PRERELEASE #4) box, and have
checked out and compiled Parrot. Attached is the output of 'make
test', and myconfig.
Regards,
Paul
myconfig
Description: Binary data
make_test.out
Description: Binary data
On Fri Feb 23 13:32:02 2007, kjs wrote:
> parrotbug seems to be broken on win32.
What output are you getting (if at all)?
Hello,
-> 1. Introduction
I am a programmer interested in the parrot vm. In my spare time I have
attempted several times to 'get into' parrot. This time I have
progressed much further, and in doing so I have developed a perspective
that is informed enough for me to hazard some input on the projec
On Saturday 17 March 2007 18:12, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Not to pass the buck or anything, but it wasn't me that wrote and
> checked in the test in the first place, I'm just working on the issue
> raised by the test. I'd prefer that you just ranted about issues rather
> than at/about individ
On Thu Mar 15 19:47:07 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a patch for doing this, at least a build, compile, and test
type
> patch. Instead of doing one massive patch to send, here's a script
to
> move the files(diffs include the entire file twice) and apply the
> patch. It moves all th
Hello,
I have been working on a gentoo ebuild for the parrot-0.4.9 release. I
have commented more extensively on the install target in a mail:
"the value of maintaining a working install target to the parrot project"
This ebuild is provided for reference in discussion of the points raised
in th
# New Ticket Created by Mike Mattie
# Please include the string: [perl #41889]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41889 >
Hello,
While mucking around in src/library.c I noticed some cut & paste duplication.
It
Mike Mattie (via RT) wrote:
While mucking around in src/library.c I noticed some cut & paste duplication.
It looked like a fairly simple hoist so I have attached the changes I made.
I do not have a win32 platform available for testing so I haven't been able to
compile test it.
while ( (cn
Made a few more text edits in r17591. Paul Cochrane's changes approved,
ticket resolved.
Noticed this still has the marker:
=head2 CHIP HAS EDITED THIS FAR INTO THE FILE
+---+
Everything below this point must still be reviewed
+---+
in it, despite being moved out of the cl
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #41885]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41885 >
Currently(and I don't know how long it's been going on, but it's
relatively new), but al
On Tue Feb 20 15:31:02 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 17 February 2007 08:27, jerry gay wrote:
>
> > as noted in my svn log at time of checkin, this is a failing test
> > which exposes a bug in Parrot::Distribution. '*.t' files are only
perl
> > files if the shebang says they are, b
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #41895]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41895 >
t/codingstd/perlcritic.t uses a non-standard argument parsing
mechanism. This should b
Author: paultcochrane
Date: Sat Mar 17 15:54:50 2007
New Revision: 17581
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Log:
[docs] Gleaned as much info as possible from docs/submissions.pod,
http://www.parrotcode.org/source.html and t/distro/file_metadata.t on the
topic of subversion propertie
# New Ticket Created by Alexandr Ciornii
# Please include the string: [perl #41884]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41884 >
Compilation with gcc/mingw32-make failed due to incorect value of
'slash' found by
David Green writes:
> In the meantime, Darren's proposal still raises a lot of interesting
> language questions. For example, how *do* you rename a hash key?
That's easy even in Perl 5. This modifies %hash in-place:
my @values = delete @[EMAIL PROTECTED];
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] = @values;
Whil
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41878]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41878 >
allison replaced the .IMPORT macro, used for importing pmcs into the
current namespace, wit
Currently(and I don't know how long it's been going on, but it's
relatively new), but all of the dynoplib tests and all of the dynpmc
tests fail on FreeBSD 6.0. All tests fail as a syntax error.
I can confirm this on FreeBSD 6.1 as well.
Paul
On Sunday 18 March 2007 07:41, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> I've now got access to a FreeBSD (6.1 PRERELEASE #4) box, and have
> checked out and compiled Parrot. Attached is the output of 'make
> test', and myconfig.
I have the t/stm/llqueue.t failure on my box and dug into it last night. The
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 10:38:14AM -0700, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> The main problem people seem to be having with parrotbug is in sending
> messages. Since one needs to be online to send messages (if and when
> it works) why not let people just use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then
> we can reserve
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #41896]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41896 >
at r17619, i'm unable to run make test, due to failures in p5rx tests.
actually, none of th
On 07/03/18 18:06 +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:51:32PM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> > parrotbug also has the save option, and it saves a lot of
> > configuration information. I'm asking if the "send" feature can be
> > removed, which is the bit which seems to be broke
On 18/03/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 18 March 2007 07:41, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> I've now got access to a FreeBSD (6.1 PRERELEASE #4) box, and have
> checked out and compiled Parrot. Attached is the output of 'make
> test', and myconfig.
I have the t/stm/llqueue.t
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:19:51PM -0700, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> The lcov tool from the Linux Test Project
> (http://ltp.sourceforge.net/coverage/lcov.readme.php) can be used to
> produce html output of code coverage information (I believe this looks
> similar to Devel::Cover's output). A 'make c
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:30:35 +
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> > Mike Mattie (via RT) wrote:
> > >While mucking around in src/library.c I noticed some cut & paste
> > >duplication. It looked like a fairly simp
Author: allison
Date: Sat Mar 17 22:06:26 2007
New Revision: 17591
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
Log:
[pdd]: A few edits to coding standards after addition of svn
properties text.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd07_codingstd.pod
==
On Mar 18, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Mike Mattie wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:30:35 +
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:35:14PM +, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Mike Mattie (via RT) wrote:
While mucking around in src/library.c I noticed some cut & paste
dupl
In Perl 5 land, the advantage of the perlbug program is that it captures
the output of perl -V, which is often invaluable in categorising or
identifying the cause of bugs. e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't always
have this.
perlbug has the option to save the bug report to a file, which can then
Mike Mattie (via RT) wrote:
While mucking around in src/library.c I noticed some cut & paste duplication.
It looked like a fairly simple hoist so I have attached the changes I made.
Needed a small fix (note: C89, declarations must come first in a block).
Did that, and it's now applied in r17
On Sunday 18 March 2007 10:06, Jerry Gay wrote:
> at r17619, i'm unable to run make test, due to failures in p5rx tests.
> actually, none of them are failing, but my system becomes
> non-responsive. after approximately test 200, tests (and there are
> over 900) take a few seconds each to complete,
On 3/18/07, Thom Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I never could find the Pod-to-XHTML'd version of S26 -- the document
attached to that email was S26.pod6, not S26.xhtml.
I don't want to bug Damian, because obviously he has enough of life
"happening", as it were. But is the XHTML'd version of S2
> "AC" == Aaron Crane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AC> That's easy even in Perl 5. This modifies %hash in-place:
AC> my @values =
AC> @[EMAIL PROTECTED] = @values;
you can even do:
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] = delete @[EMAIL PROTECTED];
and i am sure a simple p6 thing can be wri
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Uri Guttman wrote:
> as for rename on hash keys, why not call it rekey? also even if it is
> called rename as a hash method it is different than rename as a function
> to rename a file so there is no ambiguity.
The name "rekey" or some such sounds like a reasonable name, and i
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Aaron Crane wrote:
> David Green writes:
> > In the meantime, Darren's proposal still raises a lot of interesting
> > language questions. For example, how *do* you rename a hash key?
>
> That's easy even in Perl 5. This modifies %hash in-place:
>
> my @values = delete @[E
The main problem people seem to be having with parrotbug is in sending
messages. Since one needs to be online to send messages (if and when
it works) why not let people just use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then
we can reserve the parrotbug program for generating bug reports offline
for later reporting
On Sunday 18 March 2007 10:38, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> The main problem people seem to be having with parrotbug is in sending
> messages. Since one needs to be online to send messages (if and when
> it works) why not let people just use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then
> we can reserve the parrotbug
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:51:32PM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> parrotbug also has the save option, and it saves a lot of
> configuration information. I'm asking if the "send" feature can be
> removed, which is the bit which seems to be broken. We could always
> revisit having a "send" feature f
On 18/03/07, Jerome Quelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
when i wrote parrotbug, i mimicked a lot perlbug.
and iirc, there's an option --send to send the report. and if no option
provided, it will prompt you on what you want to do next...
so, if sending the report fails, maybe parrotbug should defa
Applied in r17628. Thanks!
43 matches
Mail list logo
