On 07/03/18 18:06 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:51:32PM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote: > > parrotbug also has the save option, and it saves a lot of > > configuration information. I'm asking if the "send" feature can be > > removed, which is the bit which seems to be broken. We could always > > revisit having a "send" feature from parrotbug, but it seems somehow > > redundant when we have [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > My feeling on perlbug is that the "send" feature is applied laziness - bug > reports may well be more likely if the extra step to send the e-mail is > eliminated, even if the e-mail address is clearly advertised. > > But this isn't my call here.
when i wrote parrotbug, i mimicked a lot perlbug. and iirc, there's an option --send to send the report. and if no option provided, it will prompt you on what you want to do next... so, if sending the report fails, maybe parrotbug should default to dumping the report instead, and warn the user saying the report has not been send, and is saved in file /foo/bar, charge to her to send it to the correct email address. once again, i don't have time to fix it. feel free to adopt it. jérôme -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
