On Sunday 02 July 2006 01:24, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On 7/1/06, Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One thing I'm wondering about is
> > whether you are going to code all of this into TAP::Harness from scratch.
>
> I believe I mentioned, I intend to steal lots of code from
> Test::Harnes
On 02/07/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 01 July 2006 16:46, Fergal Daly wrote:
> It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
> whole hog with something like
>
> ..1
> OK 1
> ..2
> ...1
> OK 2
> OK 3
> ...2
> OK 4
> ..3
> OK5
No one has provided a
On Jul 1, 2006, at 21:42, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
(1) I don't know all those -libraries are being listed, the test
program certainly doesn't need them... yes, the linker should
know to ignore them as unused... but:
(2) This is not Linux so that -lgmp and -lreadline are not "standard"
chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 01 July 2006 16:46, Fergal Daly wrote:
It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
whole hog with something like
..1
OK 1
..2
...1
OK 2
OK 3
...2
OK 4
..3
OK5
No one has provided an actual use case for it yet. YAGNI.
I've got plenty
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2006, at 21:42, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> (1) I don't know all those -libraries are being listed, the test
>> program certainly doesn't need them... yes, the linker should
>> know to ignore them as unused... but:
>>
>> (2) This is not Linux so that -l
On Jul 2, 2006, at 15:04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
But the -lreadline is needed for something later?
If readline is available, it can be used at interactive prompts, but
it's not absolutely needed.
$ cd languages/perl6/
...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ../../parrot perl6.pbc
p6> say 'ok'
ok
p6>
le
On 1 Jul 2006, at 23:38, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Cons?
* Doesn't handle nested groups - but I have to admit that's a use
case I've never wanted :-)
* Doesn't handle groups with an undefined number of tests. The
obvious solution would be to allow ".." sans numeric suffix so you
would
On 1 Jul 2006, at 20:36, Michael G Schwern wrote:
[snip]
* How can I help?
Provide use cases, what would you want to do with Test::Harness if you
could? What are you doing with Straps? What features do other
testing systems (JUnit, for example) have that you'd like to see in
Perl? Once I pos
This patch implements the register content preserving move operation.
Thanks,VishalPreviously:-Now:1..3ok 1 - in P paramok 2 - tailcall 1not ok 3 - tailcall 2 # TODO use temp# Failed (TODO) test (t/compilers/imcc/imcpasm/optc.t at line 59)
# '# IMCC does produce b
# New Ticket Created by Vishal Soni
# Please include the string: [perl #39683]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39683 >
This transaction appears to have no contentThis patch implements the register content pr
Fergal Daly wrote:
It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
whole hog with something like
..1
OK 1
..2
...1
OK 2
OK 3
...2
OK 4
..3
OK5
I believe the conclusion here was that because demand for nested groups
appeared to be extremely limited, to START with just th
On 02/07/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fergal Daly wrote:
> It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
> whole hog with something like
>
> ..1
> OK 1
> ..2
> ...1
> OK 2
> OK 3
> ...2
> OK 4
> ..3
> OK5
I believe the conclusion here was that because dema
* How can I help?
Provide use cases, what would you want to do with Test::Harness if you
could? What are you doing with Straps? What features do other
testing systems (JUnit, for example) have that you'd like to see in
Perl? Once I post the design, pick it to pieces.
I know I mentioned it to
The most up-to-date Test-Run code is here:
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/web-cpan/Test-Harness-NG/
I don't mind giving Subversion access to the repository to anyone who
registers in http://developer.berlios.de/ and is either a CPAN contributor,
or has sent me one patch for me to commit.
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On 7/1/06, Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please look at Test::TAP::Model and the horrrible hooks it goes
through to make things work.
I'd love to have a SAX like event-handler model for TAP through
TAP::Harness so that I can construct Test::TAP::Model obje
Fergal Daly wrote:
On 02/07/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fergal Daly wrote:
> It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
> whole hog with something like
>
> ..1
> OK 1
> ..2
> ...1
> OK 2
> OK 3
> ...2
> OK 4
> ..3
> OK5
I believe the conclusion here w
On 01/07/06, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The PITA / TestBuilder2 BOF at YAPC whacked up this TAP extension.
Test groups in TAP. There are several use-cases here.
1. I want to name a group of tests rather than the individuals.
2. I don't want to have to count up the total numb
There's no way to declare a top-level plan. That is, I can't say how
many groups of tests I'm going to run so there's effectively no plan,
One point that Andy was extremely insistant on, and I think Schwern and
I agree, is that the main plan is ALWAYS the total number of tests for
the entire t
On 02/07/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's no way to declare a top-level plan. That is, I can't say how
> many groups of tests I'm going to run so there's effectively no plan,
One point that Andy was extremely insistant on, and I think Schwern and
I agree, is that the main pl
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2006, at 15:04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>> But the -lreadline is needed for something later?
>
> If readline is available, it can be used at interactive prompts, but
> it's not absolutely needed.
I think I will first try to get the admins to get compile a n
Fergal Daly wrote:
On 02/07/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's no way to declare a top-level plan. That is, I can't say how
> many groups of tests I'm going to run so there's effectively no plan,
One point that Andy was extremely insistant on, and I think Schwern and
I agree
hi to all docathon hackers (and others too),
one idea we came up with during the docathon is that perl6 needs a
glossary. would the terms autobox or mixin make any sense to a newcomer
who didn't know any OO theory? so this is a proposal to start a glossary
as a new S\d+ or other document. here ar
While you're waiting, we should improve the test for readline: we
used to have similar failures where we found readline (or other
probed thingees) but the version was not recent enough for us to link
with.
Regards.
On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wro
I would like to suggest that we ignore the questions of test counting
right now.
In fact, let's leave Schwern alone until TAP::Harness has the
functionality of Test::Harness. THEN we can argue about the new stuff.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:
I haven't actually read your message, just the Subject, because I was
just going to bed.
Be sure to check out http://pugs.kwiki.org/?Perl6Nomenclature
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
http://convolution.nl/gajigu_juerd_n.html
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #39685]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39685 >
Some parrot droppings...
I get a few warnings of this type during build on OSX 10.4 wit
From: Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:56:32 -0700
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:18:41PM -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
> . . . I even intend to use continations to implement THROW and CATCH; I
> just won't be able to expose them to users via standard Lisp const
在 2006/7/1 下午 6:08 時，Tom Allison 寫到：
I picked this up at the YAPC and made some markups on it.
Apologies that it is not in a diff format, but that's going to come
with practice.
... is there a file attachment somewhere? :-)
I got stuck on some of the intended behaviors and prohibited
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:10:59PM -0500, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Darn, find_global has collided with pdd21.
>
> Currently find_global is prepared to accept a key or a namespace, and
> distinguishing namespaces from arrays is starting to get just a little
> too polymorphic for an opcode.
Agreed.
Will,
Did we get this one in?
-Vishal
On 6/30/06, Vishal Soni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The .end seems to be replaced by an implicit end.
-Vishal
On 6/29/06, Will Coleda via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey, Vishal:
>
> > [vsoni - Tue Jun 27 05:48:27 2006]:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > T
30 matches
Mail list logo
