Re: TAP extension proposal: test groups

[David Golden]

chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 01 July 2006 16:46, Fergal Daly wrote:
It looks like it's only one level of nesting. Any reason not to go the
whole hog with something like

..1
OK 1
..2
...1
OK 2
OK 3
...2
OK 4
..3
OK5

No one has provided an actual use case for it yet.  YAGNI.

I've got plenty of test fixtures where subroutine X with tests calls 
subroutine Y with tests.  Or a loop calls a subroutine with tests.  It 
would be intuitive to group and nest those.

David Golden