On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 03:05:06PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:47:05PM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> : > : But for the :w issue, we can always solve it with the colon:
> : > :
> : > : \d:065 = A digit (cut) followed by "065"
> : >
> : > That doesn't extend t
Doesn't makemaker only like you if you have a single .pm file just in
the root directory?
And otherwise you have to have your lib files actually under lib?
lib/Tree/Splay.pm
lib/Tree/Splay/Node.pm
lib/Tree/Splay/IntRange.pm
t/01_basics.t
t/02_compat.t
Makefile.PL
MANIFEST
-
us
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
Trying to patch punie, I get to a point with the following:
wcoleda$ cat foo.pir
.sub main :main
$P1 = compreg "PAST"
$P2 = $P1("Parrot_AST(Py_Module(Stmts(Py_Print(Const(1)")
$P2()
.end
wcoleda$ ../../parrot foo.pir
src/packfile.c:2314: failed assertion
James E Keenan wrote:
Rob Bloodgood wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
Doesn't makemaker only like you if you have a single .pm file just in
the root directory?
And otherwise you have to have your lib files actually under lib?
lib/Tree/Splay.pm
lib/Tree/Splay/Node.pm
lib/Tree/Splay/IntRange.pm
t/01_
"Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:And we also get \d:0123 as a cheap way of saying \d0123.
I think the ':' changes the meaning of the rule, so you still need
'\d0123' (or preferably something shorter) for the uncut semantic.
Hugo
# New Ticket Created by Nick Glencross
# Please include the string: [perl #37635]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37635 >
This patch closes filehandles which are being leaked by imcc.
Closing filehandles is
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :And we also get \d:0123 as a cheap way of saying \d0123.
>
> I think the ':' changes the meaning of the rule, so you still need
> '\d0123' (or preferably something shorter) for
On 11/8/05, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Adam Kennedy wrote:
> >>> Doesn't makemaker only like you if you have a single .pm file just in
> >>> the root directory?
> >>> And otherwise you have to have your lib files actually under lib?
> The trouble is... I *like* having the file
> [leo - Tue Nov 08 02:17:18 2005]:
>
> Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
>
> > Trying to patch punie, I get to a point with the following:
> >
> > wcoleda$ cat foo.pir
> > .sub main :main
> >$P1 = compreg "PAST"
> >$P2 = $P1("Parrot_AST(Py_Module(Stmts(Py_Print(Const(1)")
> >$P2()
> >
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
[leo - Tue Nov 08 02:17:18 2005]:
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
wcoleda$ cat foo.pir
.sub main :main
$P1 = compreg "PAST"
$P2 = $P1("Parrot_AST(Py_Module(Stmts(Py_Print(Const(1)")
$P2()
.end
The assertion error is gone, but I now get a segfault running this
Nick Glencross (via RT) wrote:
This patch closes filehandles which are being leaked by imcc.
Thanks, applied - r9845.
leo
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to supply default values for instance
variables right in the attribute declaration?
class Jabberwock {
has $.jaws = "bite";
has $.claws = "catch";
}
my $scary = Jabberwock.new;
my $wimpy = Jabberwock.new(jaws => "chew", claws =
Patrick~
On 11/8/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :And we also get \d:0123 as a cheap way of saying \d0123.
> >
> > I think the ':' changes the meaning of t
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
: Patrick~
:
: On 11/8/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > > "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > > :And we also get \d:0123 as a che
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin Rob,
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 02:40, Rob Bloodgood wrote:
> Adam Kennedy wrote:
> > Doesn't makemaker only like you if you have a single .pm file just in
> > the root directory?
> >
> > And otherwise you have to have your lib files actually under lib?
>
Larry~
On 11/8/05, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
> : Patrick~
> :
> : On 11/8/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : > > "Patrick R. Michau
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:55:05AM -0500, Matt Fowles wrote:
> Patrick~
>
> On 11/8/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:57:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > :And we also get \d:0123 as a che
Minor updates to the website.
Added a downloads sidenav, moved all the "how to get the source"
information to a single page, added pointers to the two binary
versions I know about.
Anyone care to suggest some updated text for "Where we are?".
On 11/8/05, Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice to be able to supply default values for instance
> variables right in the attribute declaration?
>
> class Jabberwock {
> has $.jaws = "bite";
> has $.claws = "catch";
> }
>
> my $scary = Jabbe
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:07:42PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > class Jabberwock {
> > has $.jaws = "bite";
> > has $.claws = "catch";
> > }
>
> That is legal Perl 6. The fact that it is not legal pugs is pugs's problem.
> :-)
Noted. Perhaps it'd be worth foregroun
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:44:28PM +0100, TSa wrote:
: HaloO,
:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: > : ::Takes3Ints ::= :(Int,Int,Int --> Any);
: > :
: > : my &foo:(Takes3Ints);
: >
: > I'd say that has to be something like:
: >
: > my &foo:(Takes3Ints:);
: >
: > or maybe one of
: >
: > my
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> Anyone care to suggest some updated text for "Where we are?".
Allison has an excellent document on the state of tool development in
her SVN tree. It would be nice to see it included with Parrot's
documentation.
-J
--
pgphWcJXi4PCB
It probably would have been helpful to have included the URL:
http://svn.lohutok.net/nam/trunk/parrot/docs/compiler_tools.pod
-J
--
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:12:35AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:56:09PM -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> > Anyone care to suggest some u
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:35:38AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: First off: is there a way to declare a method as being private to a role?
We're still batting around the notion of private methods. Certainly
with a lexically scoped sub you can get most of the same benefit.
Trust could then perhaps
On 11/8/05, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Minor updates to the website.
>
here's some content for the 'Talks' section, slides from chip's
austrian perl workshop talk:
http://groups.google.com/group/perl.perl6.internals/browse_frm/thread/f1688a43617f47b7/488f23195bb0f206#488f23195bb0f206
> [coke - Sun Aug 15 13:26:21 2004]:
>
> Purify, Valgrind, and other memory badness detectors
It's still very much welcome to run the whole test suite through valgrind (or
similar tools).
Steps towards this are (afaik):
- %ENV{TEST_PROG} = 'perl vg_tester.pl'
- err recreate this env var - s
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:15 -0500, Austin Frank wrote:
> If roles are interfaces, do we want any class that provides an interface
> consistent with a role to implicitly do the role? That is, if a class
> fulfills all of the interface requirements of a role without actually
> saying it does the
On 11/8/05, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:15 -0500, Austin Frank wrote:
>
> > If roles are interfaces, do we want any class that provides an interface
> > consistent with a role to implicitly do the role? That is, if a class
> > fulfills all of the interface requi
On Nov 8, 2005, at 19:56, Will Coleda wrote:
Anyone care to suggest some updated text for "Where we are?".
I'm currently in Herrnbaumgarten/Austria ;-)
But anyway, the two references to the outdated and presumabely
non-functional P6C should be replaced with more recent info towards PGE
or
- skip non-fatals like unit stack memory spotted by valgrind inside GC
uninitialised
leo
On 11/8/05, Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:07:42PM +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > > class Jabberwock {
> > > has $.jaws = "bite";
> > > has $.claws = "catch";
> > > }
> >
> > That is legal Perl 6. The fact that it is not legal pugs is
Some cleanup in the examples section to avoid some deprecations,
removed all the big PASM examples, pointed at the examples in the
repo. Removed all the PASM calling conventions examples and pointed
people at PIR. Redid the main example page a bit.
Cleaned up the talks page, adding some new
On Nov 8, 2005, at 12:12, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Allison has an excellent document on the state of tool development in
her SVN tree. It would be nice to see it included with Parrot's
documentation.
It's still very rough, but will go into the Parrot repository after I
give it another pass o
33 matches
Mail list logo
