On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:26:04PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 09. Sep 2005, 02:15:03]:
> >
> > I completely missed the fact that Parrot_Docs.t even existed, DOH!
> > Although, it looks like there would be no duplication of testing. The
> > pod.t file I sub
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:38:55AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:26:04PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > I have committed the new test 't/doc/pod.t'.
>
> Great. Were the make targets left out on purpose?
Nevermind. I can see the changes now.
-J
--
p
Joshua Hoblitt schrieb:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:38:55AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:26:04PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
I have committed the new test 't/doc/pod.t'.
Great. Were the make targets left out on purpose?
Nevermind.
Will Coleda wrote:
But it looks like the PMC args are getting *switched* somehow. looking
at the stack trace below starting just before the tailcall:
This bug is fixed now (r9173), the proposed workaround isn't needed anymore.
Thanks for investigating and testing.
leo
Chromatic wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 22:28 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
For search results quite the opposite. I'd really like if if the default
way people got search results back for CPAN modules at least attempted
to order at some level based on citations. (ie number of pre-requisites)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
you are in a maze of Test modules, all looking alike. You are likely being
beaten by a dependecy.
This is a mini-rant on how complex the tesing world for Perl modules has
become. It starts harmless, like you want to install some module. This
time it wa
I might have missed this somewhere in the documentation, but is Perl 6 going
to have any documented notion of things like sequence points, undefined
behaviour, etc? Is it going to mandate that function arguments are evaluated
in any particular order (eg left to right)? Is it going to fix the behavi
I think we should generalize the hyper stuff a little bit more. I
want hyper operators serve as "fmap", or "functor map", rather than
just list. This is a popular concept, and a pretty obvious
generalization.
A functor is any object $x on which you can do "fmap" such that it
satisfies these laws
Hello all.
I have some questions about how Roles will behave in certain
instances, and when/where/what $?ROLE should be bound too.
1) Given this example, where 'bar' is a method stub (no implementation)
role Foo {
method bar { ... }
}
Should the eventually implemented method still have
On 9/11/05, Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> I have some questions about how Roles will behave in certain
> instances, and when/where/what $?ROLE should be bound too.
>
> 1) Given this example, where 'bar' is a method stub (no implementation)
>
> role Foo {
> method
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >Second question is that optionally perl 5 can run with complete global
> >destruction. This is primarily intended for embedded interpreters, where
> >the default implementation (just exit the process to fre
On Sep 10, 2005, at 21:58, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
parrot --leak-test # or the same:
parrot --destroy-at-end
should free all memory allocated (but doesn't yet).
Are these likely to get implemented soon?
It is impl
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:40:54PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> This is a mini-rant on how complex the tesing world for Perl modules has
> become. It starts harmless, like you want to install some module. This
> time it was CPAN-Depency.
>
> Since for security reasons your Perl box is not connect
Hi,
Tels wrote:
Since for security reasons your Perl box is not connected to the net, you
fetch it and all dependencies from CPAN and transfer them via sneaker net
and USB stick. It includes some gems like:
A solution to the sneakernet problem is to have your own CPAN mirror,
either on a mac
One of the problems with dependency checking is dealing with a module
that optionally uses other modules. For instance a module might have
drivers for a bunch of different backends, each of which is optional.
For instance, CGI::Session or Class::DBI::Loader.
Such a relationship, even though not
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 17:40 +0200, Tels wrote:
> I am all for putting often used stuff into extra modules, but I think this
> has gone way to far, especially the user will go through all this just so
> that Random-Module-0.01 can run it's freaky test suite
You can always just not run the te
Ovid writes:
> Guess what the following modules all have in common (aside from the
> fact that I wrote them)?
>
> AI::NeuralNet::Simple
> AI::Prolog
> Games::Maze::FirstPerson
>
> All of them have failed at one time or another because the target
> computer didn't have Sub::Uplevel installe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:27, chromatic wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 17:40 +0200, Tels wrote:
> > I am all for putting often used stuff into extra modules, but I think
> > this has gone way to far, especially the user will go through all
> > this
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 20:21 +0200, Tels wrote:
> On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:27, chromatic wrote:
> > You can always just not run the tests and hope that things work. If
> > the tests don't add any value to you, ignore them.
> They add some value to me (show that at least something works).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Saturday 10 September 2005 21:00, chromatic wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 20:21 +0200, Tels wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:27, chromatic wrote:
> > > You can always just not run the tests and hope that things work.
> > > If the tests don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Saturday 10 September 2005 21:20, Tels wrote:
> Moin,
btw, here is an idea that occured to me:
There is a reason that not every little function in Test::More is it's own
module on CPAN: it makes it much easier to maintain and use them.
So maybe it would be
On 9/10/05, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Moin,
>
> you are in a maze of Test modules, all looking alike. You are likely being
> beaten by a dependecy.
>
> This is a mini-rant on how complex the tesing world for Perl modules has
> become. It starts
They add some value to me (show that at least something works).
>>>
>>>Either they're valuable enough that you install their prerequisites or
>>>they're not.
>
>
> But how am I supposed to find this out? I dont even know whether the
> required modules are used for the tests only, without di
23 matches
Mail list logo
