On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:26:04PM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fr 09. Sep 2005, 02:15:03]:
> >
> > I completely missed the fact that Parrot_Docs.t even existed, DOH!
> > Although, it looks like there would be no duplication of testing.  The
> > pod.t file I submitted searches through the entire parrot tree and test
> > the format of the all Pod containing files.  While Parrot_Docs.t
> > contains regression tests for the Parrot::Docs::* collection of modules.
> 
> I have committed the new test 't/doc/pod.t'.

Great.  Were the make targets left out on purpose?

-J

--

Attachment: pgpmH6Vab5QbD.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to