>From working with the optimizer, I have some questions about the PASM
opcodes, in particular the "inout" opcodes. For example, adding
integer registers is defined by the "add(out INT, in INT, in INT)".
But if one of the input registers is also the output register, it can
be simplified to "add(in
On Jul 20, 2005, at 9:01, Curtis Rawls wrote:
From working with the optimizer, I have some questions about the PASM
opcodes, in particular the "inout" opcodes. For example, adding
integer registers is defined by the "add(out INT, in INT, in INT)".
But if one of the input registers is also t
Bob Rogers wrote:
So that means you do not use the IGP pointer to A when collecting any
generation <= j, correct? Otherwise, I imagine you'd always decide that
A is alive, and hence B and C.
IGPs entries that span the range of to be collected generations are not
considered (and very likely r
Hi all,
For those who don't want to bother compiling these jewels, PXPerl
5.8.7-3 was released, with latest binaries of Pugs 6.2.8 and Parrot
0.2.2 for Windows (sorry for the little delay).
I'm waiting for the next update guys!
Grégoire
--
www.pixigreg.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:37:39PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:49:12PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> > Am I correct in this inference and this judgment? Or is there something
> > about the automated testing that I don't understand?
>
> If I understand correctly
Grégoire Péan wrote:
For those who don't want to bother compiling these jewels, PXPerl
5.8.7-3 was released, with latest binaries of Pugs 6.2.8 and Parrot
0.2.2 for Windows (sorry for the little delay).
I think it's wonderful that you are helping to lower the barrier of entry into
P6 for Windo
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls
# Please include the string: [perl #36597]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36597 >
This patch adds support for "dominance frontiers" in imcc, including:
-Array of Sets fo
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:49:12PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
The inference I drew was that the four false positives I received for
v0.35 came from automated testing in an environment where IO::Capture
was already installed, so that the test script did not need to fi
I was trying using pugs at work and stepped into a problem.
I am reading a file with
my @titles = @*ARGS[1].slurp;
and then just
@titles.say
I am very fond of such a quick way of reading a file instead of every time
dance of "$fh = open...; <$fh>"
a problem is - my file contains characters /[
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 15:16:16 +1200, Sam Vilain wrote:
> Yuval Kogman wrote:
> >everyone gets to choose, and another thing I have in mind is the
> >Transactional role...
> > DBI::Handle does Transactional;
> >To the STM rollbacker and type checker thingy this means that any IO
> >performed b
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 18:23:02 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > * Coercion of parameters and a class's willingness to coerce
> > into something is a better metric of distance
>
> Well, if you think metrics at all are a good way to do dispatch.
Well, we do have a notion of "close
Hi,
# Perl 5
my %hash = (a => 1, b => 2, a => 3);
warn $hash{a}; # 3
But I vaguely remember having seen...:
# Perl 6
my %hash = (a => 1, b => 2, a => 3);
say %hash;# 1
Can somebody confirm this?
--Ingo
--
Linux, the choice of a GNU | Mathematicians practice abs
http://feather.perl6.nl/~japhy/ has R-P-0.20 with the current state of the
Perl6::Rule::Parser code.
--
Jeff "japhy" Pinyan % How can we ever be the sold short or
RPI Acacia Brother #734 % the cheated, we who for every service
http://japhy.perlmonk.org/ % have long ago been overp
Hi,
according to Damian [1]...:
my %hash = (a => 1, b => 2);
my @array = %hash;
say @array[0].isa(Pair); # true
How can I override this behaviour?
class MyHash is Hash {
# Please fill in here
}
my %hash is MyHash = (a => 1, b => 2);
my @array = %h
HaloO Ingo,
you wrote:
according to Damian [1]...:
my %hash = (a => 1, b => 2);
my @array = %hash;
say @array[0].isa(Pair); # true
How can I override this behaviour?
class MyHash is Hash {
# Please fill in here
# my idea is to overload &*infix:<=>
> (I deliberately
> did *not* list IO::Capture as a prerequisite in Makefile.PL because I
> didn't want to force users to install that module. I simply wanted them
> to use it during testing and then throw it away.
this is the start of the right attitude I think - when your testing
environment r
win32--msvc-7.1--perl-5.8.6 reports some unexpected errors. dynclass
and spawnw are expected on windows, the rest are not. if requested, i
can provide more details on the failing tests.
~jerry
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
jerry gay wrote:
win32--msvc-7.1--perl-5.8.6 reports some unexpected errors. dynclass
and spawnw are expected on windows, the rest are not. if requested, i
can provide more details on the failing tests.
Yes please. Especially the imcc and jit tests shouldn't at all be
different to trunk.
~j
Matthew Hodgson wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Larry Wall wrote:
The * looks like a twigil but it isn't really. It's short for "*::",
Is *:: going up to the outermost Perl6 bubble or to the interpreter
that handles it? I mean where do gateways to other languages show
up: parallel to *::Perl6 lik
here's the failure details, with the summary again at the end.
# Failed test (t\op\gc.t at line 258)
# got: 'coro
# done
# '
# expected: 'coro
# coro
# coro
# done
# '
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 19.
# Failed test (t\op\jit.t at line 102)
# got: '109564961210956496084
# '
# expected: '404
#
Below is a patch to remove the first Q&A from:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/faq.html
Against its source form:
http://svn.perl.org/perl.org/docs/live/dev/perl6/faq.pod
I tried to think of a rewrite to replace the two outdated assertions,
but failed miserably.
Thanks,
/Autrijus/
Index: faq
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, "TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)" wrote:
Matthew Hodgson wrote:
I'm very surprised that package variables end up in OUR::, however -
because surely they're not necessarily lexically scoped - and the whole
point of 'our' was lexical global scoping, right? :/
Sorry, what is 'lexical
Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Larry Wall wrote:
> > > Users of the class includes people subclassing the class, so to them
> > > they need to be able to use $.month_0 and $.month, even though there
> > > is no "has $.month_0" declared in the Class implementation, only
> > > "has $.m
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:21:19PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> The image-based platforms would be able to implement a fresh
> from-the-base-install install of each module. This would also greatly
> help to focus attention on modules that many many others rely on as a
> dep that don't install ri
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Also, it eliminates one of the valuable parts of CPAN testers: testing in the
> wild. If you create an artificially clean environment (the clean image),
> then install all the latest versions of dependent modules into it and then
> run the tests you
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-07-19
Welcome to another Perl 6 Summary, brought to you by the words
'displacement' and 'activity'. So far today I've caught up with
everything unread in NetNewsWire, my Flickr groups, every other mailing
list I'm subscribed to and complet
Am I imagining things or was there supposed to be a testing tutorial at OSCON
with Andy Lester, chromatic and the gang? Or am I thinking of YAPC?
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:57 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Am I imagining things or was there supposed to be a testing tutorial at OSCON
> with Andy Lester, chromatic and the gang? Or am I thinking of YAPC?
All session, no tutorial. It's Wednesday afternoon. We're doing
Practical Testing Li
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 06:14:52PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> >I'd like to be able to provide this as a non-singleton PMC class, with the
> >addition of a value lookup, and (possibly) iteration. But cut and paste is
> >evil.
>
> Well, the more general question is:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:33:29AM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> If I have somehow managed to imply I think we should junk the entire
> entire current testing infrastructure and force every tester in the
> world to move over to an image base testing system whether they want to
> or not, then "no
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Am I imagining things or was there supposed to be a testing tutorial at OSCON
> with Andy Lester, chromatic and the gang? Or am I thinking of YAPC?
No, it's not a tutorial. It's 90 minutes of random testing
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:46:43PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Am I imagining things or was there supposed to be a testing tutorial at
> > OSCON
> > with Andy Lester, chromatic and the gang? Or am I thin
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:49:11PM +0100, Nicholas Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Because Andy would be far too polite to push the book he and Richard Foley
> wrote: http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=399
That's because I didn't write it. I'm more a uber-tech-editor and
helped
On Jul 20, 2005, at 2:07 PM, chromatic wrote:
All session, no tutorial. It's Wednesday afternoon. We're doing
Practical Testing Lightning Talks.
I didn't think we were actually *calling* them Lightning Talks, but
that does capture the spirit. Lots of topics, even more examples -- a
very hig
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:52:40PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:49:11PM +0100, Nicholas Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > Because Andy would be far too polite to push the book he and Richard Foley
> > wrote: http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=399
>
>
On Jul 20, 2005, at 21:35, Nicholas Clark wrote:
For now c&p helps :-)
I don't agree. c&p is evil, because it causes code bloat and
propagates bugs.
And I'm not after parameterising the aggregates - I'd like to
instantiate
another instance of what is currently a singleton, for the same ty
On 7/20/05, Konovalov, Vadim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a problem is - my file contains characters /[\x80-\xFF]/, and all that
> characters get replaced with the space.
> Is it possible with "slurp"?
What you want should be something like
"filename".slurp(:raw)
if Perl 6 is going to
Autrijus Tang said:
> ...and I fixed the bug promptly. :)
I'm getting this error:
pugs> 10.round
*** Undeclared variable: "&do_round"
at src/perl6/Prelude.pm line 278, column 9 - line 279, column 5
This is the Prelude code:
sub do_round($n) is primitive is safe {
($n < 0)
Hello All,
I have completed the configure/nmake and test for pugs on Win32 using
Visual Studio .NET
I did run into some issues with setting the PUGS_EMBED= perl5 ( The
compile Would not work) After checking found that GHS is built with gcc
instead of Visual C. I have updated the makefile.pl file
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:08:20AM -0400, Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan wrote:
> http://feather.perl6.nl/~japhy/ has R-P-0.20 with the current state of the
> Perl6::Rule::Parser code.
Awesome, I'll take a look.
-kolibrie
# New Ticket Created by Mitchell N Charity
# Please include the string: [perl #36606]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36606 >
PGE is currently passing all tests, but failing to run a "large" pugs
grammar (o
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:48:43PM -0500, Bill Odom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I didn't think we were actually *calling* them Lightning Talks, but
> that does capture the spirit. Lots of topics, even more examples -- a
> very high-density presentation.
Plus donuts and dancing girls.
--
Andy
If I have somehow managed to imply I think we should junk the entire
entire current testing infrastructure and force every tester in the
world to move over to an image base testing system whether they want to
or not, then "no I didn't mean that".
But I figured that would be obvious...
Adam K
On Jul 20, 2005, at 2:07 PM, chromatic wrote:
All session, no tutorial. It's Wednesday afternoon. We're doing
Practical Testing Lightning Talks.
I didn't think we were actually *calling* them Lightning Talks, but
that does capture the spirit. Lots of topics, even more examples -- a
very hig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:48:43PM -0500, Bill Odom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I didn't think we were actually *calling* them Lightning Talks, but
that does capture the spirit. Lots of topics, even more examples -- a
very high-density presentation.
Plus don
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:28:52AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Donuts ? Did you say donuts !? What kind ?
Nearest Krispy Kreme is in Beaverton on RT 26 or Clackmas just off 205.
Hmmm, chromatic lives in Beaverton...
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~sc
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 18:40 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Hmmm, chromatic lives in Beaverton...
You take that back! I moved to Hillsboro.
(Also, MAX doesn't stop anywhere near Krispy Kreme.)
-- c
Is there a Perl 6 tail call syntax, and if so is it
implemented in Pugs?
&sub.goto(...);
and yes.
Oh...are tail method calls possible?
tail method calls. hrmph.
I have a few methods where I'd like to perform tail calls into another
object's methods. If I were calling one of my own methods, I
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> ... Perhaps you should save your (metaphorical) breath, and I'll
>> wait for a more detailed design.
>
>
> I'm waiting too :-)
Hi,
I believe I found a good workaround for the cycle problems. It is a
little bit slower and worst case (which never occurs, happily) is
|IGP_s
A12 and S12 describe introspection on objects and classes. The
metaclass instance has the method getmethods() which returns "method
descriptors". The design specifies several traits queryable through
these descriptors.
Methods (and subroutines) can take other traits, such as "is lvalue" or
even
I've been slowing banging away at an x86_64 code generator. I'm just trying to
get the basics down for now, generating NOP's; but even that's nontrivial.
While compiling my code additions into Parrot, I've been running into this and
that. This function is redefined a million times, while that on
Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Users of the class includes people subclassing the class, so to them
> > they need to be able to use $.month_0 and $.month, even though there
> > is no "has $.month_0" declared in the Class implementation, only
> > "has $.month".
We thought about defining the attribute va
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been slowing banging away at an x86_64 code generator. I'm just
trying to
get the basics down for now, generating NOP's; but even that's
nontrivial.
While compiling my code additions into Parrot, I've been running into
this and
that.
jerry gay wrote:
This test ...
# Failed test (t\op\jit.t at line 102)
# got: '109564961210956496084
... and others are relying on the initial registers being zeroed.
This is fixed now (r8657).
Thanks for testing,
leo
54 matches
Mail list logo
