On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:37:39PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:49:12PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> > Am I correct in this inference and this judgment? Or is there something > > about the automated testing that I don't understand? > > If I understand correctly, the issue here is you failed to list a > dependency yet the tests failed to catch it because that module was already > installed. Its a false positive, but not testers.cpan.org's fault. It > would have to attempt to automatically figure out what modules your code > needs and check that you list them as dependencies. This is fraut with > peril. When I rule the world (and therefore have requisitioned everyone's tuits) there will be smoke testing that starts from a clean install each time. However, right now I don't have time to try to write this. Sorry. Nicholas Clark
