Re: [perl #34314] [PATCH] clean up test suite

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Bernhard Schmalhofer (via RT) wrote: this is a largish patch that deals with some issues in the test suite. Feedback is very welcome, as there are consequences for future tests. Without having a look at the patch this all sounds very reasonable. I presume it just works, so I'd say: check it in ;)

Release 0.1.2 - the plan (was: Release 0.1.12)

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ note: slightly modifed version number ;) ] > So Dan's string stuff has been rolled into cvs main (along with a huge > # of leo addon patches...) Yeah. The string stuff has again reached the functionality it had earlier, e.g. printing utf8 strings w

Re: installation process of parrot

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Olivier Thauvin wrote: Le Wednesday 2 March 2005 17:04, Leopold Toetsch a écrit : blib/lib/libparrot.so => $(LIBDIR)/libparrot.so whatever/file.pmc => $(PARROTLIBDIR)/whatever/file.pmc Sounds reasonable. What about the icu files? icu use autotools, maybe let autotools decide, but we should find a

cleanup wanted - dynclasses

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
1) dynclasses/py* emits currently some warnings: - pyint.c:1415 warning: declaration of xxx shadows previous local [ 6 total ] - pylist.pmc:35: warning: declaration of 'index' shadows global declaration [ 6 total ] - same in pystring.pmc PS index is a global libc function, the warnings are prod

Re: installation process of parrot

2005-03-03 Thread Olivier Thauvin
Le Thursday 3 March 2005 10:14, Leopold Toetsch a écrit : > Olivier Thauvin wrote: > > Le Wednesday 2 March 2005 17:04, Leopold Toetsch a écrit : > >>>blib/lib/libparrot.so => $(LIBDIR)/libparrot.so > >>>whatever/file.pmc => $(PARROTLIBDIR)/whatever/file.pmc > >> > >>Sounds reasonable. What about t

PPC jit fixes - hopefully

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
I've now committed the proposed changes, see tickets: #32989, #32514, #34072 If you have a PPC based box, please give it a try. Thanks, leo

Re: compile time signature checking

2005-03-03 Thread Abhijit Mahabal
Another edge case: is it legal to have an optional Pair in the signature? That is: sub foo($x, Pair ?$y, +$z){...} If yes, what does this parse as: foo(10, z => 5); If z => 5 is bound to $y, then $y is almost mandatory. ('almost' because we can still say foo(10); ). (and then can we als

[perl #34324] [TODO] Release 0.1.3

2005-03-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #34324] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34324 > Placeholder ticket for Parrot Release 0.1.3

[perl #34325] [TODO] Release 0.2.0

2005-03-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #34325] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34325 > Placeholder ticket for Parrot release 0.2.0

Re: PPC jit fixes - hopefully

2005-03-03 Thread Olivier Thauvin
Le Thursday 3 March 2005 11:56, Leopold Toetsch a écrit : > I've now committed the proposed changes, > see tickets: #32989, #32514, #34072 > > If you have a PPC based box, please give it a try. My ppc box is a Mandrake cooker (devel distro): I ran: Unfortunally, I don't have the C/asm knowledge t

Re: compile time signature checking

2005-03-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:25:30AM -0500, Abhijit Mahabal wrote: : Another edge case: is it legal to have an optional Pair in the : signature? That is: : sub foo($x, Pair ?$y, +$z){...} : : If yes, what does this parse as: : foo(10, z => 5); It ends up equivalent to foo(10, y => (z =

Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Brian Ingerson
Hi all, I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical variable $?OS. There are a lot of other config values that seem like they don't really need their own global. Things like 'privlib' and 'inst

Re: PPC jit fixes - hopefully

2005-03-03 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 17:22 +0100, Olivier Thauvin wrote: > ops/core_ops_switch.c > as -o src/asmfun.o src/asmfun.s > src/asmfun.s: Assembler messages: > src/asmfun.s:6: Error: unsupported relocation against f14 Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it apparently doesn't

Re: PPC jit fixes - hopefully

2005-03-03 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:30 -0800, chromatic wrote: > Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it > apparently doesn't export the symbol properly: Ah, here it is. For whatever reason, it doesn't strip the leading underscore from the symbol name. (GNU as allows symbols to st

Re: Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: : Hi all, : : I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the : build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical : variable $?OS. : : There are a lot of other config values that seem

Re: Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:25:04AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: : Well, hey, we've said that any object can behave as a hash of its : public accessors, so it really don't matter which way they write it. I guess another practical difference is that if you say $*OS you get an undefined value, wher

Re: How can I suspend/control a Test::Builder testing session?

2005-03-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:00:02PM -0500, Tom Moertel wrote: > How I do do this now is somewhat hackish. For the duration of a > property check, I redefine some Test::Builder internals like so: > > sub check_property { > no warnings 'redefine'; > my $property = shift; > my $diags = []

Re: is_deeply hangs

2005-03-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0800, Ovid wrote: > This program hangs when it hits is_deeply. I eventually get an "out of > memory" error. I don't think I saw a followup from you on this. Did you try it with the latest version of Test::More?

Re: Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Brian Ingerson
On 03/03/05 11:25 -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 09:30:03AM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: > : Hi all, > : > : I'm hacking on pugs. I've added a Config.hs which is generated from the > : build system's perl's Config.pm. This allows me to expose the Perl6 magical > : variable $?OS

Re: T::M + T::H recent make module test suites fail

2005-03-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 11:14:18AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > All tests pass for T::M 0.47, but fail on 0.54 Lexical::Attributes does not pass tests for me with either 0.47 nor 0.54 using 5.8.1RC3 (the OS X shipped Perl) nor a clean 5.8.6. Output from the 5.8.6 run attached. With V I see th

Re: Test::Harness 2.47_03

2005-03-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:59:42PM -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > I'm also no longer supporting Perls before 5.005_03. I figure if > someone's using a Perl > 7+ years old, they're not going to care about > new Test::Harness. My logic for supporting old Perls is a little different. If you're stuck i

Re: Test::Harness 2.47_03

2005-03-03 Thread Andy Lester
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:07:44PM -0500, Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > So any particular reason you've dropped 5.4.5 support? Lack of qr//. I might put it back, since it's not that widespread. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Phone numbers and form fields

2005-03-03 Thread Juerd
Michael G Schwern skribis 2005-03-03 16:21 (-0500): > I see this all the time. Phone numbers. Credit card numbers. Postal codes. > I mean, christ. $input =~ s/\D+//g; Phone numbers: don't strip a prefixed +. Postal codes: if it's international, don't strip anything. My postal code is 3316 GG,

Re: Phone numbers and form fields

2005-03-03 Thread Juerd
I hit the wrong macro key, causing the message to be sent to the wrong mailing list. I'm very sorry; please ignore this thread.

Re: Config Variables

2005-03-03 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:36:00PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: : At first I was overwhelmed by your reply, but it's soaking in... :) Er, sorry. Sometimes I get so excited about the Promised Land that I forget we're still standing ankle deep in dying tube worms somewhere out in the middle of the

testing Parallel::Simple

2005-03-03 Thread Ofer Nave
I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production currently). I've also never written any formal tests in perl at all (using the Test::*

Re: Config Variables (TRIVIAL FLUFF POST)

2005-03-03 Thread David Storrs
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 04:09:26PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 12:36:00PM -0800, Brian Ingerson wrote: > > : Thanks for the mind expanding reply. > > You're welcome. Next time don't eat blue sugar cubes from my frig. :-) "I know what you're thinking. 'Why, oh why, didn'

Re: testing Parallel::Simple

2005-03-03 Thread David Golden
Ofer Nave wrote: I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production currently). I've also never written any formal tests in perl at all (u

Re: testing Parallel::Simple

2005-03-03 Thread Ofer Nave
David Golden wrote: Ofer Nave wrote: I've written a new module for CPAN called Parallel::Simple. It's my first CPAN module, and I have not yet uploaded it because I have not yet written any formal tests for it (although I use it in production currently). I've also never written any formal test

Re: [perl #32118] AutoReply: [PATCH] Update of documentation

2005-03-03 Thread Matt Diephouse
What's the status of this patch? It was never applied or commented on. If the tinderbox section is what's holding the patch up, I vote to apply it: that's what CVS is for. -- matt diephouse http://matt.diephouse.com On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:38:43 +0200 (CEST), Stepan Roh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: PPC jit fixes - hopefully

2005-03-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:30 -0800, chromatic wrote: >> Adding -mregnames to the as call makes it compile for me, but it >> apparently doesn't export the symbol properly: > Ah, here it is. For whatever reason, it doesn't strip the leading > underscore from