Joshua Gatcomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it only happens under JIT for the following
> functions (identical code for atan works fine):
> cosh, sinh, tanh, sech, exp, pow
> It only happens if there are two set N# prior to the
> function where # is two different numbers
> N0 = 1
> N1 = 1
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to go back to a frame pointer style of register stack
> access, that's doable, but that's the way it was in the beginning and
> the performance penalties in normal code outweighed the savings in
> stack pushes.
JITted memory access through the
I thought I had already replied to this but I don't
seem to see it in the archive anywhere.
--- Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think next step would need to review Cygwin math
> lib sources and trace
> into the library. Nasty.
Parrot doesn't use GMP right? So the math library in
Okay, since I was asked, and I'm starting to hit a need for it in
general, I want to address morph, and some of its ramifications. And
limitations, as it seems like it's only a partial solution
We had issues way back about this and we worked 'em out, at least to
some extent. Now that I'm diggin
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 15:29, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> The problem with the first scheme is that anything that has a handle
> on the PMC will not get the new layers. Not a good thing.
I like the first scheme. The question that comes up is: when does
something get layered?
That is: if I have code th
> >>How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
I assume you mean "with" a US keyboard? US keyboards don't have ¥.
You can use " zip " if you want ASCII. Otherwise, it depends. But Yen is
Unicode codepoint U+00A5 = 165 decimal, so you can type it in Windows as ALT +
numpad 0165
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 02:26, Mark Lentczner wrote:
> It is clear that there is a missing "list
> concatenate" operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that
> is already taken by "smart match". On the other hand, perhaps comma
> fills this role - though I couldn't find my way through
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 19:04, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Joe Gottman wrote:
> >The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
>
> How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?
Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it. Second, you're not
supposed to. ¥ is a shorthand fo
# New Ticket Created by Jens Rieks
# Please include the string: [perl #29994]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29994 >
% cat error.imc
.sub _main @MAIN
.local string na123me
na123me = "/foo"
lo
Hello,
Mark J. Reed wrote:
> I assume you mean "with" a US keyboard? US keyboards don't have Â.
Oops, must have mistakenly picked an US-International chart, sorry.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello,
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.
Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.
> Second, you're not supposed to.
So why has it been chosen then?
> Â is a shorthand for "zip",
Good to know.
> and if you don't want to use the funky one-char
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley wrote:
>> But under this scheme, the implementing function will have to do a
>> saveall for every function it calls because it doesn't know what
>> registers its caller cares about. And you're almost certainly going
>> to want to call othe
Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:
C-x 8 Y
C-x 8 <
C-x 8 >
Paul
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:27 am, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.
>
> Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.
>
> > Second, you're no
On 2004-06-01 at 14:10:08, Paul Seamons wrote:
> Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:
>
> C-x 8 Y
> C-x 8 <
> C-x 8 >
I suspect there are more than a "few". I don't think there's anything
constitutional about folks who like Emacs that prevents them from liking
Perl or vice-versa. Even t
So is he going to backport his representational ideography to
the operators of perl 5.8?
Darren Duncan wrote:
Mark Lentczner has just (on May 26/28) created a useful/humerous
graphical diagram of the 100+ operators in the Perl 6 language, designed
to look like the periodic table of atomic element
15 matches
Mail list logo
