On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jos Visser wrote:
> Accompanying patch adds the "fortytwo" op to Parrot, so the following
> PASM becomes legal:
>
> fortytwo I0
> print I0
> print "\n"
> end
>
> Example:
>
> $ ../parrot test42.pasm
> 42
>
Why not just use a macro?
# .macro fortyt
I want to be able to have a function with
this kind of signature:
func ($param1, *$otherparams)
AFAIK, there is no way to implement this
with the current calling conventions. You
would have to do something with variable
register IDs, which we don't have and which
would probably be a bad idea, any
> -Original Message-
> From: Luke Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Actually, in Perl 6, they'll do that anyway. Scope in loops is
> strictly defined by the location of the braces WRT the location of
> "my". That is:
>
> while (my $x = somefunc()) { ... }
> # $x still in scope
Lars Balker Rasmussen (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # New Ticket Created by Lars Balker Rasmussen
> # Please include the string: [perl #23029]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=23029 >
>
>
> -Wpadded
Leo~
Why not just use a hash and ditch the array then?
Matt
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The current implementation of find_lex (by_name) is suboptimal. A linear
scan over the list of lexical names is performed
(s. sub.c:lexicals_get_position()).
A better way would be to provide a list of lexicals p
Togos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you assign an integer to a PerlString, it's
> still a PerlString.
No more. I don't know, if its correct. But the behavior now seems more
natural to me:
new P1, .PerlInt
set P1, 42
new P0, .PerlUndef
assign P0, P1 # LHS is PerlInt now
The dest has to
Michal Wallace wrote:
[snip]
> def f():
> return g()
[snip]
> # f from line 3
> .pcc_sub _sub1 non_prototyped
> .local object res1# (visitReturn:528)
> find_lex $P2, 'g' # (callingExpression:325)
> newsub $P3, .Continuation, ret0# (callingExpressi
Lars Balker Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Wpadded seems to be more trouble than it's worth at this stage, so I
Thanks, applied,
leo
At 5:27 AM +0300 8/9/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
> So, the project. Someone needs to go through the configure procedure
and the headers and throw a PARROT_ prefix in front of all the HAS_
defines we define, so we can avoid this problem.
I have a look at the configure procedure and didn't find an
> I've committed a würgaround.
LMAO!
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:51PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
> > > > This is really a languag
> Seems to be related with the multiple freeing reported by Michael.
I thought his name was Michal (:>8
> Is it as simple as checking whether the OS is Windows, and setting
%options
> to contain appropriate paths, e.g.
It's no use while checking if the OS is Windows, 'cause the distribution is
intended
for only Win 32 users. So you should predefine the hash below.
> %options = ( buildprefix => '',
At 12:14 -0400 8/10/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "VL" == Vladimir Lipskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've committed a würgaround.
i get the english side of the pun. what does the german(?) side mean?
The german verb "würgen" means "to strangle", if I'm not mistaken...
Liz
Now Exec works exactly like the jit, I have checked in the missing restart,
fixed some bugs at Parrot_jit_store_retval and make exec_start call runops
instead of calling run_compiled directly, so now all test are successful.
Have fun.
Daniel.
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As calling conventions clearly state, that the caller has to save
> everything, its probably up to imcc/pcc.c to insert above
> statements, if another sub gets called from a sub. I'll fix that in
> a minute ;-)
If and only if that's not a tail call of
hello,
I just picked up a fresh copy with cvs.
Under cygwin, ./Configure.pl fails with the message:
Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm
line 147
So I tried under win32 (MS VS 6.0). Now, Configure.pl is ok, but "nmake" ends with a
fatal error.
I
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> The problem is that when adder() gets returned, it
> needs to remember the enclosing pad. So this needs to
> be
>
> newsub $P1, .Closure, _sub1
>
> which (IIRC) will save the lexical environment in which
> it was created (see closure.pmc), then res
Michal Wallace wrote:
> Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> > Michal Wallace wrote:
[snip]
> > Also... why is $P2 merely an imcc temporary, without a real name?
> > That is, why not do:
> >
> > .pcc_sub _sub1 non_prototyped
> > .local object sub1
> > find_lex sub1, 'g'
> > .pcc_begin non_protot
OK. I'm starting out a prefixing story and here is
CHAPTER I. The HAS_HEADER_ defines.
prefixing.diff
Description: Binary data
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> >Okay, I don't have a good syntax in mind yet,
> >the point is it's a template language and you
> >can subclass/override/extend the template.
> >Maybe there's no syntax and it just uses
> >cleanly coded classes in some oo language.
> >Or perl6 with it's g
> >Under cygwin, ./Configure.pl fails with the message:
> >
> >Determining some sizes...Linker failed (see test.ldo) at
> >lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm line
>
> Try to add this line
>
> link => 'gcc',
>
> to config/init/hints/cygwin.pl
>
> As a result, it must be in the following way:
>
> Conf
Luke said:
>
> sub ($param1, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> In which case, if it's prototyped, we stuff
> everything besides the
> first parameter into a PMC representing
> @otherparams.
>
> And if you meant something else, can't help ya.
>
> Luke
Maybe I misunderstand what 'prototyped' means. I
as
> At 9:21 PM +0300 8/8/03, Vladimir Lipskiy wrote:
> > > So, the project. Someone needs to go through the configure procedure
> >> and the headers and throw a PARROT_ prefix in front of all the HAS_
> >> defines we define, so we can avoid this problem.
> >
> >Some defines have the HAVE_ prefix.
Just got the parrot calling conventions working for Py-Pirate.
I also wrote a guide that explains how the code is laid out
for people who don't know python:
http://pirate.versionhost.com/viewcvs.cgi/pirate/GUIDE?rev=1.1
Sincerely,
Michal J Wallace
Sabren Enterprises, Inc.
---
25 matches
Mail list logo
