On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:51PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > > > > This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+ > > > > implementation. > > > > > > Sadly, this was not considered when hq9+ was developed, > > > so it's not actually part of the language. Maybe someone should > > > develop and extended version - hq9+42 > > > > No, hq9*6, surely? > > Well, that loses the all-important increment op. How about > hq9+(6*9) ?
Maybe just h9q+a...? -- Gordon Henriksen IT Manager ICLUBcentral Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
