Has anybody involved in parrot taken a look at SableVM? It's an
interesting Java VM, done as a doctoral thesis.
http://www.sablevm.org
The thesis covers some interesting optimizations(don't know if any could
apply to parrot).
http://www.info.uqam.ca/%7Eegagnon/gagnon-phd.pdf
-Tupshin
Tupshin Harper wrote:
Has anybody involved in parrot taken a look at SableVM? It's an
interesting Java VM, done as a doctoral thesis.
http://www.sablevm.org
I had it downloaded some time ago, but not much more.
The thesis covers some interesting optimizations(don't know if any could
apply to
At 2:33 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS> is done with a "PARENT" property on the
>>
>> on the what?
DS> The delegated object. D'oh!
DS> So if class A isa B, and B is a perl
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
>>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
>>> formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
>>> anything:
>>
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> so any class X that inherits from B must also modify the PARENT property
>> in B? that sounds like PARENT is a hash of the classes which inherit
>> from B.
DS> Yep. Basically if the inheriting class is of a different type, such tha
At 8:01 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is mor
At 3:05 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> so any class X that inherits from B must also modify the PARENT property
>> in B? that sounds like PARENT is a hash of the classes which inherit
>> from B.
DS> Yep. Basically if the inher
At 7:29 AM +1300 3/8/03, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 06:58, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 2:08 PM +1300 3/7/03, Sam Vilain wrote:
>As long as mechanisms are put in place to allow modules to bypass
> object encapsulation and private/public constraints, and given that
> Parrot will have no XS,
At 7:23 PM + 3/9/03, "Jürgen" "Bömmels" (via RT) wrote:
here is something that sometime needs to be done:
Move the IO from mixed stdio/PIO to pure PIO.
Cool, thanks, and applied.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
This is a day late, but as previously announced, Parrot is now
feature-frozen. I'll cut a release next Saturday, March 15, unless
things look good enough to go before then.
"Feature freeze" means bugfixes and new tests are still ok.
The only currently in-progress feature that I'm aware of is the
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
Objects
===
* Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
* Objects have methods you can call
* Objects have attributes you can fetch
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS> * Objects have methods you can call
DS> * Objects have attributes you can fetch
and store
DS> * You can fetch a hash of all the properties
DS> * When fetching or st
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
> formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
> anything:
[...]
Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa Object? and an
Object hasa Class (assuming tha
At 6:53 PM + 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a
formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than
anything:
[...]
Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa Objec
At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> * Objects have properties you can fetch and store by name
DS> * Objects have methods you can call
DS> * Objects have attributes you can fetch
and store
Well... I'm not sure about that. Cla
# New Ticket Created by Jürgen Bömmels
# Please include the string: [perl #21520]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=21520 >
Hello,
here is something that sometime needs to be done:
Move the IO from mixed stdio
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> At 1:52 PM -0500 3/9/03, Uri Guttman wrote:
DS> is done with a "PARENT" property on the
>>
>> on the what?
DS> The delegated object. D'oh!
DS> So if class A isa B, and B is a perl 5 hash-object-thingie, the object
DS> tha
On Feb-26, Jim Cromie wrote:
> * Henry VIII*, /Walter, Bluff King Hal./ (1491-1547). Six times married
> King of England (1509-47). First marrying Catherine of Aragon the widow
After releasing the Nazgul into the world last time, I may as well let
out a crazed misogynist next... :-)
[Arg. My outgoing mail was messed up last week when I sent out a whole
bunch of emails just before leaving for Hawaii, so this message was
very delayed.]
On Feb-24, K Stol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As Lua is a typeless language, variables can take values of any
> type. This has to be checked during ru
On Feb-25, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Steve Fink wrote:
>
> >On Feb-23, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >
> >I think I kind of have a grasp on what's going on, now. So I've
> >attached two possible patches.
>
>
> I'm currently on the imcc stuff and could have a more detailed look at
> both patches afte
I re-organized the languages\BASIC tree into "compiled" and "interpreted"
sub-trees. The interpreted tree contains the original pasm-only
implementation of GW-BASIC as an interpreted language. The compiled tree
contains a Quick-BASIC like compiler and a few sample BASIC programs
(connect-4, e
21 matches
Mail list logo
