Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 6:53 PM +0000 3/9/03, Piers Cawley wrote: >>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a >>> formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than >>> anything: >> >>[...] >> >>Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa Object? and an >>Object hasa Class (assuming that the object is, um, Classy)? > > Pretty much, yeah. I'm not sure if Classes will be objects as such, > rather than just another Special PMC Thing (like scalars, hashes, > arrays) but they'll be pretty darned close to objects if they aren't.
For various, nefarious reasons I'd like to be able to manipulate classes as objects at a language level, even if they aren't objects down at the Parrot level, but I'll wait for Apo 12 for that one. -- Piers
