Bart Lateur wrote:
> But isn't there going to be a large overhead, in populating such a
> "hash"?
If you need an ordered data structure the overhead would be lower
than using a hash.
> Doesn't the tree have to be reorganized every time you add a
> single new entry?
No. Sometimes you may have to
Here's a (slightly) cleaned up copy of what has been transcribed so
far, with at least the titles of the slides stitched in.
Larry
As I look around here, I see a lot of young faces. Almost too young.
I like youth. I always planned to stay young all my life. I've always
been blessed with a fac
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> Rename the local operator? Yeah, I think we ought to do that. It
> confuses people when we call it local(). The problem is, of course,
> that this is not a perfect solution--they haven't come up with the
> right name here: savetmp, t
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 06:47:59PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> > Rename the local operator? Yeah, I think we ought to do that. It
> > confuses people when we call it local(). The problem is, of course,
> > that this is not a perfect
Simon Cozens writes:
: You're learning Japanese, right? It's gotta be "toriaezu".[1] :)
Yes, but if we go down that route, we're gonna end up with all the
verbs at the end. Instead of "print @foo", we get something like:
@foo wa kaite kudasai;
Larry
Jarkko Hietaniemi writes:
: On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 06:47:59PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: > > Rename the local operator? Yeah, I think we ought to do that. It
: > > confuses people when we call it local(). The problem is, of cour
Isn't C# (C Sharp) a Microsoft-owned language that is (currently) available
only on Win2k (though apparently targeted for crossplatform)? After Larry said
he was thinking of making parts of Perl 6 in C#, I went on a studying rampage.
I find nothing for anything except Win2k. Can someone provide
On Wednesday, October 18, 2000 12:59 PM, Larry Wall [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> Simon Cozens writes:
> : You're learning Japanese, right? It's gotta be "toriaezu".[1] :)
>
> Yes, but if we go down that route, we're gonna end up with all the
> verbs at the end. Instead of "print @foo", we g
At 10:30 PM 10/18/00 -0500, David Grove wrote:
>Isn't C# (C Sharp) a Microsoft-owned language that is (currently) available
>only on Win2k (though apparently targeted for crossplatform)? After Larry
>said
>he was thinking of making parts of Perl 6 in C#,
Perl's not going to be written in C#. Wha
David L. Nicol writes:
> > interim()?
>
> In discussing how to rename "local"
> we appear to be trading in the spatial metaphor for the temporal.
> How about
> fornow
I'd rather not revisit this, or any other, RFC until Larry's had a
chance to *really* comment and put forward his suggesti
Ah, sorry, misunderstood. I do remember him saying it will probably be done in
C with perl as the parser, with C++ dubious.
I just got caught up in the C# research.
On Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:10 AM, Dan Sugalski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> At 10:30 PM 10/18/00 -0500, David Grove
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
>> Rename the local operator? Yeah, I think we ought to do that. It
>> confuses people when we call it local(). The problem is, of course,
>> that this is not a perfect solution--they haven't come up with the
>> right name here: save
At 01:07 AM 10/19/00 -0500, J. David Blackstone wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> >> Rename the local operator? Yeah, I think we ought to do that. It
> >> confuses people when we call it local(). The problem is, of course,
> >> that this is not a perfect s
13 matches
Mail list logo
