David L. Nicol writes: > > interim()? > > In discussing how to rename "local" > we appear to be trading in the spatial metaphor for the temporal. > How about > fornow I'd rather not revisit this, or any other, RFC until Larry's had a chance to *really* comment and put forward his suggestions. Otherwise we're just going to get caught in a cycle of pointless revisitation, which Larry will either read (taking time away from reading the real RFCs) or ignore (in which case it's been pointless). Thanks, Nat
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Larry Wall
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Simon Cozens
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Larry Wall
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Piers Cawley
- renaming local to "hold" Nathan Torkington
- renaming local to "hold" David L. Nicol
- Re: renaming local to "fornow" (o... David L. Nicol
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Larry Wall
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Philip Newton
- Re: Transcription of Larry's talk Steve Fink
- compile-time taint checking and the halting pro... David L. Nicol
- Re: (COPY) compile-time taint checking and... Steve Fink
- Re: (COPY) compile-time taint checking... David L. Nicol
- Re: compile-time taint checking an... Steve Fink
- Semantic analysis [Was: compile-ti... Ken Fox