Re: spurious assembleur directives get in the way of oneliner return implementation

2004-10-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > .return -1, name > Sadly, the .return directive and other are overloaded to express > user stack operations. >| PARAM reg{ $$ = MK_I(interp, cur_unit, "restore", 1, > $2); } >| RESULT var {

Re: spurious assembleur directives get in the way of oneliner return implementation

2004-10-14 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:43 PM -0400 10/14/04, Matt Diephouse wrote: On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:23:06 +0200, Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Juste like I added the possibility of declaring many registers variables with one .sym directive, I am working on returning or yielding in one line so one can wri

Re: spurious assembleur directives get in the way of oneliner return implementation

2004-10-14 Thread Matt Diephouse
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:23:06 +0200, Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Juste like I added the possibility of declaring many registers > variables with one .sym directive, I am working on returning or > yielding in one line so one can write: > > .return -1, name > > instead

spurious assembleur directives get in the way of oneliner return implementation

2004-10-14 Thread Stéphane Payrard
Hi, Juste like I added the possibility of declaring many registers variables with one .sym directive, I am working on returning or yielding in one line so one can write: .return -1, name instead of: .pcc_begin_return .return -1 .return name .pcc_end_return Sadly, the .ret