Re: spurious assembleur directives get in the way of oneliner return implementation

[Dan Sugalski]

At 4:43 PM -0400 10/14/04, Matt Diephouse wrote:
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:23:06 +0200, Stéphane Payrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 Hi,
 Juste like I added the possibility of declaring many registers
 variables with one .sym directive, I am working on returning or
 yielding in one line so one can write:
     .return -1, name
 instead of:
     .pcc_begin_return
     .return -1
     .return name
     .pcc_end_return
<snip>
 Comments?
Yes, please! .pcc_begin_return/.pcc_end_return is so ugly. (And yes, I
realize this is PIR and not Perl.)
I'd be OK with this as well, though I think I'd make the token:
   .return( .... )
so it could be relatively easily distinguished 
from plain .return statements by the parser.
--
				Dan

--------------------------------------it's like this-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk