Re: [perl #61038] parrot 0.8.0 compilation failure in Tru64 5.1B

2008-12-23 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
chromatic via RT wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >> I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on >> those. An easy quick one to fix would be this: >> >> cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in >> enume

Re: [perl #61038] parrot 0.8.0 compilation failure in Tru64 5.1B

2008-12-23 Thread chromatic
On Tuesday 23 December 2008 14:53:15 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on > those. An easy quick one to fix would be this: > > cc: Info: ./include/parrot/sub.h, line 47: Trailing comma found in > enumerator list. (trailcomma) > } sub_

Re: [perl #61038] parrot 0.8.0 compilation failure in Tru64 5.1B

2008-12-23 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
.pl and/or during compilation. > > Thanks for the report. Thanks for looking into it. I synced to r34297 and it seems to compile in Tru64, thanks! I am seeing some new warnings, if I find the time I'll file a new bug on those. An easy quick one to fix would be this: cc: Info: ./inclu

Re: [perl #61038] parrot 0.8.0 compilation failure in Tru64 5.1B

2008-12-23 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:00:32 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > First we get a couple of warnings fro some files, but then one file > refuses to compile (see below). I didn't notice any other warnings or > failures during Configure.pl and/or during compilation. Thanks for the report. > src/op

[perl #61038] parrot 0.8.0 compilation failure in Tru64 5.1B

2008-12-04 Thread via RT
; uname -a OSF1 kosh.hut.fi V5.1 2650 alpha kosh:/tmp/jhi/parrot/parrot-0.8.0 ; cc -V Compaq C V6.5-011 on Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1B (Rev. 2650) Compiler Driver V6.5-003 (sys) cc Driver kosh:/tmp/jhi/parrot/parrot-0.8.0 ; .. src/ops/core_ops.c cc: Warning: src/ops/object.ops, line 436: Non-void

[perl #37361] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 Tru64 core dump t/examples/japh.t #10

2008-03-25 Thread Will Coleda via RT
s ticket. If we could get a test run on Tru64 again, that'd be great. ^_^

[perl #49590] [PATCH] tru64 hints tweaks (for Parrot 0.5.1)

2008-01-12 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Thanks, applied as r24799

[perl #49590] [PATCH] tru64 hints tweaks (for Parrot 0.5.1)

2008-01-10 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #49590] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49590 > Attached. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There

Re: [PATCH] tru64: hints tweaks

2008-01-09 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > --- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200 > +++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm 2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200 > @@ -43,8 +45,9 @@ > $conf->data->set( linkflags => $linkflags ); > } > > -# Re

Re: [PATCH] tru64: hints tweaks

2008-01-09 Thread James E Keenan
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: --- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200 +++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200 @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ Jarkko: Our RT system doesn't pick up new submissions that go (only) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coul

[PATCH] tru64: hints tweaks

2008-01-09 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
--- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200 +++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200 @@ -14,8 +14,10 @@ if ( $ccflags !~ /-pthread/ ) { $ccflags .= ' -pthread'; } +if ( $ccflags !~ /-D_REENTRANT/ ) { +

Re: [PATCH] atan2(0, 0) is not portable (caused nanqs in tru64)

2008-01-05 Thread Joshua Isom
What does atan2(0, 0) generate on tru64? On Jan 5, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: --- src/pmc/complex.pmc.dist2008-01-06 00:48:21.0 +0200 +++ src/pmc/complex.pmc 2008-01-06 02:53:34.0 +0200 @@ -1180,7 +1180,10 @@ im = 0.0; RE(d) = log(sqrt

Re: [PATCH] atan2(0, 0) is not portable (caused nanqs in tru64)

2008-01-05 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 05 January 2008 17:51:41 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > --- src/pmc/complex.pmc.dist 2008-01-06 00:48:21.0 +0200 > +++ src/pmc/complex.pmc 2008-01-06 02:53:34.0 +0200 Thanks, applied as r24578. I'm really glad to hear the implication that Tru64 can

[PATCH] atan2(0, 0) is not portable (caused nanqs in tru64)

2008-01-05 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
--- src/pmc/complex.pmc.dist2008-01-06 00:48:21.0 +0200 +++ src/pmc/complex.pmc 2008-01-06 02:53:34.0 +0200 @@ -1180,7 +1180,10 @@ im = 0.0; RE(d) = log(sqrt(re*re + im*im)); -IM(d) = atan2(im, re); + if (re == 0.0 && im == 0.0) /* atan2(0,

[perl #41250] [tru64] failures in p5regex/p5rx

2007-01-13 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
I think these errors were because p5rx.t was in the midst of being converted from Perl 5 to PIR (and was left with a number of failing tests). I was getting similar (identical?) failures for p5rx.t on my x86_64 platform. I think that r16593 fixes p5rx.t -- if you could test it on tru64 to

[perl #41250] [tru64] failures in p5regex/p5rx

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41250] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41250 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41256] [tru64] NaNQ failures in t/pmc/complex

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41256] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41256 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41251] [tru64] core dump from t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_20.pasm

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41251] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41251 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41253] [tru64] core dump from t/dynoplibs/myops_3.pir

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41253] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41253 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41255] [tru64] core dump from t/pmc/pmc_5.pasm

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41255] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41255 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41249] [tru64] core dump in t/pmc/interp_3.pir

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41249] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41249 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41247] [tru64] failure in tge/parser

2007-01-12 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
Fixed in r16570, thanks! Pm

[perl #41248] [tru64] failure in pge_util

2007-01-12 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
Now fixed in r16570, thanks! Pm

[perl #41254] [tru64] core dump from library/pg

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41254] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41254 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41257] [tru64] core dump in t/pmc/io_1.pir

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41257] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41257 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41248] [tru64] failure in pge_util

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41248] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41248 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41247] [tru64] failure in tge/parser

2007-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41247] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41247 > --- osname= dec_osf osvers= 5.1a arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi cc= cc V6.4

[perl #41110] [PATCH] tru64: compile (src/nci.c) and runtime (src/memory.c)

2006-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
On Mon Dec 18 18:25:24 2006, jhi wrote: > Two patches, the first is needed for parrot trunk to compile at all > in Tru64, the second one is needed to dodge dozens of core dumps. > There still are some, will take a closer look when I have more time, > but least this way there is less wa

[perl #41110] [PATCH] tru64: compile (src/nci.c) and runtime (src/memory.c)

2006-12-19 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #41110] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41110 > Original Message Subject: [PATCH] tru64: compile (src/nc

Re: [PATCH] tru64: compile (src/nci.c) and runtime (src/memory.c)

2006-12-04 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> The second one: in tru64 malloc/calloc/realloc of zero bytes returns > a NULL ptr (quite logical, in a way: you couldn't put anything in a > memory block of zero bytes...). I guess one could be fancier and > add a probe for this feature in Configure.pl, but I was feeli

[PATCH] tru64: compile (src/nci.c) and runtime (src/memory.c)

2006-12-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Two patches, the first is needed for parrot trunk to compile at all in Tru64, the second one is needed to dodge dozens of core dumps. There still are some, will take a closer look when I have more time, but least this way there is less wading in core dumps. In more detail: The first one is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_12.pasm

2006-08-06 Thread xinhua liu
un-subscribe On 8/4/06, Chip Salzenberg via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fixed in svn by deleting that never-will-work-again japh, which hacked internals in an amazingly evil way.

Re: [perl #39751] unbug - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/dynoplibs/myops_4.pir

2006-08-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Chip Salzenberg via RT wrote: > parrot obeys you > when you ask it politely > to halt and catch fire The test harness should kindly be told about this confusing anomaly I never could get my haikus to work -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special bio

[perl #39750] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_12.pasm

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg via RT
Fixed in svn by deleting that never-will-work-again japh, which hacked internals in an amazingly evil way.

[perl #39751] unbug - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/dynoplibs/myops_4.pir

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg via RT
parrot obeys you when you ask it politely to halt and catch fire

[perl #39752] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/op/lexicals_27.pir

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg via RT
Fixed in svn. Actual bug was causing malloc(0). Proximate bug is that, on tru64, malloc(0) fails. :-)

[perl #39753] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/pmc/io_1.pir

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg via RT
Until we know what these I/O ops should do, seg faults aren't unexpected. Nor are they something we can meaningfully fix. This ticket now depends on the review of the I/O pdd.

[perl #39754] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_20.pasm

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg via RT
This ticket now depends on ResizeableBooleanArray rewrite.

Re: [perl #39756] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_10.pasm

2006-08-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 23:29 schrieb Chip Salzenberg: > Wow. So I've just learned that our test harness ignores seg faults. Nope. It's Test::* TODO magic. From t/examples/japh.t: # known reasons for failure my %todo = ( 1 => 'opcode "pack" is gone', 2 => 'opcode "pack" is

Re: [perl #39756] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_10.pasm

2006-08-03 Thread Chip Salzenberg
Wow. So I've just learned that our test harness ignores seg faults. Which explains why t/examples/japh.t keeps reporting "all tests successful" when actually they're mostly segfaulting and otherwise failing. This particular japh uses threading, which is known not to work until the STM work by Ch

Re: [perl #39755] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 6 failures: getting NaNQs: t/pmc/complex.t

2006-07-07 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Jerry Gay via RT wrote: > i've related this ticket to #38887: (Nobody) Result of INFINITY or NAN > stringification is platform dependent [new] > > there are many platforms failing NaN/Inf related tests due to this issue. That is very true, and very worthy of a separate ticket, but isn't the failu

Re: [perl #39751] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/dynoplibs/myops_4.pir

2006-07-07 Thread Will Coleda
hcf is actually supposed to explode if possible. Not sure if we should: 1) skip the test usually; 2) close the ticket as "not a bug" 3) eliminate this particular (silly) dynamic opcode. Regards. On Jul 7, 2006, at 2:04 AM, Jarkko Hietaniemi (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hiet

[perl #39752] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/op/lexicals_27.pir

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39752] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39752 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/pmc/lexicals_27.pir # Failed test (t/op/lexicals.t at l

[perl #39751] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/dynoplibs/myops_4.pir

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39751] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39751 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/dynoplibs/myops_4.pir neither here thread 0x3 signal Segment

[perl #39755] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 6 failures: getting NaNQs: t/pmc/complex.t

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39755] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39755 > t/pmc/complexok 32/53 # Failed test (t/pmc/complex.t at

[perl #39756] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_10.pasm

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39756] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39756 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/examples/japh_10.pasm run --gc-debug t/examples/japh_10.pasm

[perl #39750] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/examples/japh_12.pasm

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39750] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39750 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/examples/japh_12.pasm Parrot VM: PANIC: Out of bound registe

[perl #39753] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/pmc/io_1.pir

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39753] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39753 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/pmc/io_1.pir Undef ok 1 Undef ok 2 Assertion failed: (unsign

[perl #39754] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tru64 core dump: t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_20.pasm

2006-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #39754] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=39754 > (dbx) run --gc-debug t/pmc/resizablebooleanarray_20.pasm thread 0x3 signal Segmenta

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Will Coleda wrote: > While you're waiting, we should improve the test for readline: we > used to have similar failures where we found readline (or other > probed thingees) but the version was not recent enough for us to link > with. (1) Some sort of grouping for the libraries so that only th

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-02 Thread Will Coleda
While you're waiting, we should improve the test for readline: we used to have similar failures where we found readline (or other probed thingees) but the version was not recent enough for us to link with. Regards. On Jul 2, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Leopold Toetsch wro

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-02 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Jul 2, 2006, at 15:04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >> But the -lreadline is needed for something later? > > If readline is available, it can be used at interactive prompts, but > it's not absolutely needed. I think I will first try to get the admins to get compile a n

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Jul 2, 2006, at 15:04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: But the -lreadline is needed for something later? If readline is available, it can be used at interactive prompts, but it's not absolutely needed. $ cd languages/perl6/ ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ../../parrot perl6.pbc p6> say 'ok' ok p6> le

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-02 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Jul 1, 2006, at 21:42, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > >> (1) I don't know all those -libraries are being listed, the test >> program certainly doesn't need them... yes, the linker should >> know to ignore them as unused... but: >> >> (2) This is not Linux so that -l

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Jul 1, 2006, at 21:42, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: (1) I don't know all those -libraries are being listed, the test program certainly doesn't need them... yes, the linker should know to ignore them as unused... but: (2) This is not Linux so that -lgmp and -lreadline are not "standard"

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-07-01 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
rintf died during execution: Can't run the snprintf testing program: at config/auto/snprintf.pm line 33. "cxx" is the Tru64 C++ compiler. (1) I don't know all those -libraries are being listed, the test program certainly doesn't need them... yes, the linker should

Re: [BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-06-30 Thread Leopold Toetsch
On Jun 29, 2006, at 18:48, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Any way to add verbosity to e.g. see which commands are being run? perl Configure.pl --verbose-step=snprintf leo

[BUG] parrot 0.4.5: Configure.pl: tru64

2006-06-30 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Parrot 0.4.5 in Tru64 5.1B: $ perl Configure.pl ... Determining if your platform supports readline.yes. Determining if your platform supports gdbm..no. Testing snprintf...resolve_symbols: loader error: dlopen: libreadline.so.4: symbol "tg

[perl #37361] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 Tru64 core dump t/examples/japh.t #10

2006-05-15 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Jarkko - Is this still an issue with svn-latest ? > [jhi - Wed Oct 05 22:27:25 2005]: > > Didn't notice this earlier because the whole japh.t is > reported as succeeding even though a core dump happens > for the subtest #10. > >1 pthread_kill(0x0, 0x11fffb038, 0x0, 0x11fffc010, 0x3ff000

Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-10-10 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: >>[doughera - Thu Oct 06 07:21:15 2005]: >> >>I think this bug can be closed. I just got those tests to pass on >>Sparc/Solaris 8 with gcc -m64 -mcpu=v9. (Mind you lots of other tests >>fail, but that's a separate problem.) >> >> >> > > > Jarrko, > > Are you OK w

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:32:40PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > > Since I don't think anyone else can test this on tru64, would you mind > > consolidating all of the fixes discussed in this thread into a single > > patch? > > Attached

Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-10-06 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Jarkko Hietaniemi via RT wrote: > > > Jarkko, > > > > > > I never got a response from anyone. How would you feel about closing > > > this bug? > > > > I don't think it can be closed until at least another big-

Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-10-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Jarkko Hietaniemi via RT wrote: > -J > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > Jarkko, > > > > I never got a response from anyone. How would you feel about closing > > this bug? > > I don't think it can be closed until at least another big-endi

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-06 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
igure::Data->set( > > ccflags => $ccflags, > > ); > > So the above patch should be applied so that Tru64 is happy, and works, > but as was pointed out to me in private email, the (socklen_t*) cast > should most probably be removed, too (and the newsize made s

Re: [PATCH] Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-06 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
( $ccflags !~ /-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=/ ) { > +# Request all POSIX visible (not automatic for cxx, as with cc) > +$ccflags .= ' -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500'; > +} > Configure::Data->set( > ccflags => $ccflags, > ); So the above patch should be applied so that Tru64 is hap

[PATCH] Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-06 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
&newsize)) == -1) >>>{ >>>fprintf(stderr, "accept: errno=%d", errno); >>>/* Didn't get far enough, free the io */ >>> >> >> >>Please ignore that patch, it doesn't work since socklen_t is a long, &

Re: [perl #37339] AutoReply: [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/pmc/perlstring.t #44

2005-10-06 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
The latest changes by Leo seem to have fixed this one, and similarly #37338 and #37337.

Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-10-06 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
-J >>> >> > > Jarkko, > > I never got a response from anyone. How would you feel about closing > this bug? I don't think it can be closed until at least another big-endian 64-bit platform (like IRIX 64 is/was) has been used to verify that things work. > -J > > >

[perl #37361] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 Tru64 core dump t/examples/japh.t #10

2005-10-05 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37361] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37361 > Didn't notice this earlier because the whole japh.t is reported as succeeding even

Re: [perl #37338] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/pmc/string.t #13

2005-10-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi (via RT) wrote: t/pmc/stringok 12/35 # Failed test (t/pmc/string.t at line 556) # got: '0 # 1 # -1 # 128 It looks like #37338 and #37339 reveal the same, now fixed, bug as #37337. leo

Re: [perl #37337] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/op/comp.t #7

2005-10-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37337] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37337 > t/op/compok 6/80 # Failed test (t/op/

Re: [perl #37335] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 compiler serious warning

2005-10-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi (via RT) wrote: cc: Info: imcc/pcc.c, line 379: In this statement, an array is being accessed o\ utside the bounds specified for the array type. (subscrbounds)^ regs[2] = arg;^ - nice compiler And sure enough, regs has been declared as two-elemen

Re: [perl #37334] [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-04 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37334] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37334 > io/io_unix.c does not compile because socklen_

Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
o=%d", errno); >> /* Didn't get far enough, free the io */ >> > > > Please ignore that patch, it doesn't work since socklen_t is a long, > not an int, and in Tru64 one shall not mix those. Please ignore the ignore :-) It seems that "it depends&q

Re: [perl #30671] tru64 problems with nci.t and object-meths.t

2005-10-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
>> >> > > > Jarkko, > > Does this issue still occur on tru64? Works in Parrot 0.3.0. > -J > >

Re: [perl #37334] AutoReply: [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
io */ > Please ignore that patch, it doesn't work since socklen_t is a long, not an int, and in Tru64 one shall not mix those. >

Re: [perl #30997] pdb labels broken in tru64/alpha

2005-10-03 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
>> 1989 /* >>(dbx) >> >>The line->label is an impossible pointer, so deferencing causes promptly >>a bus error. >> >> >> > > > Jarkko, > > Can you restest and confirm that this is still an issue with pdb? These seems to have been fixed. > Thanks, > > -J > >

[perl #37339] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/pmc/perlstring.t #44

2005-10-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37339] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37339 > t/pmc/perlstringok 43/68 # Failed test (t/pmc/perlstring.t at line 1244)

[perl #37338] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/pmc/string.t #13

2005-10-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37338] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37338 > t/pmc/stringok 12/35 # Failed test (t/pmc/string.t at line 556) #

[perl #37337] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 t/op/comp.t #7

2005-10-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37337] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37337 > t/op/compok 6/80 # Failed test (t/op/comp.t at line 156) # got:

[perl #37335] [BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 tru64 compiler serious warning

2005-10-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37335] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37335 > imcc/pcc.c^M cc: Info: imcc/pcc.c, line 379: In this statement, an array is being

[perl #37334] [PATCH] Parrot 0.3.0 does not compile in Tru64 because of missing socklen_t

2005-10-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #37334] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37334 > io/io_unix.c does not compile because socklen_t is not defined. According to the

Call for IRIX testers - was Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-09-25 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
Does anyone has access to an IRIX machine? -J -- On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:37:44PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > > > > Jarkko, > > > > Are there still outstanding issues on IRIX? AFAIK nobody else has been > > building parrot on that platform. > > Unfortunately I no more have access t

Re: [perl #27003] bytecode (header?) problem in tru64/alpha

2005-09-23 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> > Jarkko, > > Are there still outstanding issues on IRIX? AFAIK nobody else has been > building parrot on that platform. Unfortunately I no more have access to that platform. > -J > > > >

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Forgot to add: in many environments (at least SGI/MIPS, AIX Power/PPC, HP-UX/HPPA) things are even more interesting -- one can in compile time decide between different 32-bit modes and different 64-bit modes. (E.g. in IRIX there are two of each.) I believe the new x86-ish processors and Linux/gcc

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. (I wish I still had Cray 90 access, the unusual-but-legal > longsize=ptrsize=intsize=shortsize=8 nicely shook bugs to the bright > light of day in Perl 5.) Would break nicely ;) leo

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Nick Glencross
is 64 bit. Weelll... I did not say *quite* that. What I said that so far the Parrot's core seems to have worked well in systems with _some_ 64-bit integer types available. So the Parrot core has been 64-bit _safe_, which doesn't mean it has been _using_ 64-bit integers explicit

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Nick Glencross wrote: > Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > >>>Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6 >>> > Ok, so intsize=4, which is why my md5 test tried to run. I'd be really > grateful if some could run my inst

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Nick Glencross
Jay, Jay Scherrer wrote: > Attached is my make test output from my laptop running Fedora Core 3 > x86_64bit: makeTest.txt > Is there any other way I can help? > Thanks for that Jay. What's happened is that in the last week a new test has gone into CVS, but I haven't had access to systems besides a

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Nick Glencross
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6 True, not true :-) I do manual test compiles in Tru64 once in a while. Once the packfile portability problems were solved back when, the Parrot core at least has been pretty good rega

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-02 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> > Not true. We've done successful compiles before on Tru64. Maybe as of 0.0.6 True, not true :-) I do manual test compiles in Tru64 once in a while. Once the packfile portability problems were solved back when, the Parrot core at least has been pretty good regarding 64-bitness.

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-01 Thread Jay Scherrer
Attached is my make test output from my laptop running Fedora Core 3 x86_64bit: makeTest.txt Is there any other way I can help? Jay Scherrer On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 11:24 -0500, MrJoltCola wrote: > At 06:33 AM 4/1/2005, Nick Glencross wrote: > > >Having never had access to a Tru64

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-01 Thread Nick Glencross
MrJoltCola wrote: At 06:33 AM 4/1/2005, Nick Glencross wrote: Having never had access to a Tru64 system, does that mean that parrot is compiled 64 bit? Two initial comments: * This is a platform that we've not had a chance to test on, so I'm grateful to see it tested on a new platfo

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-01 Thread MrJoltCola
At 06:33 AM 4/1/2005, Nick Glencross wrote: Having never had access to a Tru64 system, does that mean that parrot is compiled 64 bit? Two initial comments: * This is a platform that we've not had a chance to test on, so I'm grateful to see it tested on a new platform. It was hop

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-01 Thread Nick Glencross
Nick Glencross wrote: Having never had access to a Tru64 system, does that mean that parrot is compiled 64 bit? Two initial comments: * This is a platform that we've not had a chance to test on, so I'm grateful to see it tested on a new platform. It was hoped that it would work, b

Re: [Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-04-01 Thread Nick Glencross
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Original Message Subject: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:41:30 +0300 From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Warning: pylist.pmc, line 601: In this st

[Fwd: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64]

2005-03-31 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Original Message Subject: a warning and a failure for parrot in Tru64 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:41:30 +0300 From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Warning: pylist.pmc, line 601: In this statement, the referenced

Re: [perl #34352] [PATCH] Tru64: strip the strip

2005-03-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The ld -s flag caused all symbol information to be stripped from > the libraries, which caused all the Python dynclass tests to fail. > (The -s can be used in Perl 5 since the XS builds up a separate > "symbol table".) Patch attached. Thanks, applie

[perl #34352] [PATCH] Tru64: strip the strip

2005-03-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi # Please include the string: [perl #34352] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34352 > The ld -s flag caused all symbol information to be stripped from the libraries, wh

Re: [perl #32877] parrot build broken in Tru64, cc/ld confusion

2004-12-06 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
Sam Ruby via RT wrote: > Andrew Dougherty wrote: > >>The offending line in config/gen/makefiles/dynclasses_pl.in >>is probably this one: >> >>$LD $CFLAGS $LDFLAGS $LD_LOAD_FLAGS $LIBPARROT >> >>That CFLAGS doesn't belong there. CFLAGS are intended to be sent to $CC, >>not to $LD. The command

  1   2   >