Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-12 Thread Smylers
Ian Langworth writes: > Ovid: TAP::Parser::Pedantic > > Schwern: TAP::Parser::Heuristic That's the best idea: nobody claiming that his particular parser is _the_ TAP::Parser (or even _the_ TAPx::Parser), but giving them parallel names with adjectives that hint at ways in which they differ. Even

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-10 Thread Nik Clayton
Ovid wrote: - Original Message From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ovid wrote: I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure > > out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. > > Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggeste

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-09 Thread Ian Langworth
Ovid: TAP::Parser::Pedantic Schwern: TAP::Parser::Heuristic I've always feared /^[A-Z]+x::/ namespaces because I never understood them. For the longest time, I thought Jesse was working on "DBI eXtreme" with SearchBuilder and whatnot. On 7/8/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm perfectly co

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-08 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 05:10:50AM -0700, Ovid wrote: > - Original Message > > From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > TAPxParser > > > Thought about that, but immediately discarded it. TAPx::OVID::Parser doesn't > say anything about the parser other than authorship and the latt

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-08 Thread Ovid
- Original Message > From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ovid wrote: > > I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure > > out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. > > Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggested a TAPx::

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-08 Thread Nik Clayton
Ovid wrote: I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure > out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. > Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggested a TAPx:: namespace, > but there could still be competing TAPx::Parser modules. Don't kn

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-08 Thread Ovid
I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggested a TAPx:: namespace, but there could still be competing TAPx::Parser modules. Don't know if that would

TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

2006-07-07 Thread Michael G Schwern
I propose that we all avoid grabbing the juicy names in the top level TAP namespace, such as TAP::Grammar, TAP::Parser and so on. This avoids one module getting the special status of being "the" TAP::Parser. AKA "The CGI.pm problem". Sort of declare a namespace Antarctic Treaty. For example, I