Ovid wrote:
I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure
> out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. > Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggested a TAPx:: namespace, > but there could still be competing TAPx::Parser modules. Don't know if > that would bug folks, though.
TAPx::<CPANID>::Parser ? N
