[perl #128674] [BUG][CONC] Cand't catch Proc::Async-run program exiting with non-zero status

# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #128674] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128674 > zoffix@VirtualBox:~$ cat ~/bin/streams.p6 #!/usr/bin/env perl6 my $p = Proc::Async.new:

[perl #124190] [BUG] Promise::Vow can be constructed from the outside to change the status of a Promise in Rakudo

Fixed in fb991b and spectested in 4f7877. Resolving ticket.

[perl #124190] [BUG] Promise::Vow can be constructed from the outside to change the status of a Promise in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #124190] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=124190 > m: my $promise = Promise.new; say $promise.status; Promise::Vow.new(:$promise).keep(42);

Re: Status of Perl 6 on JVM

On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:09 PM, James E Keenan wrote: > I would like to know the best way to keep apprised of the status of > development of Perl 6 on the JVM. > > I realize that the README cautions, "Rakudo Star fully supports MoarVM and > Parrot; not all modules work on the

Re: Status of Perl 6 on JVM

As of last year: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgPh5Li3k4g https://github.com/donaldh/rakudo http://www.infoq.com/presentations/invokedynamic Would be places to start. On 9/7/14, James E Keenan wrote: > I would like to know the best way to keep apprised of the status of > developm

Status of Perl 6 on JVM

I would like to know the best way to keep apprised of the status of development of Perl 6 on the JVM. I realize that the README cautions, "Rakudo Star fully supports MoarVM and Parrot; not all modules work on the JVM at present." I don't have much familiarity with the JV

ARM status

I managed to complete a build in the past 16 hours on a Raspberry Pi using -fsigned-char (and a lot of swapping) With the fixes in the previous 4 patches the NQP build still crashes, on about the third thing run, with a SIGBUS Fortunately, that turns out to be rather easy to diagnose, particularl

[perl6/specs] f13600: Add "Redeemed" status and .redeem to Promise

: M S17-concurrency.pod Log Message: --- Add "Redeemed" status and .redeem to Promise This would be the equivalent of Channel.close.

Re: 'nom' branch is now default, rakudo release status

Why not just skip August and do your first "nom" release when you would normally have done the 2011.09 one. That would be in about 2-3 weeks anyway. -- Darren Duncan Patrick R. Michaud wrote: We have not as yet created a 2011.08 release based on nom. After much useful discussion and contribut

'nom' branch is now default, rakudo release status

I've just now switched the Rakudo repository on GitHub such that the default branch is now "nom" instead of "master". The nom branch is where nearly all significant Rakudo development has taken place over the last several months -- over 1,800 commits since being forked from the 'master' branch bac

Re: Rakudo Status and Parrot 2.0 (to be)

chromatic wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Parrot 2.0 will come out in less than a week, and I'd like to make sure that > Rakudo #25 will work well with it. What's the current status, and are there > any bugs or errors that need addressing before the release? Rakudo doe

Rakudo Status and Parrot 2.0 (to be)

Hello everyone, Parrot 2.0 will come out in less than a week, and I'd like to make sure that Rakudo #25 will work well with it. What's the current status, and are there any bugs or errors that need addressing before the release? -- c

Re: Language status

Hi, On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:56:46AM -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: > I'm looking forward to Perl 6, and I'm looking into the spec right now, > since that to me is the important bit of a language (I know, I'm > bizarre). I see at http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/ that a lot of the > language spec is s

Re: Language status

> I'm looking forward to Perl 6, and I'm looking into the spec right > now, since that to me is the important bit of a language (I know, > I'm bizarre). Not at all bizarre, P6 language spec development is the most important bit going on in the language right now. Well, that plus all the interestin

Language status

Hey, Perl 6 devs! I'm looking forward to Perl 6, and I'm looking into the spec right now, since that to me is the important bit of a language (I know, I'm bizarre). I see at http://feather.perl6.nl/syn/ that a lot of the language spec is still under development, and some bits still aren't wri

Please Update NEWS, Status, PLATFORMS, etc

Parrot 0.8.1 will come out on Tuesday, 18 November. Please concentrate on bug fixes and closing tickets (low priority fixes are better) until further notice. As well, please update NEWS and various status files, including PLATFORMS (and any deprecations) in preparation for the release. Test

[perl #58628] Re: [ PATCH ] Broken link on parrotcode.org dev page - list item "Parrot Testing Status"

be an appropriate > Parrot Testing Status page. My proposed link target is > http://www.parrot.org/wiki/some-testing-status-tools . If someone wants > to set me up as a site editor I will fix the link myself otherwise the > page is available for someone else to fix the link. Someo

Re: [ PATCH ] Broken link on parrotcode.org dev page - list item "Parrot Testing Status"

Ronald Schmidt wrote: I applied for an account and built what seems to me to be an appropriate Parrot Testing Status page. My proposed link target is http://www.parrot.org/wiki/some-testing-status-tools . If someone wants to set me up as a site editor I will fix the link myself otherwise the

[ PATCH ] Broken link on parrotcode.org dev page - list item "Parrot Testing Status"

I applied for an account and built what seems to me to be an appropriate Parrot Testing Status page. My proposed link target is http://www.parrot.org/wiki/some-testing-status-tools . If someone wants to set me up as a site editor I will fix the link myself otherwise the page is available for

Re: [perl #58610] [ PATCH ] Broken link on parrotcode.org dev page - list item "Parrot Testing Status"

play.html?id=58610 > > > > I applied for an account and built what seems to me to be an appropriate > Parrot Testing Status page. My proposed link target is > http://www.parrot.org/wiki/some-testing-status-tools . If someone wants > to set me up as a site editor I will fix

[perl #58610] [ PATCH ] Broken link on parrotcode.org dev page - list item "Parrot Testing Status"

rot Testing Status page. My proposed link target is http://www.parrot.org/wiki/some-testing-status-tools . If someone wants to set me up as a site editor I will fix the link myself otherwise the page is available for someone else to fix the link. Ron

[perl #57676] [CAGE] Check for shared status of STM handle

ent: /* XXX FIXME: is this enough? what about shared status? */ I dont really know what this function does, what the problem is, or what a solution might be. Somebody who knows STM might take a look? --Andrew Whitworth

Re: Concurrency Branch Languages Status

On Thursday 10 July 2008 10:29:16 Will Coleda wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:25 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just committed a change (r29239) to allow Rakudo to build and run > > the basic tests on the pdd25cx branch. Most of it works. > > New Revision: 29239 > > Modified

Re: Concurrency Branch Languages Status

lasses/Scalar.pir EWRONGBRANCH? > Test Summary Report > --- > t/01-sanity/05-sub (Wstat: 256 Tests: 2 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 2. > t/01-sanity/07-try (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Fa

Concurrency Branch Languages Status

I've just committed a change (r29239) to allow Rakudo to build and run the basic tests on the pdd25cx branch. Most of it works. Test Summary Report --- t/01-sanity/05-sub (Wstat: 256 Tests: 2 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: 1 Parse errors: Bad plan. You pl

Re: Status of Plumhead (licensing considerations)

Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote: Have you thought about license implications? 'genskel.pl' seems to take code snippets from PHP source. Best regards, Bernhard Schmalhofer (I'm replying separately to the two threads in this message.) As far as I can tell, copying the code for a function signat

RT status

x27;tewk' => 1, If you have a ticket in your queue that you haven't reviewed in a while, check it out, make sure it's still relevant. Set the owner to Nobody if you're not going to end up working on it. Add a comment if you've had an idea about how to fix it, but don'

[perl #53826] Patch for updating rakudo's STATUS

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #53826] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53826 > $ svn di -x -u languages/perl6/docs/STATUS Index: languages/perl

YAPC::NA::2008 status updates needed

1. If you have had a Parrot- or Rakudo-oriented presentation accepted at YAPC::NA::2008 in Chicago, please add your name and presentation's name to: http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?yapc_na_2008 2. The Parrot/Rakudo buildfest workshop has been accepted. If you are able to be

Fwd: Documentation Status: Was Re: Build status wiki page

Whoops. This was meant to go to list, not just Andy. -- Forwarded message -- From: Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jan 9, 2008 11:00 PM Subject: Documentation Status: Was Re: Build status wiki page To: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Jan 8, 2008 10

Re: Build status wiki page

On Jan 8, 2008 4:32 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Speaking more broadly, I find parrot's development very scattered. > It's hard to find stuff. Was it on a mailing list? on a web page? > Which web page? launchpad? some blog site? perlfoundation.org? > parrotcode.org? One of

Re: Build status wiki page

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Andy Lester wrote: > > Can you mention what platform tests were failing on? t/shootout isn't > > failing anymore on any platform I have access to. It's very slow, but not > > failing. > > No, I didn't mean that I would maintain it. I just started a place for people > to keep

Re: Build status wiki page

Can you mention what platform tests were failing on? t/shootout isn't failing anymore on any platform I have access to. It's very slow, but not failing. No, I didn't mean that I would maintain it. I just started a place for people to keep notes on, just to get inertia going. Another rea

Re: Build status wiki page

Andy Lester wrote: I've started a wiki page for problems with builds/tests that are known to be problems. http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?build_status This way we have a canonical place to look, rather than wondering "Hmm, did this t/stm/*.t file pass before, or did I break it?

Build status wiki page

I've started a wiki page for problems with builds/tests that are known to be problems. http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?build_status This way we have a canonical place to look, rather than wondering "Hmm, did this t/stm/*.t file pass before, or did I break it?" There's also a

Re: [perl #47391] Current status on Solaris 8/SPARC

fined value ok 13 - inter::progs constructor returned defined value ok 14 - The object isa inter::progs ok 15 - inter::progs has description Compilation failed with 'cc' # Looks like you planned 22 tests but only ran 15. dubious Test returned status 255 (wst

Re: Current status on Solaris 8/SPARC

Andy Dougherty wrote: After fixing various minor little things, here's where I stand on Solaris 8/SPARC after the recent changes. I have not identified any particular common theme. Do these ring any bells? Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed ---

Current status on Solaris 8/SPARC

After fixing various minor little things, here's where I stand on Solaris 8/SPARC after the recent changes. I have not identified any particular common theme. Do these ring any bells? Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed ---

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:37:31PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > >> I meant docs/pdds/draft/pdd10_embedding.pod > >> > >> I could trying hacking on it to at least mention all the functions in > >> embed.h > >> with a few words on each. I'd be fumbling in the dark mostly but i

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Dec 10, 2007 2:44 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Bunce wrote: > > > > p.s. How do I get a commit bit? Or should I just post patches for now? > > Start with patches. > > - Mail/fax in a contribution agreement. > (I thou

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

Andy Armstrong wrote: On 11 Dec 2007, at 22:39, Tim Bunce wrote: Perhaps new contributors could make notes about stumblings blocks encountered along the way, so we know where to put signposts for others who follow. Good plan. I'll keep notes. Great idea. There are a few notes for new contr

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:20:39AM +0200, Allison Randal wrote: > Andy Armstrong wrote: >> >> Where might a volunteer start? >> >> I also promised Yuval that I'd refactor Test::TAP::Model to use >> Test::Harness 3.00 - so to some extent I've answered my own question - but >> I'd like to get my ha

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On 11 Dec 2007, at 22:39, Tim Bunce wrote: Perhaps new contributors could make notes about stumblings blocks encountered along the way, so we know where to put signposts for others who follow. Good plan. I'll keep notes. -- Andy Armstrong, Hexten

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On 11 Dec 2007, at 09:20, Allison Randal wrote: Coding is just a little bit zen. "Programmer who can catch a fly with chopsticks can accomplish anything." Nah, I couldn't possibly code while I was running around trying to hit a fly with a stick :) I guess once I get some headspace I'll ju

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

Andy Armstrong wrote: Where might a volunteer start? I also promised Yuval that I'd refactor Test::TAP::Model to use Test::Harness 3.00 - so to some extent I've answered my own question - but I'd like to get my hands dirty with Parrot proper too. There's a tricky spot at the very beginning

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:57:05AM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 10 December 2007 01:59:40 Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Meanwhile there's some housekeeping I can be getting on with. > > Like fixing the broken Makefile.PL (seems best to make it a wrapper for > > the working Build.PL) > > I've just

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:37:31PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote: > >> > s[...]. It probably makes the > most sense to repeat the group drafting strategy we're using with the PIR > PDD. You and others can help pull together the draft PDD, and I'll > review/revise/approve it as it reaches a relativ

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Tim Bunce wrote: Also, what's the status of docs/embed.pod? It seems out of date and/or imcomplete (no mention of Parrot_call_sub, for example). I'm very much a novice with parrot. So my preferred approach for now would be for someone more knowledgeable (Allison,

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Monday 10 December 2007 15:44:22 Tim Bunce wrote: > $ perl M*PL > Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '501' > Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '80' > Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '79' > Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '81' > Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '501L

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On 10 Dec 2007, at 19:44, Allison Randal wrote: Start with patches. ObHelping: I see a lot of items here: http://www.parrotcode.org/todo.html - but no obvious priorities. Where might a volunteer start? I also promised Yuval that I'd refactor Test::TAP::Model to use Test::Harness 3.00 -

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

Tim Bunce wrote: p.s. How do I get a commit bit? Or should I just post patches for now? Start with patches. - Mail/fax in a contribution agreement. (I thought we had one for you for Perl 5, but apparently not.) - Committers are vote

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Monday 10 December 2007 01:59:40 Tim Bunce wrote: > Meanwhile there's some housekeeping I can be getting on with. > Like fixing the broken Makefile.PL (seems best to make it a wrapper for > the working Build.PL) I've just run it successfully on x86 Ubuntu; what's broken for you and where? --

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

Jeff Horwitz wrote: I can take a stab at this, as I've done enough Parrot embedding to write a short novel. Looks like PDD10 could use some updating as well -- were there any plans for that? Maybe we should start there? Great! Please merge docs/embed.pod into PDD 10. Allison

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

Tim Bunce wrote: I'm interested in doing some work on Parrot::Embed. Great! So I'm wondering what state it's in and if there are any short term plans for it. Any good reason it's not part of the normal build/test cycle? Only that it's incomplete. Also,

Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

I'm interested in doing some work on Parrot::Embed. So I'm wondering what state it's in and if there are any short term plans for it. Any good reason it's not part of the normal build/test cycle? Also, what's the status of docs/embed.pod? It seems out of date and/or

Re: Status of docs/embed.pod and Parrot::Embed?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:59:40AM +, Tim Bunce wrote: > Also, what's the status of docs/embed.pod? It seems out of date and/or > imcomplete (no mention of Parrot_call_sub, for example). I meant docs/pdds/draft/pdd10_embedding.pod I could trying hacking on it to at least ment

Re: TGE Status?

Will Coleda wrote: Anyone have plans for TGE going forward? Will it eventually be phased out in favor of the other pct tools? I handed off maintainership of TGE to Patrick as part of the compiler tool chain, but I'll take it back now. (i.e. you can assign the tickets to me) TGE is a gener

TGE Status?

There are a few tickets in RT for TGE; 44979, 43757, 40002, 39913... However, I noted after talking to Patrick earlier today that TGE isn't currently in use in the new toolchain. Anyone have plans for TGE going forward? Will it eventually be phased out in favor of the other pct tools? --

new object model status

I've spent several days tracking down the final 3 failing tests from the new object model. The tests are in the threads and STM subsystems, which are both partial prototypes and not even fully specified. By the law of diminishing returns, the fact that those subsystems are coming up for a full

Re: Project Idea: Perl 6 Syntax Explainer: Status

A small status update: The name of the project currently is 'perlhints', as suggested by pmurias++ and [particle]++. Some files can be found in the pugs repository in misc/perlhints/ (repository URL: <http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/misc/perlhints/>) There is a command line

Re: PDD15 implementation status

chromatic wrote: On Monday 16 April 2007 17:04, Jonathan Worthington wrote: We're still missing a couple of vtable methods it'd be nice to have in there (does, isa), which I ain't got time for now (need slp), but hopefully somebody may. In as of r18258. Great. Note that they nee

Re: PDD15 implementation status

On Monday 16 April 2007 17:04, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > We're still missing a couple of vtable > methods it'd be nice to have in there (does, isa), which I ain't got > time for now (need slp), but hopefully somebody may. In as of r18258. Note that they need more tests when the subclass(

Re: PDD15 implementation status

Of the things I was hoping would be sorted out before release... Jonathan Worthington wrote: * addattribute segfaults if passed a PDD15 class. I'll fix that tomorrow, if nobody beats me to it Done by chromatic++. :-) * Oh, and the Role PMC doesn't do the name/namespace stuff right yet; it's m

Re: PDD15 implementation status

chromatic wrote: On Sunday 15 April 2007 15:52, Jonathan Worthington wrote: Sorry, I didn't get to adding one yet, but this should do it: $P0 = new 'Class' addattribute $P0 'foo' Hm, it segfaults for me (and rightly so) if I instantiate a non-class (try 'Hash' for some fun), but when

Re: PDD15 implementation status

On Sunday 15 April 2007 15:52, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > chromatic wrote: > Sorry, I didn't get to adding one yet, but this should do it: > > $P0 = new 'Class' > addattribute $P0 'foo' Hm, it segfaults for me (and rightly so) if I instantiate a non-class (try 'Hash' for some fun), but when

Re: PDD15 implementation status

chromatic wrote: On Sunday 15 April 2007 15:28, Jonathan Worthington wrote: * addattribute segfaults if passed a PDD15 class. I'll fix that tomorrow, if nobody beats me to it If there's a test case, I can probably fix it. That'll free you up to implement new things. Sorry, I did

Re: PDD15 implementation status

On Sunday 15 April 2007 15:28, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > * addattribute segfaults if passed a PDD15 class. I'll fix that > tomorrow, if nobody beats me to it If there's a test case, I can probably fix it. That'll free you up to implement new things. -- c

Re: PDD15 implementation status

Jonathan Worthington wrote: #Instantiate it. $P2 = $P2.new() Uh... $P2 = $P1.new() D'oh. Jonathan

PDD15 implementation status

Hi, With much of PDD15 implemented, I thought it'd be good to explain how far along we are (and aren't) as the next release approaches. Here's some code examples. --- # You can initialize a class with a hash... $P0 = new 'Hash' # Set name Will also associate with Monkey namespace nested in c

Re: Packed array status?

2007/2/27, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > 7. Packed arrays with access to raw data pointer to give to API > > Is it possible to point us to some use cases of such packed arrays, > especially the raw data pointer API part? Are you looking for Perl code that creates such packed array

Re: Packed array status?

2007/2/27, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: As a simpler case than a full 3D engine port, I have some OpenGL benchmarks in Perl 5 that I can port -- these have much reduced requirements. Principly, they need: 1. Basic math and string operators (not grammars) 2. Basic looping and simple

Re: Packed array status?

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 16:29 -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 26 February 2007 11:29, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > > > Does Perl 6 on Parrot have Perl 5 connectivity? > > Not until Perl 6 can use PIR code. After that, it depends on what you want > to > do with the two. > > If you can get Par

Re: Packed array status?

On Monday 26 February 2007 11:29, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > Does Perl 6 on Parrot have Perl 5 connectivity? Not until Perl 6 can use PIR code. After that, it depends on what you want to do with the two. If you can get Parrot::Embed compiled and running on your machine, Perl 5 can have Parro

Re: Packed array status?

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 03:02 +0800, Audrey Tang wrote: > 2007/2/27, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Are you looking for Perl code that creates such packed arrays and passes > > them to OpenGL? Or are you looking for links to manpages for the OpenGL > > calls themselves? Or both? > > T

Re: Packed array status?

> Pugs at the moment support all of the above, using the Perl 5 bridge > for "use perl5:SDL" and "use perl5:OpenGL". So the sole requirement > seems to be: Cool beans. I'd had some simple OpenGL code working-with-hacks on Pugs many months ago, but I did not kno

Re: Packed array status?

enting them shouldn't > be too difficult. I just need to have perl6 recognize imported > classnames. (The syntax for making method calls is already in > place and working.) Is there a page where you keep your working / in progress / not working status information? If so, I can look t

Re: Packed array status?

On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 03:48:47PM -0800, chromatic wrote: > On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:40, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > > > What backends support packed native arrays at this point? And what's > > the performance like? > > I don't know if Patrick has using PIR libraries working in Perl 6 > y

Re: Packed array status?

On Sunday 25 February 2007 12:40, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > What backends support packed native arrays at this point? And what's > the performance like? Parrot does have ManagedStruct and UnManagedStruct PMCs for mapping complex C structures. The syntax to define them is a little grotty, but

Packed array status?

What backends support packed native arrays at this point? And what's the performance like? Native access to packed arrays is the big thing I'm looking for before I port a pile of source filtered Perl 5 code to Perl 6. It's a simple 3D engine, so all of the libraries I need to work with want to w

Re: [perl #38482] [PATCH] Update Solaris status in PLATFORMS

On Feb 10, 2006, at 19:42, Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: Good news -- this platform is now mostly working again. Thanks, applied - r11508. leo

[perl #38482] [PATCH] Update Solaris status in PLATFORMS

# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty # Please include the string: [perl #38482] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38482 > Good news -- this platform is now mostly working again. --- parrot-current/PLATFORMS

[perl #37820] [PATCH] Update SPARC status in PLATFORMS

to PLATFORMS reflects the current status. I'd expect the sparc-solaris9 and 10 entries to also be broken, but I can't test them. --- parrot-current/PLATFORMSSun Nov 6 11:15:14 2005 +++ parrot-andy/PLATFORMS Fri Dec 2 13:14:59 2005 @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ openbsd

Re: Cygwin test status

> As you'll see there's a 'Signal 1' message which causes the test to > fail. I'm going to have a look into now. [dynclasses all fail as they > haven't been built] Not being able to find where the 'Signal 1' message was coming from, I've updated cygwin and sure enough the signal test passes now ..

Cygwin test status

9 # ok 10 # ok 11 # ok 12 # ok 13 # ok 14 # ok 15 # ok 16 # ok 17 # ' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 19. dubious Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) DIED. FAILED test 13 Failed 1/19 tests, 94.74% okay Fails due to trig test which has been discussed previously. Have

mod_pugs status

i'm happy to report that mod_parrot now comes bundled with mod_pugs! mod_pugs uses pugs (http://pugscode.org) to let you write apache handlers in perl6, and runs as an HLL layer on top of mod_parrot. pugs' parrot backend compiler is still very immature, so you still can't do many of the things yo

Re: Zero-day rules implementation status in Pugs

On Monday 09 May 2005 19:36, Autrijus Tang wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > > Autrijus wrote: > > >/me eagerly awaits new revelation from Damian... > > > > Be careful what you wish for. Here's draft zero. ;-) > > ..

Zero-day rules implementation status in Pugs

On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote: > Autrijus wrote: > > >/me eagerly awaits new revelation from Damian... > > Be careful what you wish for. Here's draft zero. ;-) ...and here is my status report of the Zero-Day exploit, err, implementation,

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://opensource.fotango.com/software/ponie/plan Wow, great detailed plan. Some remarks: 1) objects seem to be missing Parrot is much more object oriented then Perl5. The Perl5 "magic" that depends on custom vtable is basically the task of creating

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

Nicholas Clark wrote: On 9 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Millsa Erlas wrote: Also, what is the status of Ponie and providing complete interoperability between Perl 5 language and documented XS support and Parrot and Perl 6? I believe that assuring For various internal and external reasons work has been

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

On 6 Apr 2005, at 13:50, Nicholas Clark wrote: The roadmap starts with an introduction to Ponie, gives instructions on how to check it out of CVS and build it, and other useful information, so I'll avoid duplicating its contents here. Ponie is using released versions of Perl 5.9.x, rather than

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

On 9 Mar 2005, at 23:34, Millsa Erlas wrote: Also, what is the status of Ponie and providing complete interoperability between Perl 5 language and documented XS support and Parrot and Perl 6? I believe that assuring For various internal and external reasons work has been pretty much stalled for

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

Markus Laire wrote: I've been following the development of pugs (http://pugscode.org/), so I can give a short answer based on that. While pugs is currently written in Haskell, roadmap does mention the idea to eventually port pugs to perl6 if needed, which would give us a Perl 6 compiler writte

Re: Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

Millsa Erlas wrote: What is the current status of the development of the Parrot and the Perl 6 compiler written in Perl? I hope that producing a Perl 6 compiler written in Perl 6 and the Parrot VM is still a high priority and is being actively developed as the premier compiler and VM for the

Regarding status of Parrot and pure perl Perl6 compiler

What is the current status of the development of the Parrot and the Perl 6 compiler written in Perl? I hope that producing a Perl 6 compiler written in Perl 6 and the Parrot VM is still a high priority and is being actively developed as the premier compiler and VM for the Perl 6 language. A

Re: Status of Perl 6 Compiler?

consumption. We should expect to see the community involved after the grammar engine is in a good state. > Is there some other source that I can regularly check to get status > updates and/or rough timelines? Here. It's been low traffic lately, because there's not much to talk ab

Re: Status of Perl 6 Compiler?

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:03:04AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It was my understanding that Patrick Michaud was working on the Perl 6 > grammar and after that was done, the work on the actual compiler would > commence. I've checked http://dev.perl.org/perl6/ and I don't see any > more inform

Status of Perl 6 Compiler?

regularly check to get status updates and/or rough timelines? I don't see much here to give me any indication of where we are (or I'm incredibly dense. Don't discount that possibility.) Cheers, Ovid = Silence is Evilhttp://users.easystreet.com/ovid/phi

Re: Python/Pirate status

Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I meant the ability to do things like '$P0 = new "Py_int"'. > Could this be JITed? The mapping between string class name and assigned > PMC type is constant throughout the life of the VM... Not really or not easily. Fastest is to have type enum numbers

Re: Python/Pirate status

Leopold Toetsch wrote: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm now converting to dynclasses. To be honest, I'm not thrilled with this. What I would really prefer is a Parrot_new_p_s opcode with the runtime worrying about caching class names across sub and module boundaries. $P0 = new "Py_int" o

Re: Python/Pirate status

Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm now converting to dynclasses. To be honest, I'm not thrilled with > this. What I would really prefer is a Parrot_new_p_s opcode with the > runtime worrying about caching class names across sub and module boundaries. $P0 = new "Py_int" or some such ha

  1   2   3   4   >