On Jun 1, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Steve Peters wrote:
I can't see any need for such a macro other than for the minor
obfuscation
that it allows. For most of the Parrot code, I haven't SET_NULL()
used, and
I haven't used it myself. I'm a bit curious how much it is
actuall
On Jun 1, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Steve Peters wrote:
I can't see any need for such a macro other than for the minor
obfuscation
that it allows. For most of the Parrot code, I haven't SET_NULL()
used, and
I haven't used it myself. I'm a bit curious how much it is
ac
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:53:35PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> From include/parrot/parrot.h:
>
> /* weird architectures might need this, s. C-FAQ 5.17
> *
> * the SET_NULL macros are only for system, where a NULL pointer
> * isn't represented by zeroes, so don't use
From include/parrot/parrot.h:
/* weird architectures might need this, s. C-FAQ 5.17
*
* the SET_NULL macros are only for system, where a NULL pointer
* isn't represented by zeroes, so don't use these, for resetting
* non-null pointers
*/
#ifdef HAS_NON_ZERO_NULL
# define SET_NULL(x
