On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:39:26PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> I'll overlay queens.pasm with a newly generated one.
Works beautifully, thanks.
--
Some people claim that the UNIX learning curve is steep, but at least you
only have to climb it once.
Simon --
> > I'd still like to check in an updated queens.pasm, although, I'd be
> > happy to wait while this problem is fixed since there aren't other
> > tests of the rotate op.
>
> I think Jako is confused about what 'rotate' rotates - we now have a
> control stack and a generic stack. 'save'
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 02:08:45PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> I'd still like to check in an updated queens.pasm, although, I'd be
> happy to wait while this problem is fixed since there aren't other
> tests of the rotate op.
I think Jako is confused about what 'rotate' rotates - we now have
Alex --
> > The newly generated queens.pasm doesn't do rotate(). So, that's why
> > it succeeds, I guess. I notice that
> >
> > grep 'clone|restore|save|rotate' *.t
> >
> > doesn't find any matches in t/op. That makes it real easy for things
> > to drift.
>
> There are certainly save and resto
On 6 Dec 2001, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> Dan --
> The newly generated queens.pasm doesn't do rotate(). So, that's why
> it succeeds, I guess. I notice that
>
> grep 'clone|restore|save|rotate' *.t
>
> doesn't find any matches in t/op. That makes it real easy for things
> to drift.
There are cer
Dan --
> > > Either way is fine with me. Let me know and I'll check in an updated
> > > version...
> >
> >Well, uh, neither, actually. :) I think the implementation of "rotate"
> >is broken, since the parameters to rotate_entries are all stuffed up.
> >I'm amazed this compiles:
> >
> >core_ops.c:
At 07:07 PM 12/6/2001 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:47:54PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> > Either way is fine with me. Let me know and I'll check in an updated
> > version...
>
>Well, uh, neither, actually. :) I think the implementation of "rotate"
>is broken, since the
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:47:54PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> Either way is fine with me. Let me know and I'll check in an updated
> version...
Well, uh, neither, actually. :) I think the implementation of "rotate"
is broken, since the parameters to rotate_entries are all stuffed up.
I'm ama
At 01:47 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 13:32, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Well, it builds. The makefile needs serious abuse, the test harness just
> > flat doesn't work, and there are warnings about sloppy code all over, but
> > it builds and runs.
> >
> > Whups, ta
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 13:32, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Well, it builds. The makefile needs serious abuse, the test harness just
> flat doesn't work, and there are warnings about sloppy code all over, but
> it builds and runs.
>
> Whups, take that back. queens.pbc ACCVIOs and dies. Damn.
Interestin
10 matches
Mail list logo
