On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:50:00AM -0400, Ken Fox wrote:
> Please say the file extensions are only needed to prevent a clash of the
> source file and bytecode if they're stored in the same directory...
>
> We can say "parrot foo.whatever" and parrot will do the right thing
> regardless if foo.wha
Dan wrote:
> I like it. It's a race between those and Randal's .par and .rot (for the
> bytecode) extensions.
Please say the file extensions are only needed to prevent a clash of the
source file and bytecode if they're stored in the same directory...
We can say "parrot foo.whatever" and parrot w
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 07:10 am, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Simon" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Simon> Actually, I'm trying to make the bytecode magic be 0x13155A1.
>
> Can you swing a cluestick in my direction? Whuh?
In decimal, 20010401, or 1 April 2001, the "bi
> "Simon" == Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> Actually, I'm trying to make the bytecode magic be 0x13155A1.
Can you swing a cluestick in my direction? Whuh?
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.stonehe
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:25:45PM +, Stephane Payrard wrote:
> > precompiled code could have the extension .dead as in
> > the parrot code is dead, it is dead parrot code, it
> > is not running
>
> In that case, "DEADC0DE" would be an appropriate heaxadecimal magic
> header just like "
Hi Leon!
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > I like it
>
> The following amusing entries were posted on london.pm-list but
> I haven't seen them here, so without further ado:
>
> Greg McCarroll:
> pbc could be shortened to
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
> I like it
The following amusing entries were posted on london.pm-list but
I haven't seen them here, so without further ado:
Greg McCarroll:
pbc could be shortened to pb, which has two meanings
precompiled byte code and pretty boy, as
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Simon Cozens writes:
> > I was using .pas and .pac. Gotta think about 8.3ness, unfortunately.
>
> .pas is generally Pascal.
>
> I also think it's important we choose extensions based around their
> humour potential. With that in mind, I propose:
>On Win32, file extensions get cut off after 3 characters. So a ".html"
>file is actually the same as a ".htm" file, I think.
This isn't true
George Bouris
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:58:50 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>I was using .pas and .pac. Gotta think about 8.3ness, unfortunately.
The "8" might not be that relevant nowadays, but the "3" still matters.
On Win32, file extensions get cut off after 3 characters. So a ".html"
file is actually the same a
Simon Cozens writes:
> I was using .pas and .pac. Gotta think about 8.3ness, unfortunately.
.pas is generally Pascal.
I also think it's important we choose extensions based around their
humour potential. With that in mind, I propose:
.par for Parrot source, and .pao for Parrot Objects would
# -Original Message-
# From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
# Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 10:59 AM
# To: Dan Sugalski
# Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Subject: Re: Something to hash out
#
#
# On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:37:35AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
# > I'm currently thi
On 8/25/01 10:37 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'm currently thinking of using .pasm as the extension for parrot assembly
> code, and .pbc for precompiled bytecode. [...] Can anyone think of anything
> better? They seem rather lame.
I think they're just fine, actually. I like them better than anythi
> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> I've got the rudiments of the parrot interpreter and assembler built
Dan> and running. (I get around 23M ops/sec on a 700MHz Alpha EV6) I'm
Dan> beating it up enough to get it into a reasonably released state, so
Dan> while I'm doing th
At 06:58 PM 8/25/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:37:35AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I'm currently thinking of using .pasm as the extension for parrot assembly
> > code, and .pbc for precompiled bytecode. (Yes, the interpreter loads and
> > runs compiled bytecode fro
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:37:35AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I'm currently thinking of using .pasm as the extension for parrot assembly
> code, and .pbc for precompiled bytecode. (Yes, the interpreter loads and
> runs compiled bytecode from disk. Wheee!) Can anyone think of anything
> better
16 matches
Mail list logo
