Simon Cozens writes:
> I was using .pas and .pac. Gotta think about 8.3ness, unfortunately.

.pas is generally Pascal.

I also think it's important we choose extensions based around their
humour potential.  With that in mind, I propose:

  .par for Parrot source, and .pao for Parrot Objects would be cool.
  Sample files:

    under.par
    kung.pao

Actually, are these the only two types of file we're going to
generate?  Won't there be unoptimized bytecode, parse trees, etc?  Do
we want an integrated set of extensions (.pa?)?

Nat

Reply via email to