Simon Cozens writes: > I was using .pas and .pac. Gotta think about 8.3ness, unfortunately. .pas is generally Pascal. I also think it's important we choose extensions based around their humour potential. With that in mind, I propose: .par for Parrot source, and .pao for Parrot Objects would be cool. Sample files: under.par kung.pao Actually, are these the only two types of file we're going to generate? Won't there be unoptimized bytecode, parse trees, etc? Do we want an integrated set of extensions (.pa?)? Nat
- Something to hash out Dan Sugalski
- Re: Something to hash out Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Something to hash out John Siracusa
- Re: Something to hash out Simon Cozens
- Re: Something to hash out Dan Sugalski
- RE: Something to hash out Brent Dax
- Re: Something to hash out Nathan Torkington
- Re: Something to hash out Bart Lateur
- Re: Something to hash out gbouris
- Re: Something to hash out Dan Sugalski
- Re: Something to hash out Leon Brocard
- Re: Something to hash out Stephane Payrard
- Re: Something to hash out Simon Cozens
- Re: Something to hash out Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Something to hash out Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Something to hash out Ken Fox
- Re: Something to hash out Simon Cozens