On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:27 PM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At ny.pm tonight, I was discussing the joys and sorrows of Parrot cage
> cleaning with one attendee. I just discovered that while you can search the
> newsgroup for the string 'cage' in a posting's subject line, there is
On Monday 18 February 2008 07:38:57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Two straight comment patches seeking commitment: currently attached.
>
> (to exception.c and headers.c)
Thanks, applied with some tweaks as r25858.
-- c
Two straight comment patches seeking commitment: currently attached.
(to exception.c and headers.c)
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.comIndex: src/exceptions.c
==
Patches to events.c and inter_misc.c should be attached to the back
bumper. If they're OK, perhaps someone could commit them?
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.comIndex: src/events.c
Attached patch to pmc.c
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.comIndex: src/pmc.c
===
--- src/pmc.c (revision 25371)
+++ src/pmc.c (working copy)
@@ -472,7 +472,9 @@
Attached are patches to embed.c and runops_cores.c
The embed.c patch also includes an attempt to clarify another comment.
(It's not obvious that the code is doing all that the comment claims, but
I didn't investigate that.)
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to go
Paul Cochrane writes:
> as you can see in the snippets above from the weekly rt summary
> message, we have 500+ tickets. many of these are unclassified with
> regard to platform, severity, language, etc. classification of these
> tickets, and creation of shared queries we can use to manage the
Mark,
Random cage cleaner here. At Andy Lester's suggestion, I've begun
working on this splint stuff. So everything below is all his fault. :)
Great to have another cage cleaner around :-) There aren't many of us
at this stage!
In my (very limited) dealings with splint I too have found pro
It's not magic, there is an option in RT for the old owner to give it
away (which solves a subset of cases) but for me at least it was counter
intuitive.
The hideously old version of RT on rt.cpan.org is being replace shortly,
and I imagine that Jesse will have way of taking maint changes into
Andy Lester wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:10:24PM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I
can't take ownership of the RT requests.
RT should do it automagically. Email Jesse directly if not.
As I found out when taki
Andy Lester wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:10:24PM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I
>> can't take ownership of the RT requests.
>
> RT should do it automagically. Email Jesse directly if not.
>
> xoxo,
> Andy
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:19:42PM -0500, Christopher H. Laco ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For which, first-come, or do all of the co-maints have full RT access as
> well?
I don't know.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
Andy Lester wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:10:24PM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I
>> can't take ownership of the RT requests.
>
> RT should do it automagically. Email Jesse directly if not.
>
> xoxo,
> Andy
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:10:24PM -0800, Ovid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I
> can't take ownership of the RT requests.
RT should do it automagically. Email Jesse directly if not.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've wondered about this myself. I've taken over Class::Trait but I
can't take ownership of the RT requests.
Cheers,
Ovid
--- "Christopher H. Laco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When one person takes over the module of another on CPAN via co-maint
> a
> first-come tranfer, what happens to the RT
William Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This week's Hall of Shame ticket is [perl #15308]
It's outdated and obsolete. We have nested keys since quite a time.
And vtables do inherit default methods.
leo
Sam Ruby wrote:
Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next),
Hash(fromkeys), Iterator(next), and PerlHash(fromkeys) now?
The fromkeys in Hash and PerlHash can be removed. The .next methods in
iterable PMCs will be needed generally. But iterators need some rework
still, e
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
- The NCI method has an implementation in Hash and in PerlHash, this is
not nice
The NCI method is automatically inherited from Hash. But as it's a
python method it'll be removed from Hash anyway.
Any objections to the NCI methods being removed from Coroutine(next),
Hash(fro
Bernhard Schmalhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The PerlHash is now an extension of Hash.
Great, thanks.
> The semantics should not have changed. For example, integer values are
> still stored as PerlInt PMCs in the Hash PMC.
I'd propose the following:
* instead of PerlInt an Integer PM
> I'd like to see:
...
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Will Coleda wrote:
Robert has provided me access to the RT command line tool, which I scripted
around to generate this small report. I'd appreciate feedback on whether
or not something like this would be useful (and suggestions for other things
to report on are welcome.)
If we can settle on a desir
Even if there is no special syntax, it'd be helpful if the person applying the patch fired off a
"Thanks, Applied" or some such. Saves the bugadmins the trouble of checking the source
to see if it's actually been applied or not.
Will "slogging through RT" Coleda.
William Coleda wrote:
http://rt.p
> clarification on some others - outgoing emails were being eaten by a
> grue for a while, but Robert says it's fixed now - I'll be sending out
To clarify. Only explicit CC's to the list were broken. All other
outbound mail was fine.
-R
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
> >On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> > > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> > > ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> > > variables
At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need
> ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all
> variables with names like $T01JHGJ_001
That can make it kind of nas
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote:
> At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> >Melvin:
> >
> >Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
> >int main () {
> >> int if = 1;
> >>
> >> if (if) {
> >> if = 0;
> >> }
> >>}
>
> My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we
At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
Melvin:
Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
int main () {
int if = 1;
if (if) {
if = 0;
}
}
do you have a patch? I think its a nice to have so If you sourself
provide a nice patch guess it would be applied :)
I thought I replied to this
Melvin:
Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you:
http://bugs6.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24251
I don't have a suggested patch, sorry.
Regards.
On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 04:42 PM, Stephane Peiry wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:42, Will Coleda wrote:
24251 - warnocked
I don't like
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> Try
> cd languages/perl6
> ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1 # don't worry if it fails
> make test
$ ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1
error:imcc:fixup_bsrs: couldn't find addr of sub '_main'
Error: '/home/doughera/src/parrot/parrot-andy/parrot -r __eval_
Andrew Dougherty wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error 1 years
Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recentl
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote:
> On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> >1 years
> >
> > Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
>
> How recently did you check? I
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error
> 1 years
>
> Keep this one open. The tests still fail.
How recently did you check? I committed a reimplementation of perl6
regexes abou
On Sat, 1 Feb 2004, Stephane Peiry wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
> requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
> address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
> as obsolete (unless they are
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 23039 [PATCH] event handling-2
A similar patch is in, either applied or obsolete and resolved.
> 16300 [BUG] hash clone hangs
> 17158 [PACTH] reduce size of core_ops_prederef.* by a fair amount
> 17244 [PACTH] hash ops at runtime for op_code() looku
--- Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
> requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
> address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
> as obsolete (unless they are obvio
Hi All,
Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the
requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email
address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these
as obsolete (unless they are obviously resolved, "patch applied" or
else ;)
Thanks
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> So changing own requests seems to be ok.
That's what I just observed too. I can change my own tickets, but I
can't do anything to any others.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got two things to look at now.
Taking/Closing tickets requires me to grant you special access (which
I will do if you ask.)
I'm going away for the weekend, so I'll take a look at these two
issues on monday or tuesday.
-R
will coleda writes:
>Which reminds me:
>
>I have an account, but
Which reminds me:
I have an account, but no privs to speak of: I can't view -any- tickets.
Melvin Smith wrote:
>
> Privs still need updating. Some of us still can't take/close tickets.
>
> -Melvin Smith
>
> IBM :: Atlanta Innovation Center
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 770-835-6984
At 3:38 PM -0500 3/28/02, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>Should we be using bugs6 for all patches?
Certainly not required--I want the patches more than I want people to
jump through any extra hoops. I won't object if people do, though. :)
>At 15:04 on 03/28/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Should we be using bugs6 for all patches?
--Josh
At 15:04 on 03/28/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you come across bugs, or there are things that should be
> implemented but aren't, could folks make entries in the perl 6
> bugtracking system so we don't lose track? ht
41 matches
Mail list logo
