At 3:38 PM -0500 3/28/02, Josh Wilmes wrote: >Should we be using bugs6 for all patches?
Certainly not required--I want the patches more than I want people to jump through any extra hoops. I won't object if people do, though. :) >At 15:04 on 03/28/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When you come across bugs, or there are things that should be >> implemented but aren't, could folks make entries in the perl 6 >> bugtracking system so we don't lose track? http://bugs6.perl.org. >> Thanks. >> >> (And don't feel like any code I've written is sacrosanct--it's not, >> and I'm happy to have it yanked out and replaced with stuff that > > works better) -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
