Re: Parrot and Smolder

2008-06-17 Thread James E Keenan
I forwarded this to parrotbug so that an RT is opened.

Re: Parrot and Smolder

2008-06-17 Thread jerry gay
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got this working pretty well on my checkout (except that the current > revision, #28476, doesn't build). You can do a "make smolder_test" and have > the > results sent to the Smolder server. I talked with chromatic

Re: Parrot and Smolder

2008-06-17 Thread Michael Peters
I've got this working pretty well on my checkout (except that the current revision, #28476, doesn't build). You can do a "make smolder_test" and have the results sent to the Smolder server. I talked with chromatic and some others about removing some of the old existing smoke stuff, but I'll do that

Re: Parrot and Smolder

2008-06-15 Thread Michael Peters
Will Coleda wrote: > In general, we're trying to avoid including more non-core modules with > parrot. However I personally wouldn't have a problem with this bundle > until we resolve the issues with Bundle::Parrot. (issues == we don't > actually require it. =-) That sounds good. T::H3 was built t

Re: Parrot and Smolder

2008-06-15 Thread Will Coleda
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had mentioned this to some people at the Oslo QA Hackthon, but I've been > really busy since then. Now that I'm at YAPC, I should have some good hacking > time, so here goes... > > My place of business (Plus Three, LP) h